Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Brief of the California Defendants to Accompany Their Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Brief of the California Defendants to Accompany Their Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Author: California
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Brief of the California Defendants to Accompany Their Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [of The] State of Arizona, Complainant, V. State of California
Author: Arizona
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
State of Arizona, Complainant, V. State of California ... [et Al.], Defendants
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Proposed by the California Defendants
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October Term 1958, No. 9 Original
Author: Simon Hirsch Rifkind
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages : 201
Book Description
Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages : 201
Book Description
Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author).
Arizona V. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)
Author: Simon Hirsch Rifkind
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages : 215
Book Description
Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages : 215
Book Description
Case summary: "Arizona v. California was a 12-year epic battle including three years of trial in front of a special master appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The trial involved 106 witnesses and hundreds of volumes of exhibits, ultimately producing a 433-page final report from the Master in December of 1960. Proceedings at the U.S. Supreme Court required two oral arguments, producing a 5-3 decision in 1963 with two dissenting opinions, with the majority opinion implemented by a decree in 1964. The case was an original action in the U.S. Supreme Court, with Arizona seeking to clarify its rights to the use of Colorado River basin water. It was filed 30 years after the seven basin states drafted the Colorado River Compact, which apportioned the waters of the basin roughly equally between the states of the Upper and Lower Divisions, but did not apportion shares to individual states. In addition to Arizona and California, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah were party to the case because they had lands located within the Lower Basin. The United States was also party to the case because of the federal water projects and lands located within the Lower Basin. It was perhaps the most high profile water case ever to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court and produced considerable commentary."-- Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Arizona v. California Revisited, 52 Nat. Resources J. 363, 365-66 (2012) (quoted with permission of the author).
In the Supreme Court of the United States, October Term 1958, No. 9 Original
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Colorado River (Colo.-Mexico)
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
California. Court of Appeal (1st Appellate District). Records and Briefs
Author: California (State).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Book Description
State of Arizona, Complainant, V. State of California, Palo Verde Irrigation District, Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley County Water District, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, City of Los Angeles, City of San Diego, and County of San Diego, Defendants, United States of America and State of Nevada, Interveners, State of New Mexico and State of Utah, Parties
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Book Description