New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe PDF full book. Access full book title New Challenges to Constitutional Adjudication in Europe by Zoltán Szente. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Zoltán Szente
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1351674749
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Get Book
Book Description
In the past few years, constitutional courts have been presented with new challenges. The world financial crisis, the new wave of terrorism, mass migration and other country-specific problems have had wide-ranging effects on the old and embedded constitutional standards and judicial constructions. This book examines how, if at all, these unprecedented social, economic and political problems have affected constitutional review in Europe. As the courts’ response must conform with EU law and in some cases international law, analysis extends to the related jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. The collection adopts a common analytical structure to examine how the relevant challenges have been addressed in ten country specific case studies. Alongside these, constitutional experts frame the research within the theoretical understanding of the constitutional difficulties of the day in Europe. Finally, a comparative chapter examines the effects of multilevel constitutionalism and identifies general European trends. This book will be essential reading for academics and researchers working in the areas of constitutional law, comparative law and jurisprudence.
Author: Zoltán Szente
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1351674749
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Get Book
Book Description
In the past few years, constitutional courts have been presented with new challenges. The world financial crisis, the new wave of terrorism, mass migration and other country-specific problems have had wide-ranging effects on the old and embedded constitutional standards and judicial constructions. This book examines how, if at all, these unprecedented social, economic and political problems have affected constitutional review in Europe. As the courts’ response must conform with EU law and in some cases international law, analysis extends to the related jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. The collection adopts a common analytical structure to examine how the relevant challenges have been addressed in ten country specific case studies. Alongside these, constitutional experts frame the research within the theoretical understanding of the constitutional difficulties of the day in Europe. Finally, a comparative chapter examines the effects of multilevel constitutionalism and identifies general European trends. This book will be essential reading for academics and researchers working in the areas of constitutional law, comparative law and jurisprudence.
Author: Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1000386228
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 309
Get Book
Book Description
This book explores the relationship between populism or populist regimes and constitutional interpretation used in those regimes. The volume discusses the question of whether contemporary populist governments and movements have developed, or encouraged new and specific constitutional theories, doctrines and methods of interpretation, or whether their constitutional and other high courts continue to use the old, traditional interpretative tools in constitutional adjudication. The book is divided into four parts. Part I contains three chapters elaborating the theoretical basis for the discussion. Part II examines the topic from a comparative perspective, representing those European countries where populism is most prevalent, including Austria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Part III extends the focus to the United States, reflecting how American jurisprudence and academia have produced the most important contributions to the theory of constitutional interpretation, and how recent political developments in that country might challenge the traditional understanding of judicial review. This section also includes a general overview on Latin America, where there are also some populist governments and strong populist movements. Finally, the editors’ closing study analyses the outcomes of the comparative research, summarizing the conclusions of the book. Written by renowned national constitutional scholars, the book will be essential reading for students, academics and researchers working in Constitutional Law and Politics. Chapter 1 of this book is freely available as a downloadable Open Access PDF at http://www.taylorfrancis.com under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
Author: Armin von Bogdandy
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0192846698
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 721
Get Book
Book Description
The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law series describes and analyzes the public law of the European legal space, an area that encompasses not only the law of the European Union but also the European Convention on Human Rights and, importantly, the domestic public laws of European states. Recognizing that the ongoing vertical and horizontal processes of European integration render legal comparison the task of our time for both scholars and practitioners, the project aims to foster a better understanding of the specific European legal pluralism and, ultimately, to contribute to the legitimacy and efficiency of European public law. The first volume of the series began this endeavour with an appraisal of the evolution of the state and its administration, offering both cross-cutting contributions and specific country reports. The third volume (the second in chronological terms) continues this approach with an in-depth appraisal of constitutional adjudication in various and diverse European countries. Fourteen country reports and two cross-cutting contributions investigate the antecedents, foundations, organization, procedure, and specific approach to constitutional issues throughout the Continent. The fourth volume now compares European constitutional jurisdiction in the European legal space. It examines the structures of the organization, the appointment of judges, the procedures and the methods of argumentation and interpretation, their impact on state and society, their legitimacy as well as their role in the division of powers, and thus completes the picture following the country reports in Volume III. This comparative perspective is supplemented by an examination that illustrates the relationship with the ECJ, the ECtHR, and the Venice Commission as well as their (constitutional) function. Finally, Constitutional Adjudication: Common Themes and Challenges is devoted to the challenges constitutional jurisdiction in the European judicial area is currently facing. The historical, political, and theoretical foundations as well as the basic dogmatic features of constitutional jurisdiction are presented in such a way that the discussion about its role and further development in this legal space is sustainably stimulated.
