Effects of Monensin Supplementation and Wheat Pasture Maturity on Forage Intake and Digestion Characteristics of Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Effects of Monensin Supplementation and Wheat Pasture Maturity on Forage Intake and Digestion Characteristics of Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Ulises A. Sanchez-Sandoval
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description
Eight Angus cross-bred cows (669 ± 23.2 kg of BW) fitted with duodenal and ruminal cannulas grazing winter wheat pasture (WWP) were used in a split-plot design to evaluate the effects of monensin supplementation and WWP stage of maturity on forage intake, digestive function, metabolizable protein, and ruminal fermentation. Supplemental treatment was the main plot, and stage of maturity was the subplot. Two levels of monensin supplementation: 1) Control (CON; 1.0 kgcow−1d−1 of wheat middling only), and 2) monensin (MON; CON plus 200 mg of monensin); and two stages of WWP maturity: 2) mid-March (MAR; March 13 to March 26; vegetative stage), and 2) early April) (APR; March 27 to April 8; heading stage) of 2017 were compared in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Cows grazed in a single wheat pasture with supplements deposited directly into their rumens through their rumen cannula at 0700 daily. Monensin supplementation did not affect forage intake (P = 0.64), nutrient flow to duodenum (P ≥ 0.47) or total tract digestion expressed as kg/d (P > 0.45). Although, OM and CP flowing to the duodenum were not affected by monensin supplementation (P ≥ 0.53), microbial OM and microbial CP decreased (P = 0.03) with monensin supplementation. As stage of maturity of WWP advanced, forage intake (P = 0.02), ruminal digestibility of DM and OM (P ≤ 0.05) and total tract digestion expressed as kg/d (P = 0.01) decreased. Also, total duodenal CP (P = 0.01), microbial protein (P = 0.01), and feed protein (bypass protein; P = 0.03) flow decreased with advancing WWP stage of maturity. Monensin supplementation increased (P = 0.01) propionate (18.38, and 20.79 ± 0.55 mol/100 mol), and decreased (P = 0.01) the acetate: propionate ratio (3.26, and 2.73 ± 0.13). Ruminal pH (6.03 and 6.31 ± 0.08), acetate (54.6 and 58.3 ± 0.98 mol/100 mol), and acetate propionate ratio (2.52, and 3.48 ± 0.13) increased (P ≤ 0.04), and propionate (21.9, and 17.3 ± 0.56 mol/100 mol) decreased (P ≤ 0.05) with advancing WWP stage of maturity. Results suggest that monensin increases propionate without affecting forage intake, digestibility or metabolizable protein of cattle grazing WWP. Key words: metabolizable protein, microbial synthesis, monensin, winter wheat pasture

Effects of Monensin Supplementation and Wheat Pasture Maturity on Forage Intake and Digestion Characteristics of Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Effects of Monensin Supplementation and Wheat Pasture Maturity on Forage Intake and Digestion Characteristics of Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Ulises A. Sanchez-Sandoval
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description
Eight Angus cross-bred cows (669 ± 23.2 kg of BW) fitted with duodenal and ruminal cannulas grazing winter wheat pasture (WWP) were used in a split-plot design to evaluate the effects of monensin supplementation and WWP stage of maturity on forage intake, digestive function, metabolizable protein, and ruminal fermentation. Supplemental treatment was the main plot, and stage of maturity was the subplot. Two levels of monensin supplementation: 1) Control (CON; 1.0 kgcow−1d−1 of wheat middling only), and 2) monensin (MON; CON plus 200 mg of monensin); and two stages of WWP maturity: 2) mid-March (MAR; March 13 to March 26; vegetative stage), and 2) early April) (APR; March 27 to April 8; heading stage) of 2017 were compared in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Cows grazed in a single wheat pasture with supplements deposited directly into their rumens through their rumen cannula at 0700 daily. Monensin supplementation did not affect forage intake (P = 0.64), nutrient flow to duodenum (P ≥ 0.47) or total tract digestion expressed as kg/d (P > 0.45). Although, OM and CP flowing to the duodenum were not affected by monensin supplementation (P ≥ 0.53), microbial OM and microbial CP decreased (P = 0.03) with monensin supplementation. As stage of maturity of WWP advanced, forage intake (P = 0.02), ruminal digestibility of DM and OM (P ≤ 0.05) and total tract digestion expressed as kg/d (P = 0.01) decreased. Also, total duodenal CP (P = 0.01), microbial protein (P = 0.01), and feed protein (bypass protein; P = 0.03) flow decreased with advancing WWP stage of maturity. Monensin supplementation increased (P = 0.01) propionate (18.38, and 20.79 ± 0.55 mol/100 mol), and decreased (P = 0.01) the acetate: propionate ratio (3.26, and 2.73 ± 0.13). Ruminal pH (6.03 and 6.31 ± 0.08), acetate (54.6 and 58.3 ± 0.98 mol/100 mol), and acetate propionate ratio (2.52, and 3.48 ± 0.13) increased (P ≤ 0.04), and propionate (21.9, and 17.3 ± 0.56 mol/100 mol) decreased (P ≤ 0.05) with advancing WWP stage of maturity. Results suggest that monensin increases propionate without affecting forage intake, digestibility or metabolizable protein of cattle grazing WWP. Key words: metabolizable protein, microbial synthesis, monensin, winter wheat pasture

The Effects of Monensin and Monensin-containing Supplements on Performance of Steers Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

The Effects of Monensin and Monensin-containing Supplements on Performance of Steers Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Brian George Fieser
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Effects of Grain and Monensin on Ruminal Fermentation, Forage Intake, and Digestibility, Digesta Kinetics and Performance in Beef Steers Grazing Native Range Or Winter Wheat Pasture

