Effect of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Recycling in Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forage

Effect of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Recycling in Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forage PDF Author: Tryon Atley Wickersham
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 318

Get Book Here

Book Description

Effect of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Recycling in Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forage

Effect of Supplemental Protein on Nitrogen Recycling in Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forage PDF Author: Tryon Atley Wickersham
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 318

Get Book Here

Book Description


Effects of Protein Supplementation and Forage Quality on Intake and Digestion in Cattle

Effects of Protein Supplementation and Forage Quality on Intake and Digestion in Cattle PDF Author: Jamie Kunkel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
In many pasture and rangeland scenarios, low-quality forages (6-8% CP) are the primary energy source for some portion of the year. At these times, energy is typically the first limiting nutrient to the ruminant. Low-quality forages are generally not limited in availability; however, the high cell wall content and reduced levels of CP prevent ruminants from being able to extract the harvested energy. Without provision of supplemental nutrients, the available energy may be inadequate to meet performance expectations. Protein supplementation during periods of inadequate forage quality has been observed to alleviate ruminal nitrogen deficiencies and increase forage utilization. Increased forage utilization translates into greater energy extraction allowing for increased animal performance. The first trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of utilizing non-protein nitrogen (a slow-release urea compared to urea) on intake and digestion of beef steers consuming low-quality bermudagrass hay. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a low-quality bermudagrass hay (7.3 % CP and were ruminally dosed once daily with either urea or slow-release urea (SRU) at levels to provide 0, 64, 128, or 192 mg of N/kg of initial BW per day. Additionally, steers were supplemented with glycerol at levels of 0 or 0.1% of initial BW per day. Total OMI and forage OMI (FOMI) increased quadratically (P

Effects of Supplemental Energy and Protein on Forage Digestion and Urea Kinetics in Beef Cattle

Effects of Supplemental Energy and Protein on Forage Digestion and Urea Kinetics in Beef Cattle PDF Author: Eric Arthur Bailey
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Two experiments quantified effects of supplemental protein and energy on forage digestion and urea kinetics in beef cattle. In experiment 1, energy treatments included: control, 600 g glucose dosed ruminally once daily, and 480 g VFA infused ruminally over 8 h daily. Casein was dosed ruminally once daily (120 or 240 g). Cattle (208 kg) had ad libitum access to low-quality hay (5.8% protein). Infusion of VFA decreased forage intake by 27%. Glucose decreased NDF digestibility. Microbial N flow was greater for 240 than for 120 g/d casein, but was not affected by energy. Retained N increased with casein supply. Urea-N entry rate (UER) and gut entry of urea-N (GER) were not affected by energy, casein, or interactions, but GER/UER was less when 240 rather than 120 g/d casein was provided. Compared to VFA, glucose tended to increase GER/UER. Glucose led to more microbial uptake of recycled urea than VFA. In these young calves, changes in N and energy supply did not greatly impact urea kinetics, likely because increased N was largely retained. In experiment 2, treatments included: 0 or 1.2 kg glucose, and 240 or 480 g casein. Cattle (391 kg) were fed low-quality hay (4.7% protein). Glucose reduced forage intake by 18%, whereas casein did not affect it, and depressed fiber digestion. Microbial N flow to the duodenum and retained N increased as casein increased, but neither was affected by glucose. Increasing casein increased UER 50%. Urinary urea-N increased as casein increased; moreover, GER numerically increased 25% as casein increased. GER/UER decreased as casein increased. Glucose decreased urinary urea, but did not change UER or GER. Microbial uptake of recycled urea was least for steers receiving 480 g/d casein with no glucose, reflecting that this treatment exceeded ruminal requirement for N. In these more mature steers, increases in N intake increased UER, reflecting that only small proportions of the increased N intake were retained. Thus, as steer maturity increased, UER and GER increased, likely because less N was retained. These studies demonstrate the influence of urea recycling in meeting N needs of cattle fed low-quality forage.

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle

Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle PDF Author: Subcommittee on Beef Cattle Nutrition
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309069343
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 249

Get Book Here

Book Description
As members of the public becomes more concious of the food they consume and its content, higher standards are expected in the preparation of such food. The updated seventh edition of Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle explores the impact of cattle's biological, production, and environmental diversities, as well as variations on nutrient utilization and requirements. More enhanced than previous editions, this edition expands on the descriptions of cattle and their nutritional requirements taking management and environmental conditions into consideration. The book clearly communicates the current state of beef cattle nutrient requirements and animal variation by visually presenting related data via computer-generated models. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle expounds on the effects of beef cattle body condition on the state of compensatory growth, takes an in-depth look at the variations in cattle type, and documents the important effects of the environment and stress on food intake. This volume also uses new data on the development of a fetus during pregnancy to prescribe nutrient requirements of gestating cattle more precisely. By focusing on factors such as product quality and environmental awareness, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle presents standards and advisements for acceptable nutrients in a complete and conventional manner that promotes a more practical understanding and application.