Author: José María Beneyto
Publisher: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Mbh & Company
ISBN: 9783832967246
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 415
Get Book
Book Description
This collection contains contributions to an international conference held in Madrid in October 2010. It is based on the view that the European Union and its constitutional law cannot be isolated from its Member States and their respective constitutions, which are part of European constitutional law, and that the case law of the national courts, in particular the constitutional and supreme courts of the Member States, needs to be considered as much as the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. It is important to give particular attention to the relevant national constitutional courts' jurisprudence when analyzing European constitutional law. The book demonstrates the seriousness and theoretical depth of the thoughts developed by these courts to grasp the EU's construction and its relation to the Member States, the concepts of primacy of European law, sovereignty and national identity, democracy, and citizens' rights. The comparison of recent case law of the constitutional and supreme courts shows great divergences in concepts and terms, but it makes visible also an emerging dialogue among the courts. (Series: European Constitutional Law Network - Vol. 8)
Author: Wojciech Sadurski
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9789041118837
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 472
Get Book
Book Description
How can the power of constitutional judges to overturn parliamentary choices on the basis of their own reading of the constitution, be reconciled with fundamental democratic principles which assign the supreme role in the political system to parliaments? This time-honoured question acquired a new significance when the post-commumst countries of Central and Eastern Europe, without exception, adopted constitutional models in which constitutional courts play a very significant role, at least in theory. Can we learn something about the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism in general, from the meteoric rise of constitutional tribunals in the post-communist countries? Can the discussions and controversies relating to constitutional review which have been going on for decades in more established democracies illuminate the sources of the strength of constitutional courts in Central and Eastern Europe? These questions lie at the center of this book, which focuses on the question of constitutional review in postcommunist states, from a theoretical and comparative perspective. The chapters contained in the book outline the conceptual framework for analyzing the sources, the role and the legitimacy of constitutional justice in a system of political democracy. From this perspective, it assesses the experience of constitutional justice in the West (where the model originated) and in Central and Eastern Europe, where the model has been implanted after the fail of Communism.
Author: Wojciech Sadurski
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 140203007X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 388
Get Book
Book Description
Challenging the conventional wisdom that constitutional courts are the best device that democratic systems have for the protection of individual rights, Wojciech Sadurski examines the most recent wave of activist constitutional courts: those that have emerged after the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. In contrast to most other analysts and scholars he does not take for granted that they are a "force for the good", but rather subjects them to critical scrutiny.
Author: José María Beneyto Pérez
Publisher:
ISBN: 9783845233109
Category :
Languages : de
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Víctor Ferreres Comella
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 0300148682
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 254
Get Book
Book Description
Víctor Ferreres Comella contrasts the European 'centralised' constitutional court model, in which one court system is used to adjudicate constitutional questions, with a decentralised model such as that of the United States, in which courts deal with both constitutional and non-constitutional questions.
