A Guide to Judicial and Political Review of Federal Agencies

A Guide to Judicial and Political Review of Federal Agencies PDF Author: John Fitzgerald Duffy
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590314838
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 340

Get Book Here

Book Description
"This book provides a thorough overview of the law of judicial and political control of federal agencies. The primary focus is on the availability and scope of judicial review, but the book also discusses the control exercised by the U.S. president and Congress"--Provided by publisher.

A Guide to Judicial and Political Review of Federal Agencies

A Guide to Judicial and Political Review of Federal Agencies PDF Author: John Fitzgerald Duffy
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590314838
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 340

Get Book Here

Book Description
"This book provides a thorough overview of the law of judicial and political control of federal agencies. The primary focus is on the availability and scope of judicial review, but the book also discusses the control exercised by the U.S. president and Congress"--Provided by publisher.

The Doctrine of Judicial Review, Its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays

The Doctrine of Judicial Review, Its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays PDF Author: Edward Samuel Corwin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional history
Languages : en
Pages : 204

Get Book Here

Book Description


Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution

Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution PDF Author: Sylvia Snowiss
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 9780300046656
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 252

Get Book Here

Book Description
In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review. She traces the development of judicial review from American independence through the tenure of John Marshall as Chief Justice, showing that Marshall's role was far more innovative and decisive than has yet been recognized. According to the author all support for judicial review before Marshall contemplated a fundamentally different practice from that which we know today. Marshall did not simply reinforce or extend ideas already accepted but, in superficially minor and disguised ways, effected a radical transformation in the nature of the constitution and the judicial relationship to it.

Marbury V. Madison

Marbury V. Madison PDF Author: William Edward Nelson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 168

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book is a study of the power of the American Supreme Court to interpret laws and overrule any found in conflict with the Constitution. It examines the landmark case of Marbury versus Madison (1803), when that power of judicial review was first fully articulated.

Marbury V. Madison and Judicial Review

Marbury V. Madison and Judicial Review PDF Author: Robert Lowry Clinton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 352

Get Book Here

Book Description


Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107114497
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.

Judicial Review

Judicial Review PDF Author: Hugh Southey
Publisher: Jordan Publishing (GB)
ISBN: 9781784730963
Category : Administrative remedies
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
Judicial Review: A Practical Guide is a handbook which aims to be a first port of call in all matters concerning judicial review applications, whether in civil or criminal proceedings. This new edition has been significantly amended to take account of the following developments in law and practice, including: * Development of the Unified Tribunal system with transfers of judicial reviews * Regionalisation of Administrative Court * Clear development of mistake of fact as a mistake of law * Increasing understanding of the impact of the Human Rights Act * Limitations upon judicial review in the context of immigration * Ongoing case-law developments * Changes to Appeals (CPR Pt 52) * Developments in costs and funding In addition to the authors' commentary, Judicial Review: A Practical Guide contains over 20 precedents covering all aspects of the litigation process, together with all the main legislative and judicial materials.

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review PDF Author: W. J. Waluchow
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139462814
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 7

Get Book Here

Book Description
In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.

Democracy and Distrust

Democracy and Distrust PDF Author: John Hart Ely
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 0674263294
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 281

Get Book Here

Book Description
This powerfully argued appraisal of judicial review may change the face of American law. Written for layman and scholar alike, the book addresses one of the most important issues facing Americans today: within what guidelines shall the Supreme Court apply the strictures of the Constitution to the complexities of modern life? Until now legal experts have proposed two basic approaches to the Constitution. The first, “interpretivism,” maintains that we should stick as closely as possible to what is explicit in the document itself. The second, predominant in recent academic theorizing, argues that the courts should be guided by what they see as the fundamental values of American society. John Hart Ely demonstrates that both of these approaches are inherently incomplete and inadequate. Democracy and Distrust sets forth a new and persuasive basis for determining the role of the Supreme Court today. Ely’s proposal is centered on the view that the Court should devote itself to assuring majority governance while protecting minority rights. “The Constitution,” he writes, “has proceeded from the sensible assumption that an effective majority will not unreasonably threaten its own rights, and has sought to assure that such a majority not systematically treat others less well than it treats itself. It has done so by structuring decision processes at all levels in an attempt to ensure, first, that everyone’s interests will be represented when decisions are made, and second, that the application of those decisions will not be manipulated so as to reintroduce in practice the sort of discrimination that is impermissible in theory.” Thus, Ely’s emphasis is on the procedural side of due process, on the preservation of governmental structure rather than on the recognition of elusive social values. At the same time, his approach is free of interpretivism’s rigidity because it is fully responsive to the changing wishes of a popular majority. Consequently, his book will have a profound impact on legal opinion at all levels—from experts in constitutional law, to lawyers with general practices, to concerned citizens watching the bewildering changes in American law.

Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts

Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts PDF Author: Laura Langer
Publisher: State University of New York Press
ISBN: 0791489248
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 189

Get Book Here

Book Description
Despite having the final word on many policy issues, state supreme courts have received much less scholarly attention than the United States Supreme Court. Examining these often neglected institutions, this book demonstrates that by increasing our knowledge of the behavior of state supreme court judges across differing areas of law, we can enrich our understanding of the function of state supreme courts, and the relations between these institutions and other branches of government. In addition, Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts advances our conceptualization of the judiciary and offers a more general theory about judicial behavior, accountability, and the role of courts in American society. Langer looks at the policy-making powers of state supreme courts, and the conditions under which justices are most likely to review and invalidate state laws, portraying judges as forward thinking individuals who pursue both policy and electoral goals.