Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Depot Maintenance Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense industries
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Depot Maintenance Management Task Force was convened as a follow- on to earlier Department of Defense reviews of depot maintenance undertaken in conjunction with recent force structure changes. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the current study outlined nine specific Congressionally-mandated tasks and required the Task Force to submit appropriate recommendations for legislative and administrative actions. Each of the nine tasks is addressed in this report or the attached appendices. To gain the benefits of advice from both the government and industry, a large Task Force of very senior representatives of both sectors was assembled. Membership included defense industry corporate executives and senior operating officers as well as senior DoD logistics commanders and executives. In comprising the Task Force in this manner, the Defense Science Board benefited from a wide range of backgrounds and depth of experience. Four Task Force panels were formed to address unique depot maintenance commodity considerations. Depot maintenance is accomplished using a balance of public sector (organic) maintenance depots and private sector (commercial) firms. There are significant differences in how organic depots and private sector firms are structured. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) usually have large staffs for engineering, research and development, marketing and other functions. Organic depots are also heavily facilitized and are often large-scale, integrated industrial activities with the capability and capacity for multiple commodities. On the other end of the spectrum are private sector services companies that are specifically organized to have minimum overhead. Organic depots exist to support the readiness and sustainability requirements of United States combat forces.
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Depot Maintenance Management
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Depot Maintenance Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense industries
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Depot Maintenance Management Task Force was convened as a follow- on to earlier Department of Defense reviews of depot maintenance undertaken in conjunction with recent force structure changes. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the current study outlined nine specific Congressionally-mandated tasks and required the Task Force to submit appropriate recommendations for legislative and administrative actions. Each of the nine tasks is addressed in this report or the attached appendices. To gain the benefits of advice from both the government and industry, a large Task Force of very senior representatives of both sectors was assembled. Membership included defense industry corporate executives and senior operating officers as well as senior DoD logistics commanders and executives. In comprising the Task Force in this manner, the Defense Science Board benefited from a wide range of backgrounds and depth of experience. Four Task Force panels were formed to address unique depot maintenance commodity considerations. Depot maintenance is accomplished using a balance of public sector (organic) maintenance depots and private sector (commercial) firms. There are significant differences in how organic depots and private sector firms are structured. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) usually have large staffs for engineering, research and development, marketing and other functions. Organic depots are also heavily facilitized and are often large-scale, integrated industrial activities with the capability and capacity for multiple commodities. On the other end of the spectrum are private sector services companies that are specifically organized to have minimum overhead. Organic depots exist to support the readiness and sustainability requirements of United States combat forces.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense industries
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Depot Maintenance Management Task Force was convened as a follow- on to earlier Department of Defense reviews of depot maintenance undertaken in conjunction with recent force structure changes. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the current study outlined nine specific Congressionally-mandated tasks and required the Task Force to submit appropriate recommendations for legislative and administrative actions. Each of the nine tasks is addressed in this report or the attached appendices. To gain the benefits of advice from both the government and industry, a large Task Force of very senior representatives of both sectors was assembled. Membership included defense industry corporate executives and senior operating officers as well as senior DoD logistics commanders and executives. In comprising the Task Force in this manner, the Defense Science Board benefited from a wide range of backgrounds and depth of experience. Four Task Force panels were formed to address unique depot maintenance commodity considerations. Depot maintenance is accomplished using a balance of public sector (organic) maintenance depots and private sector (commercial) firms. There are significant differences in how organic depots and private sector firms are structured. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) usually have large staffs for engineering, research and development, marketing and other functions. Organic depots are also heavily facilitized and are often large-scale, integrated industrial activities with the capability and capacity for multiple commodities. On the other end of the spectrum are private sector services companies that are specifically organized to have minimum overhead. Organic depots exist to support the readiness and sustainability requirements of United States combat forces.
