Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Fees PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Fees PDF full book. Access full book title Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Fees by Kevin Holland. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Kevin Holland
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Regulations requiring the disclosure of fees paid to an auditor for audit and non-audit services (NAS) respond to concerns that such payments are potentially detrimental to auditors' actual or perceived independence. Although empirical studies have failed to produce unequivocal evidence of detrimental effects on auditor independence, the actions of regulators, audit firms and companies are consistent with the belief that economic bonding generated by fees can impair perceived levels of auditor independence.Using a sample of UK companies over a six year period to March 2006, we study perceived impairment of auditor independence by examining the relationship between levels of total relative fees (combined audit and NAS fees payable by a company to its auditor as a proportion of the audit firm's UK income) and market value. The paper's methodological innovation is its use of a valuation framework in this setting. A further contribution lies in dropping the assumption of linearity found in most prior empirical studies. We provide evidence that shareholders perceive a threat to auditor independence only at high total relative fee levels. At lower levels, total relative fees are positively related to company value. These results suggest that disclosure of NAS and audit fees are of relevance to investors, as is information about auditor income. Our results support the view that regulation by reference to the threshold at which total relative fees are perceived negatively is more consistent with investor preferences than prohibition of the supply of NAS by auditors to their audit clients.
Author: Kevin Holland
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Regulations requiring the disclosure of fees paid to an auditor for audit and non-audit services (NAS) respond to concerns that such payments are potentially detrimental to auditors' actual or perceived independence. Although empirical studies have failed to produce unequivocal evidence of detrimental effects on auditor independence, the actions of regulators, audit firms and companies are consistent with the belief that economic bonding generated by fees can impair perceived levels of auditor independence.Using a sample of UK companies over a six year period to March 2006, we study perceived impairment of auditor independence by examining the relationship between levels of total relative fees (combined audit and NAS fees payable by a company to its auditor as a proportion of the audit firm's UK income) and market value. The paper's methodological innovation is its use of a valuation framework in this setting. A further contribution lies in dropping the assumption of linearity found in most prior empirical studies. We provide evidence that shareholders perceive a threat to auditor independence only at high total relative fee levels. At lower levels, total relative fees are positively related to company value. These results suggest that disclosure of NAS and audit fees are of relevance to investors, as is information about auditor income. Our results support the view that regulation by reference to the threshold at which total relative fees are perceived negatively is more consistent with investor preferences than prohibition of the supply of NAS by auditors to their audit clients.
Author: Aloke Ghosh
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
This study investigates investor perceptions, proxied by earnings response coefficients (ERCs), of auditor independence-in-appearance as a function of audit and non-audit fees. For a sample of 8,940 firm-years over the 2000-2002 period, we find in separate regressions that ERCs are negatively associated with the ratio of non-audit to total fees (non-audit fee ratio) and with client importance (auditors' fees from a given client divided by auditor's total revenues). When we include both in the same regression, however, only client importance remains significantly associated with ERCs. Thus our results contradict the commonly-held belief (SEC 1978, 1979, Earnscliffe Research and Communications, 1999) that perceived auditor independence is a function of the non-audit fee ratio. We also fail to find a statistically significant change in ERCs when non-audit fees increase or decrease by at least 30 percent between successive years; this result fails to support the conjecture (Coffee 2004) that investors interpret non-audit fee changes as quot;bribes or punishmentsquot; by clients.
Author: Christiane Strohm
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 3835091158
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 247
Get Book Here
Book Description
Christiane Strohm investigates the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley-Act and the revised 8th EU-Directive on auditing. She shows that there is a difference in the communication and safeguarding effects of a regulation, depending on the precision of its wording and that safeguarding effects also depend on auditors' monetary incentives and on perceived costs of litigation.
Author: Richard M. Frankel
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780666794659
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from The Relation Between Auditors' Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Quality This paper provides empirical evidence on the relation between non-audit services and earnings quality. We test hypotheses concerning: (1) the association between a firm's purchase of non-audit services from its auditor and earnings management, and (2) the stock price reaction to the disclosure of non-audit fees. In the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the proportion of fee revenue auditors derive from non-audit services, yet we know little about how non-audit services are related to earnings quality.1 Concern about the effect of non-audit services on the financial reporting process was a primary motivation for the Securities and Exchange Commission (sec) to issue revised auditor independence rules on November 15, 2000. The rules require firms to disclose the amount of all audit and non-audit fees paid to its auditor. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: Harold Lopez
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
The audit market comprises a small group of large firms and a big group of smaller firms. We build upon the classic model presented by Magee and Tseng (1990) to shed light on auditor market structure. In particular, we focus on the perceived reputation cost borne by auditors that agree with managers on controversial accounting issues. We claim that when perceived reputation cost depends on the weight of a specific client relative to total income, larger audit firms can charge higher fees for the same audits, and clients are willing to pay those higher fees due to the premium paid by investors when audits are perceived to be of higher quality. Moreover, we find that market concentration produces a suboptimal output in which client firms cannot choose the auditor that maximizes their profits, and auditors cannot extract the maximum potential surplus, producing a social loss in the audit market.
