Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Mark I. Aronson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Abuse of administrative power
Languages : en
Pages : 854

Get Book Here

Book Description

Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Mark I. Aronson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Abuse of administrative power
Languages : en
Pages : 854

Get Book Here

Book Description


Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Swati Jhaveri
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1108481574
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 447

Get Book Here

Book Description
Explores the English origins of the principles of judicial review in common law jurisdictions and autochthonous pressures for their adaptation.

Judicial Control of Administrative Action

Judicial Control of Administrative Action PDF Author: Louis Leventhal Jaffe
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 816

Get Book Here

Book Description
Collection of articles on legal aspects and control of the administration of justice in the USA and examination of major aspects of the relationship between agencies of economic administration and other forms of public administration and courts of law - includes relevant jurisprudence.

Cases, Materials and Text on Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Cases, Materials and Text on Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Chr Backes
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISBN: 9781509938131
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description


De Smith's Judicial Review of Administrative Action

De Smith's Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Stanley A. De Smith
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 704

Get Book Here

Book Description


Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review PDF Author: Guobin Zhu
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 3030315398
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 445

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.

Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State

Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State PDF Author: Jurgen de Poorter
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 9462653070
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 208

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book deals with one of the greatest challenges for the judiciary in the 21st century. It reflects on the judiciary’s role in reviewing administrative discretion in the administrative state; a role that can no longer solely be understood from the traditional doctrine of the Trias Politica. Traditionally, courts review acts of administrative bodies implying a degree of discretion with quite some restraint. Typically it is reviewed whether the decision is non-arbitrary or whether there is no manifest error of assessment. The question arises though as to whether the concern regarding ensuring the non-arbitrary character of the exercise of administrative power, which is frequently performed at a distance from political bodies, goes far enough to guarantee that the administration exercises its powers in a legitimate way. This publication searches for new modes of judicial review of administrative discretion exercised in the administrative state. It links state-of-the-art academic research on the role of courts in the administrative state with the daily practice of the higher and lower administrative courts struggling with their position in the evolving administrative state. The book concludes that with the changing role and forms of the administrative state, administrative courts across the world and across sectors are in the process of reconsidering their roles and the appropriate models of judicial review. Learning from the experiences in different sectors and jurisdictions, it provides theoretical and empirical foundations for reflecting on the advantages and disadvantages of different models of review, the constitutional consequences and the main questions that deserve further research and debate. Jurgen de Poorter is professor of administrative law at Tilburg University and deputy judge in the District Court of The Hague. Ernst Hirsch Ballin is distinguished university professor at Tilburg University, professor in human rights law at the University of Amsterdam, and president of the T.M.C. Asser Institute for International and European Law. He is also a member of the Scientific Council for Government policy (WRR). Saskia Lavrijssen is professor of Economic Regulation and Market Governance of Network Industries at Tilburg University.

Judicial Review of Administration in Europe

Judicial Review of Administration in Europe PDF Author: Giacinto Della Cananea
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0198867603
Category : Judicial review
Languages : en
Pages : 417

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book is about judicial review of public administration. Many have regarded this to divide European legal orders, with judicial review of administrative action in the general courts or specialized administrative courts, or with different distance from the executive. There has been considerably less of comparison of the basic procedural and substantive principles. The comparative study in this book of procedural fairness and propriety in the courts reveals not only differences but also some common and connecting elements, in a 'common core' perspective. The book is divided into four parts. The first explains the nature and purpose of a comparison to understand the relevance and significance of commonality and diversity between the legal systems of Europe, and which considers other legal systems which are distant and distinct from Europe, such as China and Latin America. The second part contains an overview of the systems of judicial review in these legal orders. The third part, which is the heart of the 'common core' method, contains both a set of hypothetical cases and the solutions, according to the experts of the legal systems selected for our comparison, to the cases. The fourth part serves to examine the answers in comparative terms to ascertain not so much whether a 'common core' exists, but how it is shaped and evolves, also in response to the influence of supranational legal orders as the European Union and the Council of Europe.

Legal Culture, Legality and the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in England and Australia

Legal Culture, Legality and the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in England and Australia PDF Author: Voraphol Malsukhum
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 9811612676
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 269

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book presents a navigating framework of legal culture and legality to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the English and Australian determination of the grounds of judicial review. This book facilitates tangible process of how and why jurisdictional error, jurisdictional fact, proportionality and substantive legitimate expectations are debatable in English law, while they are either completely rejected or firmly entrenched in Australian law. This book argues that these differences are not just random. Legality is not just a fig-leaf, but is profoundly rooted in legal systems’ legal culture; hence, it dictates the way in which courts empower, justify, constrain or limit the scope of judicial review. This book presents evidence that courts differ in legal systems and apply diverse ways to determine the scope of judicial review based on their deep understanding of legality, which is embedded in the legal culture of their legal system. This book uses comparative methodology and develops this framework between English and Australian law. Although obvious and important, this book presents a kind of examination that has never been undertaken in this depth and detail before.

Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Judicial Review of Administrative Action PDF Author: Stanley Alexander De Smith
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description