Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
52073
People v. Williams, 383 MICH 118 (1970)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
52073
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
52073
People v. Herrera, 383 MICH 49 (1970)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Book Description
52115
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Book Description
52115
People v. Thompson, 424 MICH 118 (1985)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Book Description
73206
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Book Description
73206
People v. Danny Williams, 383 MICH 549 (1970)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
52427 1⁄2
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Book Description
52427 1⁄2
People v. Szczytko, 390 MICH 278 (1973)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
54132
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
54132
People v. Merritt, 396 MICH 67 (1976)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
54874
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
54874
Michigan Compiled Laws Service
Author: Michigan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 584
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 584
Book Description
North western reporter. Second series. N.W. 2d. Cases argued and determined in the courts of Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1056
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1056
Book Description
Michigan Pleading and Practice
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Civil procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 834
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Civil procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 834
Book Description
Keeping the People's Liberties
Author: John J. Dinan
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 070063147X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 277
Book Description
Which branch of government should be entrusted with safeguarding individual rights? Conventional wisdom assigns this responsibility to the courts, on the grounds that liberty can only be protected through judicial interpretation of bills of rights. In fact it is difficult for many people even to conceive of any other way that rights might be protected. John Dinan challenges this understanding by tracing and evaluating the different methods that have been used to protect rights in the United States from the founding until the present era. By examining legislative statutes, judicial decisions, convention proceedings, and popular initiatives in four representative states-Massachusetts, Virginia, Michigan, and Oregon-Dinan shows that rights have been secured in the American polity in three principal ways. Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, rights were protected primarily through representative institutions. Then in the early twentieth century, citizens began to turn to direct democratic institutions to secure their rights. It was not until the mid-twentieth century that judges came to be seen as the chief protectors of liberties. By analyzing the relative ability of legislators, citizens, and judges to serve as guardians of rights, Dinan's study demonstrates that each is capable of securing certain rights in certain situations. Elected representatives are generally capable of protecting most rights, but popular initiatives provide an effective mechanism for securing rights in the face of legislative intransigence, and judicial decisions offer a superior means of protecting liberties in crisis times. Accordingly, rather than viewing rights protection as the peculiar province of any single institution, this task ought to be considered the proper responsibility of all these institutions. By undertaking a comparison of these institutional methods across such a wide expanse of time, Keeping the People's Liberties makes a highly original contribution to the literature on rights protection and provides a new perspective on debates about the contemporary role of representative, populist, and judicial institutions.
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 070063147X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 277
Book Description
Which branch of government should be entrusted with safeguarding individual rights? Conventional wisdom assigns this responsibility to the courts, on the grounds that liberty can only be protected through judicial interpretation of bills of rights. In fact it is difficult for many people even to conceive of any other way that rights might be protected. John Dinan challenges this understanding by tracing and evaluating the different methods that have been used to protect rights in the United States from the founding until the present era. By examining legislative statutes, judicial decisions, convention proceedings, and popular initiatives in four representative states-Massachusetts, Virginia, Michigan, and Oregon-Dinan shows that rights have been secured in the American polity in three principal ways. Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, rights were protected primarily through representative institutions. Then in the early twentieth century, citizens began to turn to direct democratic institutions to secure their rights. It was not until the mid-twentieth century that judges came to be seen as the chief protectors of liberties. By analyzing the relative ability of legislators, citizens, and judges to serve as guardians of rights, Dinan's study demonstrates that each is capable of securing certain rights in certain situations. Elected representatives are generally capable of protecting most rights, but popular initiatives provide an effective mechanism for securing rights in the face of legislative intransigence, and judicial decisions offer a superior means of protecting liberties in crisis times. Accordingly, rather than viewing rights protection as the peculiar province of any single institution, this task ought to be considered the proper responsibility of all these institutions. By undertaking a comparison of these institutional methods across such a wide expanse of time, Keeping the People's Liberties makes a highly original contribution to the literature on rights protection and provides a new perspective on debates about the contemporary role of representative, populist, and judicial institutions.