En buena lógica PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download En buena lógica PDF full book. Access full book title En buena lógica by Humberto Marraud González. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Humberto Marraud González
Publisher: Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara
ISBN: 6075479988
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : es
Pages : 160
Get Book Here
Book Description
No hay buenos y malos argumentos, sino argumentos mejores y peores. Hubert Marraud, autor de este libro, nos presenta su enfoque de la argumentación en dos partes principales: la analítica y la crítica. En la primera, entre otras cosas, nos muestra la definición de argumentar, la importancia de los conectores y operadores argumentativos y la adopción de un modelo descriptivo. En la segunda, describe de manera sistemática los estándares implícitos en nuestras prácticas argumentativas. Esta publicación busca ser un paso más en la consolidación de una comunidad hispanohablante de teóricos de la argumentación.
Author: Humberto Marraud González
Publisher: Editorial Universidad de Guadalajara
ISBN: 6075479988
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : es
Pages : 160
Get Book Here
Book Description
No hay buenos y malos argumentos, sino argumentos mejores y peores. Hubert Marraud, autor de este libro, nos presenta su enfoque de la argumentación en dos partes principales: la analítica y la crítica. En la primera, entre otras cosas, nos muestra la definición de argumentar, la importancia de los conectores y operadores argumentativos y la adopción de un modelo descriptivo. En la segunda, describe de manera sistemática los estándares implícitos en nuestras prácticas argumentativas. Esta publicación busca ser un paso más en la consolidación de una comunidad hispanohablante de teóricos de la argumentación.
Author: Fernando Leal
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 3030853683
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 473
Get Book Here
Book Description
This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.
Author: Luis Vega-Reñón
Publisher: Palestra Editores
ISBN: 6124218909
Category : Law
Languages : es
Pages : 259
Get Book Here
Book Description
"Argumentar es casi tan natural como conversar. En realidad, toda argumentación es una forma de conversación. Argumentamos cuando damos razones a favor o en contra de una propuesta, para sentar una opinión o rebatir la contraria, para defender una solución o para suscitar un problema. Argumentamos cuando aducimos normas, valores o motivos para orientar en cierta dirección el sentir de un auditorio o el ánimo de un jurado, para fundar un veredicto, para justificar una decisión o para descartar una opción. Argumentamos cuando procuramos, en cualquier suerte de escrito, convencer al lector de ciertas ideas, posturas, actitudes, o prevenirlo frente a otras". Este libro trata sobre esta actividad fundamental que desarrollamos en nuestra vida diaria. El autor nos introduce al estudio de la teoría de la argumentación a partir de ejemplos de la vida cotidiana, permitiendo de este modo, sin perder rigor académico, persuadirnos y animarnos a su lectura desde sus primeras páginas. De la Presentación del autor
Author: Roberto Martins
Publisher: Lulu.com
ISBN: 1435715306
Category : Science
Languages : pt
Pages : 474
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book contains a selection of papers presented at the V South Cone Meeting of Philosophy and History of Science (Florianópolis, Brazil, May 2006). The language of the chapters is Portuguese, Spanish or English. Published by the South Cone Association for Philosophy and History of Science, www.afhic.org.
Author: Lilian Bermejo Luque
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 940071761X
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : en
Pages : 220
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized. The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman’s New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reasoning and arguing.
Author: Steven Shaviro
Publisher: MIT Press
ISBN: 0262517973
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 191
Get Book Here
Book Description
A Deleuzian reading of Whitehead and a Whiteheadian reading of Deleuze open the possibility of a critical aesthetics of contemporary culture. In Without Criteria, Steven Shaviro proposes and explores a philosophical fantasy: imagine a world in which Alfred North Whitehead takes the place of Martin Heidegger. What if Whitehead, instead of Heidegger, had set the agenda for postmodern thought? Heidegger asks, “Why is there something, rather than nothing?” Whitehead asks, “How is it that there is always something new?” In a world where everything from popular music to DNA is being sampled and recombined, argues Shaviro, Whitehead's question is the truly urgent one. Without Criteria is Shaviro's experiment in rethinking postmodern theory, especially the theory of aesthetics, from a point of view that hearkens back to Whitehead rather than Heidegger. In working through the ideas of Whitehead and Deleuze, Shaviro also appeals to Kant, arguing that certain aspects of Kant's thought pave the way for the philosophical “constructivism” embraced by both Whitehead and Deleuze. Kant, Whitehead, and Deleuze are not commonly grouped together, but the juxtaposition of them in Without Criteria helps to shed light on a variety of issues that are of concern to contemporary art and media practices.
Author: Pedro Posada Gómez
Publisher: Universidad del Valle
ISBN: 6287683783
Category : Language Arts & Disciplines
Languages : es
Pages : 246
Get Book Here
Book Description
La teoría de la argumentación ha sido definida como la disciplina que estudia las técnicas que permiten a un orador convencer o persuadir a un auditorio de la validez de las tesis que le presenta, creando o reforzando su adhesión a ellas. La teoría de la argumentación surge a mediados del siglo pasado con Perelman y Toulmin como alternativa crítica al modelo lógico-matemático propugnado por la filosofía analítica del Círculo de Viena. Actualmente varias teorías confluyen en la pretensión de combinar los elementos de las tres disciplinas aristotélicas: lógica, dialéctica y retórica (van Eerneren, Habermas). El presente texto aspira a ser una introducción didáctica a las teorías de la argumentación de estos cuatro autores y a los problemas y soluciones que ellas plantean. El autor espera que este texto se constituya en una herramienta útil para todas aquellas personas que buscan mejorar su competencia para argumentar de forma convincente, persuasiva y eficaz, bajo el entendimiento de que el lenguaje, el discurso y el diálogo son los instrumentos para la búsqueda del acuerdo entre las personas, y de que el ejercicio libre, democrático y responsable de la palabra es un derecho y un deber del ciudadano actual.El autor espera que este texto se constituya en una herramienta útil para todas aquellas personas que buscan mejorar su competencia para argumentar de forma convincente, persuasiva y eficaz, bajo el entendimiento de que el lenguaje, el discurso y el diálogo son los instrumentos para la búsqueda del acuerdo entre las personas, y de que el ejercicio libre, democrático y responsable de la palabra es un derecho y un deber del ciudadano actual.
Author: Katrine Marcal
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
ISBN: 1681771853
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 158
Get Book Here
Book Description
How do you get your dinner? That is the basic question of economics. When economist and philosopher Adam Smith proclaimed that all our actions were motivated by self-interest, he used the example of the baker and the butcher as he laid the foundations for 'economic man,' arguing that the baker and butcher didn't give bread and meat out of the goodness of their hearts. It's an ironic point of view coming from a bachelor who lived with his mother for most of his life—a woman who cooked his dinner every night.The economic man has dominated our understanding of modern-day capitalism, with a focus on self-interest and the exclusion of all other motivations. Such a view point disregards the unpaid work of mothering, caring, cleaning and cooking. It insists that if women are paid less, then that's because their labor is worth less.A kind of femininst Freakonomics, Who Cooked Adam Smith’s Dinner? charts the myth of economic man—from its origins at Adam Smith's dinner table, its adaptation by the Chicago School, and its disastrous role in the 2008 Global Financial Crisis—in a witty and courageous dismantling of one of the biggest myths of our time.
Author: Unión matemática argentina, Buenos Aires
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Philosophy
Languages : es
Pages : 454
Get Book Here
Book Description