Effects of Grain and Monensin on Ruminal Fermentation, Forage Intake, and Digestibility, Digesta Kinetics and Performance in Beef Steers Grazing Native Range Or Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Mark Everett Branine
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beef cattle
Languages : en
Pages : 362

Get Book Here

Book Description


Effects of Fishmeal Supplementation on Metabolizable Protein of Beef Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasutre

Effects of Fishmeal Supplementation on Metabolizable Protein of Beef Cows Grazing Winter Wheat Pasutre PDF Author: Jorge A. Rodela
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 90

Get Book Here

Book Description
Eight ruminally and duodenally cannulated, angus-crossbred cows (665 ± 20.6 kg) grazing winter wheat pasture (WWP) were used in a complete randomized design to evaluate the effects of fish meal (FM) supplementation on forage intake, characteristics of digestion and metabolizable protein of cattle grazing WWP. The experiment was conducted from March 7 through March 19, 2016. Treatments consisted of cows grazing in a single pasture and supplemented with FM to provide: control, no RUP supplement (CON), or FM supplemented at a level calculated to supply 10% of the forage CP intake as RUP (FM). Supplemental FM was placed directly into the rumen cannula once daily at 0700 h. Forage DM, NDF, CP, total OM intake, OM intake expressed as g/kg of BW were not affected (P ≥ 0.44) by FM supplementation. Also, supplemental FM had no effects on microbial protein efficiency (P = 0.34), microbial protein synthesis (P = 0.70), feed protein bypassing rumen fermentation (P = 0.72), or total CP flowing to duodenum (P = 0.07). Moreover, true ruminal, or total tract digestibility of OM, NDF, and CP were not affected (P ≥ 0.38) by FM supplementation. Ruminal pH (6.37, and 6.43 ± 0.09 for CON and FM, respectively), total VFA production (50.2, and 49.7 ± 0.1.74 mM for CON and FM, respectively), acetate (74.4, and 74.6 ± 0.77 mol/100 mol for CON and FM, respectively), propionate (16.7, and 16.1 ± 0.62 mol/100 mol for CON and FM, respectively) and acetate/propionate ratio (4.49 and 4.69 ± 0.22 for CON and FM, respectively) were not affected by FM supplementation (P ≥ 0.49). Although FM supplementation did not decrease forage intake, it failed to improve MP of cows grazing WWP. The results indicate that improvements in performance of cattle grazing WWP should not be expected with supplementing FM at the level supplemented in this experiment

Effects of a Monensin Ruminal Delivery Device on Forage Intake and Ruminal Fermentation in Steers Grazing Irrigated Winter Wheat Pasture

Effects of a Monensin Ruminal Delivery Device on Forage Intake and Ruminal Fermentation in Steers Grazing Irrigated Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Ronald Winfield Davenport
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beef cattle
Languages : en
Pages : 104

Get Book Here

Book Description


Effect of Wheat Middling Supplementation on Metabolizable Protein of Heifers Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

Effect of Wheat Middling Supplementation on Metabolizable Protein of Heifers Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture PDF Author: Fathi M. Amraga
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cattle
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description
Eight ruminally and duodenally cannulated, Angus-crossbred heifers (272 ± 19.2 kg) grazing winter wheat pasture (WWP) were used in a completely randomized design to evaluate effects of wheat middling (WM; offered at 0.4% of BW; as-fed basis) supplementation on metabolizable protein. The experiment was conducted from April 5 through April 19, 2013. Heifers grazed in a single WWP with supplements offered individually, once daily at 0700 h. Forage DM, total OM, NDF intake, and OM intake expressed as g/kg of BW were not affected (P [greater than or equal to] 0.11) by WM supplementation, and total CP intake (P = 0.03) increased with WM supplementation. Supplementation of WM increased the flow of OM, and CP (P [less than or equal to] 0.04) to the small intestine, but not the flow of NDF (P = 0.40). Feed protein flowing to the small intestine was not affected (P = 0.26) and microbial protein tended to increase (P = 0.10) with WM supplementation. Total tract OM, CP, and NDF digestibility were not affected (P [greater than or equal to] 0.13) by WM supplementation. Ruminal pH decreased and total VFA production increased (P = 0.01) with WM supplementation. Ruminal ammonia (P = 0.65), molar proportion of VFA (P [greater than or equal to] 0.11), and acetate to propionate ratio were not affected (P - 0.25) by WM supplementation. Supplementation of WM to cattle grazing WWP improves metabolizable protein by increasing microbial protein synthesis.

Effect of Fat Supplementation of Steers Grazing Wheat Pasture on Forage Intake and Digestion, Grazing, and Feedlot Performance

Effect of Fat Supplementation of Steers Grazing Wheat Pasture on Forage Intake and Digestion, Grazing, and Feedlot Performance PDF Author: Darick A. Chabot
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beef cattle
Languages : en
Pages : 146

Get Book Here

Book Description


Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization

Forage Quality, Evaluation, and Utilization PDF Author: George C. Fahey
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 1032

Get Book Here

Book Description
Provides a historical foundation as well as a review of the state-of- the-art in forage science, detailing 25 years of progress in forage quality, evaluation, and utilization, along with the latest developments and new directions for future research. The volume is divided into six sections: overview of forage science; identification and quantitative measurement of forage quality components; intake as a critical element of forest quality; role of digestion and metabolism in determining forage quality; integrating concepts affecting changes in forage quality; and improving forage quality and evaluation. No index. Member price, $36. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR

Bibliography of Agriculture

Bibliography of Agriculture PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agriculture
Languages : en
Pages : 1732

Get Book Here

Book Description


Cumulated Index Medicus

Cumulated Index Medicus PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 1364

Get Book Here

Book Description