Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Income tax
Languages : en
Pages : 908
Book Description
Publication
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Income tax
Languages : en
Pages : 908
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Income tax
Languages : en
Pages : 908
Book Description
Antitrust Law Journal
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 964
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 964
Book Description
The Journal of the Assembly During the ... Session of the Legislature of the State of California
Author: California. Legislature. Assembly
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : California
Languages : en
Pages : 1684
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : California
Languages : en
Pages : 1684
Book Description
Searching the Law - The States
Author: Francis R Doyle
Publisher: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
ISBN: 9004531149
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 695
Book Description
Publisher: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
ISBN: 9004531149
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 695
Book Description
Catalogue of Title-entries of Books and Other Articles Entered in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, Under the Copyright Law ... Wherein the Copyright Has Been Completed by the Deposit of Two Copies in the Office
Author: Library of Congress. Copyright Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : American drama
Languages : en
Pages : 616
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : American drama
Languages : en
Pages : 616
Book Description
ABA Journal
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
The ABA Journal serves the legal profession. Qualified recipients are lawyers and judges, law students, law librarians and associate members of the American Bar Association.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
The ABA Journal serves the legal profession. Qualified recipients are lawyers and judges, law students, law librarians and associate members of the American Bar Association.
Psychology And Social Policy
Author: Peter Suedfeld
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISBN: 1317740297
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 392
Book Description
This work explores the application of psychological data and theories to controversial policy issues such as racial and gender inequality, violence and criminal justice. The book also asks whether psychology really has relevant expertise to contribute. First published in 1992. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISBN: 1317740297
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 392
Book Description
This work explores the application of psychological data and theories to controversial policy issues such as racial and gender inequality, violence and criminal justice. The book also asks whether psychology really has relevant expertise to contribute. First published in 1992. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
Resource Guide to Literature on Barrier-free Environments, with Selected Annotations
Author: Info-Systems, Inc
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Architecture and the handicapped
Languages : en
Pages : 296
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Architecture and the handicapped
Languages : en
Pages : 296
Book Description
Resource Guide to Literature on Barrier-free Environments, with Selected Annotations
Author: Systems Group
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Architecture and the handicapped
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Architecture and the handicapped
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Book Description
Injustice in Person
Author: Rabeea Assy
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 0191511145
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Book Description
In common law jurisdictions, litigants are free to choose whether to procure legal representation or litigate in person. There is no formal requirement that civil litigants obtain legal representation, and the court has no power to impose it on them, regardless of whether the litigant has the financial means to hire a lawyer or is capable of conducting litigation effectively. Self-representation is considered indispensable even in circumstances of extreme abuse of process, such as in 'vexatious litigation'. Intriguingly, although self-representation is regarded as sacrosanct in common law jurisdictions, most civil law systems take a diametrically opposite view and impose obligations of legal representation as a condition for conducting civil litigation, except in low-value claims courts or specific tribunals. This disparity presents a conundrum in comparative law: an unfettered freedom to proceed in person is afforded in those legal systems that are more reliant on the litigants' professional skills and whose rules of procedure and evidence are more formal, complex, and adversarial, whereas legal representation tends to be made obligatory in systems that are judge-based and offer more flexible and informal procedures, which would seem, intuitively, to be more conducive to self-representation. In Injustice in Person: The Right to Self Representation, Rabeea Assy assesses the theoretical value of self-representation, and challenges the conventional wisdom that this should be a fundamental right. With a fresh perspective, Assy develops a novel justification for mandatory legal representation, exploring a number of issues such as the requirements placed by the liberal commitment to personal autonomy on the civil justice system; the utility of plain English projects and the extent to which they render the law accessible to lay people; and the idea that a high degree of litigant control over the proceedings enhances litigants' subjective perceptions of procedural fairness. On a practical level, the book discusses the question of mandatory representation against the case law of English and American courts and also that of the European Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and the Human Rights Committee.
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 0191511145
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 332
Book Description
In common law jurisdictions, litigants are free to choose whether to procure legal representation or litigate in person. There is no formal requirement that civil litigants obtain legal representation, and the court has no power to impose it on them, regardless of whether the litigant has the financial means to hire a lawyer or is capable of conducting litigation effectively. Self-representation is considered indispensable even in circumstances of extreme abuse of process, such as in 'vexatious litigation'. Intriguingly, although self-representation is regarded as sacrosanct in common law jurisdictions, most civil law systems take a diametrically opposite view and impose obligations of legal representation as a condition for conducting civil litigation, except in low-value claims courts or specific tribunals. This disparity presents a conundrum in comparative law: an unfettered freedom to proceed in person is afforded in those legal systems that are more reliant on the litigants' professional skills and whose rules of procedure and evidence are more formal, complex, and adversarial, whereas legal representation tends to be made obligatory in systems that are judge-based and offer more flexible and informal procedures, which would seem, intuitively, to be more conducive to self-representation. In Injustice in Person: The Right to Self Representation, Rabeea Assy assesses the theoretical value of self-representation, and challenges the conventional wisdom that this should be a fundamental right. With a fresh perspective, Assy develops a novel justification for mandatory legal representation, exploring a number of issues such as the requirements placed by the liberal commitment to personal autonomy on the civil justice system; the utility of plain English projects and the extent to which they render the law accessible to lay people; and the idea that a high degree of litigant control over the proceedings enhances litigants' subjective perceptions of procedural fairness. On a practical level, the book discusses the question of mandatory representation against the case law of English and American courts and also that of the European Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and the Human Rights Committee.