Report of the NIH Peer Review Committee PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Report of the NIH Peer Review Committee PDF full book. Access full book title Report of the NIH Peer Review Committee by National Institutes of Health (U.S.). Peer Review Committee. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: National Institutes of Health (U.S.). Peer Review Committee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Peer review of research grant proposals
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Institutes of Health (U.S.). Peer Review Committee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Peer review of research grant proposals
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: NIH Peer Grants Review Study Team (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medical research
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: NIH Peer Grants Review Study Team (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medical research
Languages : en
Pages : 168
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: NIH Grants Peer Review Study Team (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medical research
Languages : en
Pages : 378
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Institute of Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309164257
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 267
Get Book Here
Book Description
Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information that compares health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor quality. There are no universally accepted standards for developing systematic reviews leading to variability in how conflicts of interest and biases are handled, how evidence is appraised, and the overall scientific rigor of the process. In Finding What Works in Health Care the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends 21 standards for developing high-quality systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. The standards address the entire systematic review process from the initial steps of formulating the topic and building the review team to producing a detailed final report that synthesizes what the evidence shows and where knowledge gaps remain. Finding What Works in Health Care also proposes a framework for improving the quality of the science underpinning systematic reviews. This book will serve as a vital resource for both sponsors and producers of systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research.
Author: National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to medical research
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309450047
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 165
Get Book Here
Book Description
The medical research landscape in the United States is supported by a variety of organizations that spend billions of dollars in government and private funds each year to seek answers to complex medical and public health problems. The largest government funder is the National Institutes of Health (NIH), followed by the Department of Defense (DoD). Almost half of DoD's medical research funding is administered by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP). The mission of CDMRP is to foster innovative approaches to medical research in response to the needs of its stakeholdersâ€"the U.S. military, their families, the American public, and Congress. CDMRP funds medical research to be performed by other government and nongovernmental organizations, but it does not conduct research itself. The major focus of CDMRP funded research is the improved prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases, injuries, or conditions that affect service members and their families, and the general public. The hallmarks of CDMRP include reviewing applications for research funding using a two-tiered review process, and involving consumers throughout the process. Evaluation of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs Review Process evaluates the CDMRP two-tiered peer review process, its coordination of research priorities with NIH and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and provides recommendations on how the process for reviewing and selecting studies can be improved.
Author: NIH Peer Grants Review Study Team (U.S.).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Grants-in-aid
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Institutes of Health (U.S.). Division of Research Grants
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Federal aid to medical research
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
