Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Closing Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Closing Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites PDF full book. Access full book title Defense Base Realignment and Closure Budget Data for Closing Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California, and Realigning Projects to Various Sites by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of seven projects, valued at $21.4 million, associated with the closure of Naval Air Station Cecil Field, Florida, and the realignment of aircraft and dedicated personnel, equipment, and support services to Naval Air Station Oceana, Virginia; Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina; and Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina. Audit Results. For the seven projects, the Navy did not adequately determine the scope and the most economical way to accommodate the assigned mission. As a result, seven projects, estimated to cost $21.4 million, could not be validated and are therefore questionable. However, an economic analysis provided in response to a draft of this report, completed April 8, 1994, by the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Services Operations) validated one project for $3.1 million. See the finding in Part II for details.
Author: United States. Dept. of Defense. Office of the Inspector General
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. The specific objectives were to determine whether the proposed projects were valid base realignment and closure requirements, whether the decision for military construction was supported with required documentation including an economic analysis, and whether the analysis considered existing facilities. The audit also evaluated the implementation of the DoD Internal Management Control Program and assessed the adequacy of applicable internal controls.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
We are providing this report for your information and use. Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991, states that the Inspector General, DoD, must evaluate significant increases in Defense base realignment and closure (BRAC) military construction (MILCON) project costs over estimated costs provided to the Commission on Defense Base Closure and Realignment (the Commission) and send a report to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports about FY 1996 base realignment and closure military construction costs. This report discusses project P-298T, "Missile Magazines, '1 valued at $5.1 million, and project P-300T, "Parking Garage," valued at $14.4 million, resulting from the closure of Naval Air Station Alameda, California, and realignment to Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (PSNS), Washington.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Introduction. The audit was directed by Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991. The Public Law states that the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the amount of the authorization requested by DoD for each military construction project associated with base realignment and closure actions does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Base Closure and Realignment Commission (the Commission). The Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the differences between the original project cost estimate provided to the Commission and the requested budget amount. The Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each military construction project for which a significant difference exists and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports relating to FY 1994 military construction costs for realigning and closing bases.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of seven projects, valued at $46.9 million, for the realignment of the Naval Air Station Miramar, California, to Naval Air Station Fallon, Nevada. The audit also reviewed applicable internal controls.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991, directs the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the amount of the authorization that DoD requested for each military construction project associated with Defense base realignment and closure does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Commission on Defense Base Closure and Realignment (the Commission). If the requested budget amounts exceed the original project cost estimates provided to the Commission, the Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the differences. The Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each Defense base realignment and closure military construction project for which a significant difference exists from the original cost estimate and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. This report is one in a series of reports about FY 1996 Defense base realignment and closure military construction costs. The overall audit objective was to determine the accuracy of Defense base realignment and closure military construction budget data. This report provides the results of the audit of one project, valued at $1.7 million, to renovate building 378 located at Naval Aviation Depot North Island, California. The audit also assessed the adequacy of the management control program as it applied to the audit objectives.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report is one in a series about FY 1997 Defense base realignment and closure military construction costs. It discusses a FY 1996 project submitted too late to be included in our audit of FY 1996 budget data. Public Law 102-190, "National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993," December 5, 1991, directs the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the amount of the authorization that DoD requested for each military construction project associated with Defense base realignment and closure does not exceed the original estimated cost provided to the Commission on Defense Base Closure and Realignment (the Commission). If the requested budget amounts exceed the original project cost estimates provided to the Commission, the Secretary of Defense is required to explain to Congress the reasons for the differences. The Office of the Inspector General, DoD, is required to review each Defense base realignment and closure military construction project for which a significant difference exists from the original cost estimate and to provide the results of the review to the congressional Defense committees. We expanded our audit to include all projects valued at more than $1 million.