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Depot Maintenance Management
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 259
Book Description
The Depot Maintenance Management Task Force was convened as a follow- on to earlier Department of Defense reviews of depot maintenance undertaken in conjunction with recent force structure changes. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the current study outlined nine specific Congressionally-mandated tasks and required the Task Force to submit appropriate recommendations for legislative and administrative actions. Each of the nine tasks is addressed in this report or the attached appendices. To gain the benefits of advice from both the government and industry, a large Task Force of very senior representatives of both sectors was assembled. Membership included defense industry corporate executives and senior operating officers as well as senior DoD logistics commanders and executives. In comprising the Task Force in this manner, the Defense Science Board benefited from a wide range of backgrounds and depth of experience. Four Task Force panels were formed to address unique depot maintenance commodity considerations. Depot maintenance is accomplished using a balance of public sector (organic) maintenance depots and private sector (commercial) firms. There are significant differences in how organic depots and private sector firms are structured. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) usually have large staffs for engineering, research and development, marketing and other functions. Organic depots are also heavily facilitized and are often large-scale, integrated industrial activities with the capability and capacity for multiple commodities. On the other end of the spectrum are private sector services companies that are specifically organized to have minimum overhead. Organic depots exist to support the readiness and sustainability requirements of United States combat forces.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 259
Book Description
The Depot Maintenance Management Task Force was convened as a follow- on to earlier Department of Defense reviews of depot maintenance undertaken in conjunction with recent force structure changes. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the current study outlined nine specific Congressionally-mandated tasks and required the Task Force to submit appropriate recommendations for legislative and administrative actions. Each of the nine tasks is addressed in this report or the attached appendices. To gain the benefits of advice from both the government and industry, a large Task Force of very senior representatives of both sectors was assembled. Membership included defense industry corporate executives and senior operating officers as well as senior DoD logistics commanders and executives. In comprising the Task Force in this manner, the Defense Science Board benefited from a wide range of backgrounds and depth of experience. Four Task Force panels were formed to address unique depot maintenance commodity considerations. Depot maintenance is accomplished using a balance of public sector (organic) maintenance depots and private sector (commercial) firms. There are significant differences in how organic depots and private sector firms are structured. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) usually have large staffs for engineering, research and development, marketing and other functions. Organic depots are also heavily facilitized and are often large-scale, integrated industrial activities with the capability and capacity for multiple commodities. On the other end of the spectrum are private sector services companies that are specifically organized to have minimum overhead. Organic depots exist to support the readiness and sustainability requirements of United States combat forces.
قبل الشتات
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Addendum to the Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Depot Maintenance Management
Author: United States. Defense Science Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Outsourcing and Privatization
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981594
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Book Description
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981594
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Tactical Air Warfare
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981845
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 90
Book Description
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981845
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 90
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Readiness
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428982965
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428982965
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Institutionalizing Stability Operations Within DoD.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Stability
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Stability
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Logistics Modernization
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Integrated logistic support
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Integrated logistic support
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Report of the Defense Science Board Acquisition Workforce Sub-Panel of the Defense Acquisition Reform Task Force on defense reform
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981268
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 168
Book Description
This report provides three policy recommendations, based on the overarching theme of more closely integrating DoD with industry. The Sub-Panel believes that improved integration with industry is the critical element that will enable the acquisition system to perform better, faster, and cheaper in support of the warfighter. The recommended policy initiatives are that DoD should: 1. Restructure its Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT & E) organizations and associated workforce to enable the Department to make better use of the capabilities of industry and other government agencies, to concentrate in-house capabilities in areas where there is no external capability, and to eliminate duplicative capabilities. 2 Expand the use of price-based forms of contracting to reduce the cost of doing business with Department of Defense (DoD) for existing Defense contractors and to give DoD access the segments of industry that currently choose not to do business with the Department because of the costs and complexities associated with cost-based contracts. 3. Expand the oursourcing of sustainment activities to eliminate duplicative capabilities between DoD and industry, to enable the Department to capitalize on industry's advancements in applying technology to these functions, and to provide better support to the user.
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428981268
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 168
Book Description
This report provides three policy recommendations, based on the overarching theme of more closely integrating DoD with industry. The Sub-Panel believes that improved integration with industry is the critical element that will enable the acquisition system to perform better, faster, and cheaper in support of the warfighter. The recommended policy initiatives are that DoD should: 1. Restructure its Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT & E) organizations and associated workforce to enable the Department to make better use of the capabilities of industry and other government agencies, to concentrate in-house capabilities in areas where there is no external capability, and to eliminate duplicative capabilities. 2 Expand the use of price-based forms of contracting to reduce the cost of doing business with Department of Defense (DoD) for existing Defense contractors and to give DoD access the segments of industry that currently choose not to do business with the Department because of the costs and complexities associated with cost-based contracts. 3. Expand the oursourcing of sustainment activities to eliminate duplicative capabilities between DoD and industry, to enable the Department to capitalize on industry's advancements in applying technology to these functions, and to provide better support to the user.