The Effects of Protein Supplementation on Performance of Beef Cattle Grazing Native Mixedgrass Range in Western Kansas

The Effects of Protein Supplementation on Performance of Beef Cattle Grazing Native Mixedgrass Range in Western Kansas PDF Author: Carson McMullen
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Cattle consuming low-protein forage (7% CP) require additional supplemental protein to maintain BW and BCS. Daily delivery of protein supplements places undue financial burden on cattle producers. Supplementing cows as infrequently as once every 6 d) has resulted in similar changes cow BW and BCS when compared to daily supplementation. As calving season nears, producers may wish to increase supplementation frequency. The responses to a change in supplementation frequency during the third trimester of gestation have not been widely investigated. Therefore, our objective in Study 1 was to evaluate the effect of altering supplementation frequency during late gestation on performance of spring-calving cows grazing low-quality, dormant native range and supplemented with dried distillers grains with solubles (DDG). Angus x cows (n = 238; mean age = 6 ± 2.5 yr; average initial BW = 618 ± 56.2 kg; average initial BCS = 5.7 ± 0.03) were stratified by age, BW, BCS, and assigned randomly to 1 of 4 treatments: 1) DDG daily (D1); 2) DDG once every 6 d (D6); 3) DDG daily from d 1 to d 60 and then every 6 d (D1-D6); 4) DDG every 6 d from d 1 to d 60 and then daily (D6-D1). Treatments were initiated 100 d prior to expected onset of calving. Cow BW and BCS were measured every 28 d. Cows were sorted daily before supplementation at 0830 h. Supplement delivery was calculated to meet dietary CP requirements. Increasing supplementation frequency 28 d prepartum negatively affected final BW and BW change from d 61-88 for the D6-D1 supplementation group (P 0.05) compared to other supplementation groups. Cow BW change for the study (d 1-88) was also less (P

Effect of Protein Supplement Sources on Intake and Digestion of Steers Fed Low-quality Forage

Effect of Protein Supplement Sources on Intake and Digestion of Steers Fed Low-quality Forage PDF Author: Courtney Chanel Stefan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Potential protein supplements to grazing cattle were evaluated in two projects. In the first project, Karanja seedcake samples were prepared and ruminally incubated using the in situ method to measure nutrient disappearance in cattle consuming low-quality forage. Organic matter and CP were fractionated by degradability into A, B, and C fractions. Organic matter fraction A degradability ranged from 59.6 to 89% (P

Effects of Various Frequencies of Supplementation and Urea Inclusion in Protein Supplements on Low-quality Forage Use, Ruminal Metabolism, and Performance of Beef Cattle

Effects of Various Frequencies of Supplementation and Urea Inclusion in Protein Supplements on Low-quality Forage Use, Ruminal Metabolism, and Performance of Beef Cattle PDF Author: Chance Garrett Farmer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 410

Get Book Here

Book Description


Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition

Energy and Protein Metabolism and Nutrition PDF Author: Mario Luiz Chizzotti
Publisher: Brill Wageningen Academic
ISBN: 9789086863402
Category : Animal nutrition
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
Variations in feeding frequency may lead to difference in utilization of dietary nutrients. The effects of feeding frequency have been tested in growing pigs and finishing pigs using respiratory quotient and postprandial kinetics of plasma metabolites. A reduced feeding frequency resulted in an increased lipogenesis and proteolysis shortly after the meal both in growing and finishing pigs. Nevertheless, growing and finishing pigs exhibit different metabolic pathways when feeding frequency is reduced.

Degradable Intake Protein Supplementation to Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forages

Degradable Intake Protein Supplementation to Beef Cattle Consuming Low-quality Forages PDF Author: Clay Patrick Mathis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 372

Get Book Here

Book Description


Nitrogen and Energy Nutrition of Ruminants

Nitrogen and Energy Nutrition of Ruminants PDF Author:
Publisher: Academic Press
ISBN: 0080925790
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 373

Get Book Here

Book Description
This comprehensive volume examines the interrelationships of nitrogen and energy nutrition of ruminants. It provides exhaustive coverage of basic concepts, applications, and new research developments.Rumen microbial activity is emphasized. The author, an expert in animal nutrition, discusses new systems of determining dietary energy requirements, the effect of processing feedstuffs, and stress factors. He reviews the availability of nutrients in grains, distillers' grain residues, oilseed meals, molasses, silages, pastures, crop residues, and aquatic plants. Growth stimulants, nutritional management of ruminants in feedlots and pastures, and the value of feed additives are also among the topics considered.The scope of coverage provided by this volume will make it the leading reference for teachers, researchers, consultants, livestock producers, feed manufacturers, and all others who are involved in ruminant feeding and nutrition.From the Preface: This volume covers research on various nitrogen and energy feedstuffs and defines terminology commonly utilized in nitrogen and energy nutrition. The utilization of nitrogen and energy in oilseed meals, fish meals, cereal grains, distillers' residues, molasses, silages, grasses, hays, crop residues, animal waste, and nonprotein nitrogen sources is discussed. Details are given on development and utilization of net energy systems, systems for balancing total nitrogen, and nonprotein nitrogen with total digestible nutrients (TDN) or energy components of ruminant diets. Discussions are presented on metabolism, feedlot, milking, and grazing trials. Growth stimulants, processing of feedstuffs, type of animal, and environmental and management factors that affect feed intake, growth, feed efficiency, and quality of product are reviewed.Emphasis is given to the contributions of ruminal microbes in upgrading forage and nonprotein nitrogen sources to higher-quality bacterial protein, as well as their ability to downgrade high-quality protein and waste nitrogen when protein is fed in excess of microbial needs. Research is presented on means to increase bypassing of the rumen to prevent nitrogen wastage when ruminants are fed concentrate diets. Contributions of ruminal microbes in utilizing cellulosic materials as lignocellulose and hemicellulose as well as starch and other carbohydrates are discussed.