Author: Michael Dobler
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Purpose - The aim of this paper is to provide evidence on the extent and the consequences of the provision of non-audit services (NAS) by statutory auditors to German family firms.Design/methodology/approach - The study analyzes hand collected fee data of 368 listed and private family firms in Germany. It employs univariate tests, OLS and 2SLS regressions to investigate potential threats to perceived auditor independence and knowledge spillovers between jointly provided NAS and audit services.Findings - Incumbent auditors are shown to be a significant source of various types of NAS to family firms. There is weak evidence on threats to perceived auditor independence and support for reciprocal knowledge spillovers between the services. While listed and private family firms do not differ in regard to the proportion of NAS fees, comparative findings suggest that key threats and benefits of jointly provided services are more prevalent among private than among listed family firms.Research limitations/implications - The study suffers from limited data availability and is restricted to the initial year of mandatory audit fee disclosure of private firms in Germany. Particularities of family firms and the German setting as well as differential results for listed and private family firms suggest fruitful avenues for future research.Practical implications - The study addresses current issues in audit regulation. Regulatory bodies should consider that key threats and benefits of auditor-provided NAS decrease with stronger exogenous restrictions. Attempts to restrict jointly provided services in the EU suggest family firms to reconsider their reliance on auditors as a trusted source of NAS.Originality/value - This study is the first to provide evidence on the extent and consequences of auditor-provided NAS in family firms based on fee disclosure. It is also among the few studies that investigate private firms in a code law country and complements prior evidence from Germany that is restricted to listed firms. More generally, it contributes to limited evidence at the intersection of audit and family business research.
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428938915
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 57
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jayanthi Krishnan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
A number of recent studies examine whether the joint provision of audit and non-audit services (NAS) impairs auditor independence, and yield mixed results. We examine whether investors perceive auditor independence as being impaired when auditors supply non-audit services, by investigating the association between fee-based measures of non-audit service purchases and the earnings response coefficient (ERC). We find that the non-audit fee-ratio and the level of non-audit fees were negatively associated with ERCs in 2001. When we use unexpected fees (a measure of over- or under-payment of nonaudit fees), we find a negative association between NAS purchases and ERC, but this occurs mainly in the second and third quarters following the release of the proxy. Further investigation reveals that the quarterly differences may be driven by the increasing flow of information (i.e., the first-time disclosures of fees and media analyses of these disclosures) that became available to investors during our sample period. We speculate that, during the course of the year 2001, the increase in information allowed investors to engage in better comparative analyses of the fee disclosures. We interpret our results as indicating that investors did perceive NAS as impairing auditor independence.
Author: Jere R. Francis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Get Book Here
Book Description
We investigate if the SEC's mandated disclosure of fees for audit and nonaudit services affected the market's perception of auditor independence and earnings quality. Following the initial fee disclosures, we find that the market valuation of quarterly earnings surprises (earnings response coefficient) is significantly lower for firms with high levels of nonaudit fees than for firms with low levels of nonaudit fees. In contrast, in the year prior to the new fee disclosures, there was no reduction in earnings response coefficients for firms that subsequently reported high nonaudit fees. Our evidence suggests that mandated fee disclosures provided new information and was viewed by the market as lowering the perception of auditor independence and earnings quality.
Author: Martin Bugeja
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 39
Get Book Here
Book Description
This study investigates if there is a positive association between takeover premiums and the bidder's perception of target firm auditor reputation and independence. Using auditor size as a proxy for audit reputation, the results indicate that target shareholders receive a higher takeover premium when a Big 4 auditor audits the target firm in the year prior to the takeover announcement. This result is only significant however in the period prior to the highly publicised audit failures. The impact of perceived auditor independence on takeover premiums is studied using the levels and size of non-audit service (NAS) fees provided by the target firm auditor. Using three proxies for auditor independence, the results do not show an association between perceived auditor independence and takeover premiums. This finding is robust to partitioning the sample by auditor size, takeover hostility and splitting the sample into takeovers pre- and post- the increased regulatory focus on the provision of NAS by auditors.
