Trial Dynamics in Civil & Criminal Litigation

Trial Dynamics in Civil & Criminal Litigation PDF Author: Cathy E. Bennett
Publisher: West Group
ISBN: 9780314022707
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 220

Get Book Here

Book Description

Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics in Civil and Criminal Litigation

Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics in Civil and Criminal Litigation PDF Author: Cathy E. Bennett
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780314011688
Category : Jury selection
Languages : en
Pages : 420

Get Book Here

Book Description


Trial Dynamics in Civil & Criminal Litigation

Trial Dynamics in Civil & Criminal Litigation PDF Author: Cathy E. Bennett
Publisher: West Group
ISBN: 9780314022707
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 220

Get Book Here

Book Description


Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics in Civil and Criminal Litigation, 1995 Pocket Part and 1995 Appendices Volume

Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics in Civil and Criminal Litigation, 1995 Pocket Part and 1995 Appendices Volume PDF Author: Robert B. Hirschhorn
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780314069337
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64

Get Book Here

Book Description


Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics

Bennett's Guide to Jury Selection and Trial Dynamics PDF Author: Cathy E. Bennett
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1026

Get Book Here

Book Description


TRIAL TECHNIQUES AND TRIALS

TRIAL TECHNIQUES AND TRIALS PDF Author: THOMAS A. MAUET
Publisher: Aspen Publishing
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 688

Get Book Here

Book Description


Dynamics of Trial Practice

Dynamics of Trial Practice PDF Author: Ronald L. Carlson
Publisher: West Academic Publishing
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 752

Get Book Here

Book Description
Contains Strategic Litigation Planning and Jury Selection; Opening StatementExercise in Res Ipsa Loquitur; Objections Which Make Strategic or Tactical Sense; Putting the Witness' Honesty and Intelligence on Display; Making Factual Assertions Under the Guise of Asking Questions; Using the Theory and Theme to Bracket Your Case and Using the Opposing Witnesses to Support Your Theory and Theme; Direct Examination of Expert WitnessesPresenting Your Opinion Testimony Impressively But Clearly; Cross-Examination of Expert WitnessesDemystifying Opposing Experts; Instructions ConferenceObtaining Judicial Imprimatur on Your Theory and Theme; Closing ArgumentUsing the Theory and Theme to Answer the "Why" Questions; Trial Motions.

The Dynamics of Law

The Dynamics of Law PDF Author: Michael S Hamilton
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1317457439
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 232

Get Book Here

Book Description
Thoroughly revised and updated, this widely used text offers a concise introduction to the American legal system for students without a legal background. The book's coverage is cross-disciplinary, informed by the literature of law, business administration and the social sciences, especially public administration and policy. Its goal is to give non-lawyers in all these areas a lucid overview of the workings of the American legal system as it may affect individuals and organizations in their interactions with each other and the environment.Unlike longer, more expensive competing works, "The Dynamics of Law" presents its subject with clarity and precision, and minimal use of legal terms. It offers clear explanations of how to brief a case and how statutes and regulations are codified in the United States. Study problems and review questions in each chapter, drawn from legal literature as well as general interest articles and books, are designed to stimulate classroom discussion.

Responsibilities and Dispensations

Responsibilities and Dispensations PDF Author: Carl N. Edwards
Publisher: Carl N Edwards
ISBN: 0970512880
Category : Criminal liability
Languages : en
Pages : 478

Get Book Here

Book Description


Destruction of Evidence

Destruction of Evidence PDF Author: Jamie S. Gorelick
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer
ISBN: 0735545499
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 544

Get Book Here

Book Description
A practice manual as well as an authoritative resource, Destruction of Evidence analyzes issues from the standpoints of civil litigation, criminal litigation, and the laws of professional responsibility. Destruction of Evidence also discusses in-depth such areas as: the spoliation inference the tort of spoliation discovery sanctions ethics, and routine destruction Also included is an expanded discussion of discovery sanctions, including procedural issues, choice-of-law considerations, the requirements for preserving sanctions issues for appellate review, burdens of proof, and appellate review. The supplement keeps you up to date on the continuing development of the controversial torts of both first- and third party spoliation of evidence: Massachusetts has declined to recognize a cause of action in tort for intentional or negligent spoliation of evidence The Supreme Court of Mississippi did not recognize an independent cause of action for the intentional spoliation of evidence against first or third party spoliators Nevada declined to recognize an independent tort spoliation of evidence when weighed against the andquot;potentially endless litigation over a speculative loss, and by the cost to society of promoting onerous record and evidence retention policiesandquot; Constitutional implications in the realm of criminal law. Many states within the last year have been addressing the potential for due process violations when evidence is destroyed and are continuing to adopt and expand the rules dictated by Brady, Trombetta, and Youngblood. While each of these new jurisdictions refused to find due process violation, this trend recognizes the increased potential for constitutional violations when evidence is destroyed: Hawaii refused to find a constitutional violation where a police officer failed to save her completed police report, citing Brady The Supreme Court of Mississippi ruled that a defendant was not denied due process by spoliation of crime scene evidence, citing Trombetta Nevada, using a bad faith standard, ruled that an independent laboratory's failure to refrigerate a defendant's blood sample did not violate due process A New Jersey court did not find a due process violation where the police had lost a videotape of the administration of breath tests for a DUI charge Oklahoma ruled that a defendant's due process rights were not violated when the police destroyed latent crime scene fingerprints, citing Youngblood Using an exculpatory evidence standard, the Supreme Court of South Dakota ruled that the State's release of a rape victim's vehicle without notice to the defendant did not violate the defendant's due process rights.

Dynamic Interpretation in International Criminal Law

Dynamic Interpretation in International Criminal Law PDF Author: Alexander Grabert
Publisher: Herbert Utz Verlag
ISBN: 3831644705
Category : International crimes
Languages : en
Pages : 244

Get Book Here

Book Description
The interpretive process in International Criminal Law (›ICL‹) is characterised by a conflict between the requirements for stability and change. On the one hand, ICL provides for the ›criminal‹ responsibility of individuals. Thus, there is an enhanced requirement for legal certainty: According to the principle of legality, the addressee of the law must be able to identify the prohibited conduct in advance in order to be able to avoid criminal sanctions. On the other hand, however, ICL forms part of ›international‹ law. Hence, it derives to some extent from international treaties. Whereas the forms of criminal conduct are continuously evolving, treaties are rather static instruments – they cannot be adapted to a changing environment within a short period of time. Thus, reality is developing at a pace that the law cannot always match. In consequence, there is a certain need to account for evolving circumstances within the framework of interpretation. The aim of this book is to review the consequences of this conflict for the interpretation of ICL. How can the conflicting requirements be brought into balance? Can substantive rules of ICL be interpreted in a ›dynamic‹ fashion to the detriment of the accused without violating the principle of legality? How do international criminal courts and tribunals deal with this issue?