Book [PDF] Effectiveness Of Mitigation Spending Download

Effectiveness of Mitigation Spending

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Emergency Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description

Effectiveness Of Mitigation Spending, (106-34), August 4, 1999

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description

Cost Effectiveness of Hazard Mitigation Spending

Get Book Here

Book Description

Effectiveness of Mitigation Spending

Get Book Here

Book Description
"Now, coupled with increasing the authorization for mitigation funding, is the subcommittee's obligation to make sure that mitigation funding goes to the most effective projects available. We need to make sure that we are getting the most bang for each mitigation buck. The [Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 1999] requires that mitigation spending be cost effective. This requirement has historically and rightfully been interpreted to mean that grant proposals must undergo a cost-benefit analysis. This analysis not only helps the government screen out potentially bad projects, but it also allows decision makers to compare possible projects so that even among a group of good projects authorities can pick the very best ones to fund"--Page 1.

COST EFFECTIVENESS OF HAZARD MITIGATION SPENDING... HEARING... 106-103... COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE, HOUSE OF REPRESENTA.

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description

Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazard Mitigation

Author: Federal Emergency Management Agency
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
ISBN: 9781482512090
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 60

Get Book Here

Book Description
Over the last decade, the overall cost of disasters to the United States has grown significantly. From 1989 to 1993, the average annual losses from disasters were $3.3 billion. Over the last 4 years, the average annual losses have increased to $13 billion. On the Federal side alone, disasters have cost over $20 billion over the last four years. The disaster losses are equally as staggering for the American public. Since 1993, over 1.4 million Americans have been impacted by Presidentially declared disasters, resulting in the loss of their homes, property, communities, jobs, and in some cases their lives. This figure does not include the hundreds of thousands of people impacted by natural hazard events that were managed entirely at the State and local levels, and involved the personal savings and private resources of property owners. Indeed, the impacts of major disasters on Americans go well beyond those damages that are directly sustained. Recovery from disasters requires resources to be diverted from other important public and private programs, and adversely impacts the productivity of economic systems. To many, the rising costs associated with natural disasters have become unacceptable. To address this growing problem, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), under Director James L. Witt, has encouraged the emergency management community to become more proactive in reducing the potential for losses before an event occurs. This proactive strategy is commonly known as mitigation. Hazard mitigation is defined as sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to people and property from hazards and their effects. This distinguishes mitigation from other major emergency management functions such as preparedness and training, response, and short-term recovery. This emphasis on mitigation led FEMA to introduce a National Mitigation Strategy in December of 1995 to encourage a national focus on hazard mitigation. The strategy is based on the objective of strengthening the partnership among all levels of government and the private sector and to empower all Americans to fulfill their responsibilities for ensuring safer communities. The strategy was developed with input from State and local officials, as well as individuals and organizations with expertise in hazard mitigation. The strategy has two goals: to substantially increase the public awareness of natural hazard risk so that the public demands safer communities in which to live and work; and to significantly reduce the risk of loss of life, injury, economic costs, and destruction of natural and cultural resources that result from natural hazards. The reason for the emphasis on mitigation is clear. Experience at the Federal, State, and local levels during natural disasters, and a growing body of associated research, have demonstrated that the losses from such events (in terms of life, property, and community resources) can be substantially reduced when mitigation techniques and technologies are applied. This paper was prepared to illustrate the comparative benefits and costs associated with the implementation of a variety of mitigation measures by Federal, State, and local government, and private sector entities. To accomplish this, this paper will identify, through a series of case studies, the mitigation tools used to achieve cost-effective hazard mitigation benefits. The case studies are representative of the types of mitigation measures that are, or could be, performed elsewhere in the nation under similar conditions.

Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazard Mitigation

Author: P. Michael Laub
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 9780788148637
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 70

Get Book Here

Book Description
Experience at the Federal, State, and local levels during natural disasters, along with a growing body of research, has demonstrated that the losses from such events, in terms of life, property, and community resources, can be substantially reduced when mitigation techniques and technologies are applied. This report illustrates the comparative benefits and costs associated with the implementation of a variety of mitigation measures by governments and private sector entities. It identifies, through a series of case studies, the mitigation tools used to achieve cost-effective hazard mitigation benefits.

106-1 Hearing: Effectiveness Of Mitigation Spending, (106-34), August 4, 1999

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description

Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazard Mitigation

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Buildings
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description
Reviews the types of benefits that can accrue to different segments of society from natural hazard mitigative measures, the types of costs that can be incurred by undertaking the actions, and the types of analyses needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness associated with the mitigation measure.

Mitigation of Food Wastage

Author:
Publisher: Food & Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
ISBN: 9789251085103
Category : Food conservation
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
"Food Waste Footprint"--Page preceding title page.