Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-071

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-071 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Grain Inspection Department may require additional security of a grain warehouse operator who is currently petitioning for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Code. Cited herein: 11 U.S.C. section 301; section 302; section 303; section 362; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 34-228(b)(1); 34-229(e); 34-2,100.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-071

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-071 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Grain Inspection Department may require additional security of a grain warehouse operator who is currently petitioning for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Code. Cited herein: 11 U.S.C. section 301; section 302; section 303; section 362; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 34-228(b)(1); 34-229(e); 34-2,100.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1977-071

Attorney General Opinion No. 1977-071 PDF Author: Curt Thomas Schneider
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
A rule proposed for adoption by the Joint Committee on Special Claims restricting compensation which a claimant may pay to an attorney retained to represent the claimant before the committee is unnecessary, for such contingent fee agreement is already prohibited by K.S.A. 1976 Supp. 46-267.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-071

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-071 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 12-1789 authorizes the filing of a petition in opposition to the continuation of a business improvement district. The sufficiency of such a petition is to be determined in accordance with the provisions of K.S.A. 25-3601 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-1781; 12-1789; 25-3601; 25-3602.

Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Model Rules of Professional Conduct PDF Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1981-071

Attorney General Opinion No. 1981-071 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
A county election officer has no authority to determine the sufficiency of the question stated in the petition for elections but such officer may find a petition insufficient for failure to include an individual date line for each petitioner signing. Cited herein: K.S.A. 25-3601, K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 25-3602, Kan. Const., Art. 12, section 5.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-059

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-059 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Kansas laws pertaining to driving under the influence of alcohol allow conviction when the accused's blood or breath alcohol test (BAT) registers less than .10 as long as other supporting evidence is available. A conviction under a similar statute in another state may be considered for sentencing purposes. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1005; 8-1567.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-162

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-162 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 75-4319(b)(2) authorizes public bodies subject to the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) to recess into an executive session for the purpose of "consultation with an attorney for the body or agency which would be deemed privileged in the attorney-client relationship ..." The term "consultation" as used in the KOMA necessarily implies the presence of an attorney. Even though a letter from an attorney to his client containing advice is a privileged communication, we must conclude that members of a public body cannot recess into an executive session to review and discuss among themselves a letter from their attorney. Therefore, it is our opinion that the "consultation with an attorney" exception to the open meetings law cannot be invoked unless the attorney for the body is present. Cited herein: K.S.A. 60-426; 75-4317; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4318(a); K.S.A. 75-4319.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-130

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-130 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-4602, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 123, provides that the court retains jurisdiction over a person assigned to community corrections. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 21-4602, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 123, section 5.

Attorney General Opinion

Attorney General Opinion PDF Author: Carla J. Stovall
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Once the county attorney has opined that the form of the question set forth in a petition submitted pursuant to K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq. and 71-501 complies with statutory requirements, a rebuttable presumption regarding validity of the form of the question attaches. The presumption remains until a party challenging the validity of the form of the question presents before a court of law sufficient evidence to the contrary. The provision in K.S.A. 25-3602 (Furse) that required a circulator of a petition submitted pursuant to K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq. and 71-501 be a registered elector violated the free speech rights of the circulator and, therefore, was unenforceable in relation to a petition filed prior to July 1, 2001. The fact the circulator's recital attached to the petition filed by a circulator pursuant to K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq. and 71-501 did not include the phrase "and a registered elector" does not affect the validity of the petition. Cited herein: K.S.A. 25-205, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 211, section 4; 25-302a, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 128, section 2; 25-303, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 128, section 3; 25-3601; 25-3602, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 211, section 8; 25-4306, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 128, section 8; 25-4320, as amended by L. 2001, Ch. 128, section 10; 71-501; L. 2001, Ch. 128, section 14; L. 2001, Ch. 211, section 19; 25-3602 (Furse); L. 1986, Ch. 141, section 1.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-138

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-138 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Under its police power, a state may reimburse itself for the cost of regulating and supervising a business by assessing the necessary expenses to the business which created the necessity for such regulation and supervision. Use of conservation fee fund monies for the prevention and cleanup of pollution from oil and gas activities regulated by the state corporation commission is sufficiently related to the regulatory function to make its use for such purposes a valid exercise of the police power. The conservation fee fund may be used to fund the study and cleanup of oil and gas pollution pursuant to section 37 of 1986 House Bill No. 3078 (K.S.A. 55-143, as amended by 1986, ch. 201, section 37), to the extent that such study and cleanup are reasonably related to those activities of the oil and gas industry which are regulated by the commission. Use of the conservation fee fund by the state corporation commission for those oil and gas activities it does not regulate (as authorized by K.S.A. 55-143, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 201, section 37, which references subsection (a)(2)(A)-of K.S.A. 65-171d, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 201. section 22), is contrary to the findings of the Kansas Supreme Court in P̲a̲n̲h̲a̲n̲d̲l̲e̲ ̲E̲a̲s̲t̲e̲r̲n̲ ̲P̲i̲p̲e̲l̲i̲n̲e̲ ̲v̲.̲ ̲F̲a̲d̲e̲l̲e̲y̲. Such use exacts revenue from the oil and gas industry under the guise of a regulatory fee in violation of article 11, section 1 of the Kansas Constitution, and the commerce clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State Constitution. Cited herein: Kans. Const., Art. 11, section 1; U.S. Const., Fourteenth Amendment; K.S.A. 55-131; 55-143; 65-171d, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 33, section 10(f); L. 1986, ch. 201, sections 1, 2, 10, 17, 22, 28, 37, 39 and 40; and K.A.R. 28-41-1.