Author: Vittoria Barsotti
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1000217477
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 407
Get Book
Book Description
This collection adopts a distinctive method and structure to introduce the work of Italian constitutional law scholars into the Anglophone dialogue while also bringing a number of prominent non-Italian constitutional law scholars to study and write about constitutional justice in a global context. The work presents six distinct areas of particular interest from a comparative constitutional perspective: first, the role of legal scholarship in the work of constitutional courts; second, structures and processes that contribute to more “open” or “closed” styles of constitutional adjudication; third, pros and cons of collegiality in the work of constitutional courts; fourth, forms of access by individuals to constitutional justice; fifth, methods of constitutional interpretation; and sixth, the relationship between national constitutional adjudication and the transnational context. In each of these six areas, the volume sets up a new and genuine constitutional dialogue between an Italian scholar presenting a discussion and critical assessment of the specific topic, and a non-Italian scholar who responds elaborating the issue as seen from constitutional law beyond the Italian system. The resulting six such dialogues thus provide a dynamic, in-depth, multidimensional, national and transnational/comparative examination of these areas in which the `Italian style’ of constitutional adjudication has a distinctive contribution to make to comparative constitutional law in general. Fostering a deeper knowledge of the Italian Constitutional Court within the comparative global space and advancing a creative and fruitful methodological approach, the book will be fascinating reading for academics and researchers in comparative constitutional law.
Author: Henning Glaser
Publisher: Nomos Verlag
ISBN: 3845247371
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 347
Get Book
Book Description
Nachdem sich die spezialisierte Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit nach kontinentaleuropäischem Vorbild in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten außerhalb des angelsächsischen Rechtskreises global weitgehend durchgesetzt hat, haben Verfassungsgerichte in den unterschiedlichsten Verfassungsordnungen zunehmend Fragen mit weit reichenden politischen Konsequenzen entschieden. Insofern kommt in der Institution Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit die allgemeine Tendenz einer zunehmenden Verrechtlichung der Politik besonders deutlich zum Tragen. Damit ist die Rolle und Performanz von Verfassungsgerichten in der praktischen Debatte zum Teil heftigen Herausforderungen ausgesetzt und im akademischen Diskurs zu einem der interessantesten Themenfelder der letzten Jahre geworden. Trotz der gemeinsamen Wurzel unterscheiden sich die einzelnen Verfassungsgerichte teilweise erheblich hinsichtlich ihrer Rolle im Verfassungsgefüge, den ihnen durch die Verfassung zugemessenen Aufgaben, so wie praktisch ihrem tatsächlichen Einfluss und ihrer Performanz. Im Rahmen dieser Aspekte widmen sich die im vorliegenden Band versammelten Beiträge unter anderem Fragen wie der Konstitutionalisierung der Rechtsordnung durch die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit und ihrer wachsenden Politisierung. Die Beiträge beziehen sich auf die Verfassungsrechtsordnungen in Deutschland, Kambodscha, Kroatien, Indonesien, Japan, Pakistan, Polen, Spanien, Südkorea, Taiwan und Vietnam. Unter ihnen sind auch drei Beiträge, die das Phänomen aus der praktischen Perspektive von amtierenden bzw. ehemaligen Verfassungsrichtern beleuchten. Mit Beiträgen von: Slavica Banic (Richterin, Verfassungsgericht, Kroatien), Byung-Song Cho (Öffentliches Recht, Cheongju Univ., Südkorea), Jong-ik Chon (Öffentliches Recht, Seoul National Univ., Südkorea), Ingwer Ebsen (Öffentliches Recht, Univ. Frankfurt a.M., Deutschland), Robert Esser (Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Strafrecht, Univ. Passau, Deutschland), Yasuo Hasebe (Öffentliches Recht, Tokyo Univ., Japan), Matthias Jestaedt (Öffentliches Recht, Univ. Freiburg, Deutschland), Bartosz Makowicz (Öffentliches Recht, Europa Univ. Viadrina, Deutschland), Van Quang Nguyen (Öffentliches Recht, Hanoi Law University, Vietnam), Javier Garcia Roca (Öffentliches Recht, Complutense Univ. Madrid, Spanien), Osama Siddique (Verfassungsrecht, Lahore Univ. of Management Sciences, Pakistan), Son Soubert (Privy Councillor to His Majesty the King of Cambodia, Kambodscha), Heru Susetyo (Öffentliches Recht, Univ. Indonesia, Indonesien), Miroslaw Wyrzykowski (Öffentliches Recht, Univ. Warschau, Polen), Jiunn-rong Yeh (Öffentliches Recht, National Taiwan Univ., Taiwan)
