Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens

Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 216

Get Book Here

Book Description

Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens

Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 216

Get Book Here

Book Description


Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens

Health Care Financing Administration Paperwork Burdens PDF Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781983486807
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 206

Get Book Here

Book Description
Health Care Financing Administration paperwork burdens : hearing before the Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, Washington, DC, May 9, 2001.

HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION PAPERWORK BURDENS... HEARING... SERIAL NO. 107-6... COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS..., 107TH CONGRESS, 1ST S.

HEALTH CARE FINANCING ADMINISTRATION PAPERWORK BURDENS... HEARING... SERIAL NO. 107-6... COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS..., 107TH CONGRESS, 1ST S. PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


House Hearing, 107th Congress

House Hearing, 107th Congress PDF Author: U. S. Government Printing Office (Gpo)
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289590420
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 208

Get Book Here

Book Description
The United States Government Printing Office (GPO) was created in June 1860, and is an agency of the U.S. federal government based in Washington D.C. The office prints documents produced by and for the federal government, including Congress, the Supreme Court, the Executive Office of the President and other executive departments, and independent agencies. A hearing is a meeting of the Senate, House, joint or certain Government committee that is open to the public so that they can listen in on the opinions of the legislation. Hearings can also be held to explore certain topics or a current issue. It typically takes between two months up to two years to be published. This is one of those hearings.

Reducing Regulatory and Paperwork Burdens on Small Healthcare Providers

Reducing Regulatory and Paperwork Burdens on Small Healthcare Providers PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 102

Get Book Here

Book Description


Health Care Financing Administration ... [et al

Health Care Financing Administration ... [et al PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 1498

Get Book Here

Book Description


Health Care Financing Administration Rulings on Medicare, Medicaid, Professional Standards Review, and Related Matters

Health Care Financing Administration Rulings on Medicare, Medicaid, Professional Standards Review, and Related Matters PDF Author: United States. Health Care Financing Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicaid
Languages : en
Pages : 94

Get Book Here

Book Description


Supplement to the Master Agreement Between the Health Care Financing Administration and the American Federation of Government Employees

Supplement to the Master Agreement Between the Health Care Financing Administration and the American Federation of Government Employees PDF Author: United States. Health Care Financing Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Collective bargaining
Languages : en
Pages : 28

Get Book Here

Book Description


Medicare

Medicare PDF Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289039585
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52

Get Book Here

Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the claims process for Medicare physician services to determine whether: (1) opportunities exist to help providers submit more complete claims; (2) notices to beneficiaries explain claims decisions clearly; and (3) electronic services, such as electronic mail, could reduce paperwork. GAO found that: (1) in 1989, providers and beneficiaries filed 45 million incomplete claim forms; (2) incomplete claim forms were more costly to process than complete claim forms; (3) service descriptions and provider names on benefit notices were vague; (4) mathematical calculations and explanations of beneficiary liability were difficult to understand; and (5) reasons for service denial were not sufficiently precise. GAO also found that: (1) the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) could make filing claims easier by using electronic technologies to automate the process; (2) electronic technologies would reduce Medicare administrative costs and alleviate providers' cost and paperwork; and (3) some contractors and commercial insurers had already developed systems to simplify the claims process and make electronic filing available to more providers.

Administrative Burden

Administrative Burden PDF Author: Pamela Herd
Publisher: Russell Sage Foundation
ISBN: 1610448782
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 361

Get Book Here

Book Description
Winner of the 2020 Outstanding Book Award Presented by the Public and Nonprofit Section of the National Academy of Management Winner of the 2019 Louis Brownlow Book Award from the National Academy of Public Administration Bureaucracy, confusing paperwork, and complex regulations—or what public policy scholars Pamela Herd and Donald Moynihan call administrative burdens—often introduce delay and frustration into our experiences with government agencies. Administrative burdens diminish the effectiveness of public programs and can even block individuals from fundamental rights like voting. In AdministrativeBurden, Herd and Moynihan document that the administrative burdens citizens regularly encounter in their interactions with the state are not simply unintended byproducts of governance, but the result of deliberate policy choices. Because burdens affect people’s perceptions of government and often perpetuate long-standing inequalities, understanding why administrative burdens exist and how they can be reduced is essential for maintaining a healthy public sector. Through in-depth case studies of federal programs and controversial legislation, the authors show that administrative burdens are the nuts-and-bolts of policy design. Regarding controversial issues such as voter enfranchisement or abortion rights, lawmakers often use administrative burdens to limit access to rights or services they oppose. For instance, legislators have implemented administrative burdens such as complicated registration requirements and strict voter-identification laws to suppress turnout of African American voters. Similarly, the right to an abortion is legally protected, but many states require women seeking abortions to comply with burdens such as mandatory waiting periods, ultrasounds, and scripted counseling. As Herd and Moynihan demonstrate, administrative burdens often disproportionately affect the disadvantaged who lack the resources to deal with the financial and psychological costs of navigating these obstacles. However, policymakers have sometimes reduced administrative burdens or shifted them away from citizens and onto the government. One example is Social Security, which early administrators of the program implemented in the 1930s with the goal of minimizing burdens for beneficiaries. As a result, the take-up rate is about 100 percent because the Social Security Administration keeps track of peoples’ earnings for them, automatically calculates benefits and eligibility, and simply requires an easy online enrollment or visiting one of 1,200 field offices. Making more programs and public services operate this efficiently, the authors argue, requires adoption of a nonpartisan, evidence-based metric for determining when and how to institute administrative burdens, with a bias toward reducing them. By ensuring that the public’s interaction with government is no more onerous than it need be, policymakers and administrators can reduce inequality, boost civic engagement, and build an efficient state that works for all citizens.