Relationships Between Local School District Unification in California and the Financial Support of Public Education PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Relationships Between Local School District Unification in California and the Financial Support of Public Education PDF full book. Access full book title Relationships Between Local School District Unification in California and the Financial Support of Public Education by Daniel Koppel Freudenthal. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Daniel Koppel Freudenthal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 532
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Daniel Koppel Freudenthal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 532
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Californie. Department of education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : School districts
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: California. State Reconstruction and Reemployment Commission. Citizens advisory committee on readjustment education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : School management and organization
Languages : en
Pages : 138
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Margaret Weston
Publisher: Public Policy Instit. of CA
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 21
Get Book Here
Book Description
Governor Jerry Brown's January 2011 budget proposal suggests shifting responsibility and funding for many state programs from the state to the local level. Under this "realignment" of government authority, local governments--usually counties--would be given responsibility for providing the services in realigned programs, and the state would provide local governments with a source of funding for the new responsibilities. In addition, local governments would be granted the authority to reshape realigned programs to better accommodate local conditions and priorities. Although k-12 education is not included in the governor's realignment proposal, similar themes apply to the current discussions and legislation pertaining to California's school finance system. This report examines California's school finance system through the lens of realignment, offering a framework for thinking about how k-12 realignment might work and the difficulties it might face. Certainly there are arguments on both sides of the equation. Proponents of greater local control argue that local school authorities have a better knowledge than state officials of the unique needs in their districts and that greater local control would reduce the administrative burden on schools and enable them to redirect their resources toward improving student outcomes. Those in favor of maintaining state control argue that central control allows the state to ensure its priorities are met across individual districts and that students in all districts, regardless of their size or location, are provided with similar educational opportunities. This study examines the trade-offs of each approach, concluding that thoughtful revisions in the state's categorical funding system would offer a good first step in moving toward a more productive, efficient, and transparent school finance system. (Contains 2 figures and 4 footnotes.) [Additional funding for this report was provided by the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund.].
Author: Christina Eleanor Murdoch Mills
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780355451108
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
In the past five years, the California State Legislature and State Board of Education have enacted comprehensive, statewide reforms of K-12 public education that have created a new system of funding, curriculum standards, standardized testing, and accountability in California school districts. Local Control and Accountability Plans (LCAPs) were developed under the new policy, linking accountability to district planning with a focus on growth and improvement. This LCAP study uses a mixed methods approach to addresses the following three questions: 1. What goals, programs and services are identified in a sample of LCAPs from fifty-one Unified School Districts with high percentages of low SES students in California? 2. What are the similarities and differences between the goals, programs and services of relatively high and low performing schools districts in this sample? 3. Are the goals, programs and services in school district LCAPs consistent with what the academic literature on school improvement suggests districts focus on in order to improve? Educational research literature supports much of the new LCAP policy in California education, particularly the studies of organizational change, leadership and school districts as systems. The most effective education systems exhibit coherence at all levels of the system (Fullan, 2015). Importantly, what emerged from my study was that overall a limited number of significant differences can be identified when comparing the LCAP goals and programs of high and low performing districts. However, the LCAP data does suggest that a handful of statistically significant differences exist between how high performing and low performing unified school districts define their goals, programs and services in LCAPs. The LCAP as a tool has some potential to inform the public, policymakers and district leaders about how school improvement efforts are unfolding in California. Findings from the sampled LCAPs in this study suggest the following: relatively high performing school districts focus more on professional development and development of an instructional system than low performing districts do. High performing districts also have a greater focus on low-income students. Conversely, low performing district LCAPs focus more on counseling and behavioral support and family engagement. While high and low performing districts have different approaches to narrowly focused programs, specifically career technical education (CTE) and summer school programs, this study provides an exploration of the relationship between identified needs and strategic focus as well as how these factors relate to the research literature.
Author: Arthur J. Townley
Publisher: Kendall Hunt
ISBN: 9780757515842
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 252
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Edward Joseph Anderson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: University of California, Berkeley. Graduate Division, Northern Section
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 910
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: California. State Commission on School Districts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Schools
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher: Hippocrene Books
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 228
Get Book Here
Book Description
This handbook describes procedures for school-district reorganization in California. Following the introductory chapter, chapter 2 offers a historical overview of school-district reorganization in California. Chapters 3 and 4 outline the organization and responsibilities of the county committee and the role and responsibilities of the State Board of Education. The fifth chapter provides a step-by-step process of forming or abolishing school districts, consolidating school districts, transferring territory, and unifying school districts. A series of flowcharts explain the 25 percent petition, the 10 percent petition, the state criteria for approvals, and the guidelines for administering the California Environmental Quality Act regulations. Chapter 6 details the requirements of the Education Code Section 35753 governing reorganization proposals. Chapter 7 lists the various effects of a district organizational change on a school district and its employees, property, funds, obligations, bond indebtedness, and revenue limit. The requirements for elections and public hearings are listed in the eighth chapter. Chapters 9 and 10 describe the new governing board and its operations and other functions of the county committee. The final two chapter summarize the appeals process related to transfers of territory and procedures for reorganizing community colleges. Appendices contain state regulations; a list of chartered counties, cities, and school districts; and sample forms. (LMI)
