Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-083

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-083 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The filing of the 1875 plat of the City of McPherson did not result in a statutory dedication of Block 56 thereof to the public use of McPherson County, and the subsequent deed conveying such property to the County did not result in a common law dedication to public uses. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-401, 12-406 (as amended by L. 1984, ch. 65, section 1).

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-083

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-083 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The filing of the 1875 plat of the City of McPherson did not result in a statutory dedication of Block 56 thereof to the public use of McPherson County, and the subsequent deed conveying such property to the County did not result in a common law dedication to public uses. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-401, 12-406 (as amended by L. 1984, ch. 65, section 1).

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-091

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-091 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The legislature may refuse to appropriate moneys to provide funds for a̲ ̲p̲a̲r̲t̲i̲c̲u̲l̲a̲r̲ lease of office space already entered into by a state agency and may direct that no appropriated moneys shall be used for such purpose. However, the legislature may not prescribe that an agency may not enter into a̲n̲y̲ lease for office space without the prior approval of the State Finance Council or some other legislatively-dominated committee. Such a limitation on prospective action by a state agency violates the doctrine of separation of powers and is unconstitutional. Attorney General Opinion No. 81-83 is reaffirmed. Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-3708, 75-3711, K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 75 -3711c, 75-3725a, L. 1984, ch. 23, section 5, L. 1984, ch. 244, sections 1, 2, 23, L. 1981, ch. 32, section 69.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-008

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-008 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The provisions of subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426, which allow the legislature to reject, modify or revoke an administrative rule and regulation by means of the adoption of a concurrent resolution, are unconstitutional. Such action by the legislature is an unlawful usurpation of the governor's constitutional power to administer and enforce the laws. Such action violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers. In addition, the legislative oversight mechanism prescribed in subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426 is unconstitutional for the reason that it attempts to authorize the legislature to make law, without following the mandatory procedures of the Kansas Constitution. The Kansas constitution requires that any law be enacted only by bill [not by resolution or concurrent resolution]; that every bill contain the constitutionally-specified enacting clause; and that all bills passed by the legislature be presented to the governor for approval or disapproval. The procedure set forth in subsections (c) and (d) of K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426 does not meet these constitutional requirements and is unconstitutional. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 77-426; Kan. Const., Art. 2, sections 14, 20.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-122

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-122 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The common law doctrine of incompatibility of offices precludes one person from simultaneously holding the offices of city council member and clerk of the municipal court in a city of the third class having a mayor-council form of government. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-4108.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-106

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-106 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
As amended by chapter 282, section 5, the provisions of chapter 187, section 11 of the 1984 Session Laws prohibit the selling, giving or receiving of lists of names and addresses derived from public records, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to the persons listed therein, subject to three exceptions. Section 6 of chapter 187, as amended by section 3 of chapter 282 of the 1984 Session Laws, further requires that any person who obtains a list of names and addresses certify that: (1) he or she will not use the information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or services, and (2) will not give, sell or otherwise make available the list to another person so that the latter may sell or offer for sale any property or service. Accordingly, a person may not make commercial use of information derived from such lists, either directly or through the sale of the lists themselves. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3913; 45-201 (both repealed, L. 1984, ch. 187); 74-2012, as amended by L. 1984, ch. 282, section l; L. 1983, ch. 171, section 11, L. 1984, ch. 187, sections 6, 11; L. 1984, ch. 282, sections 3, 5.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1978-083

Attorney General Opinion No. 1978-083 PDF Author: Curt Thomas Schneider
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The provisions of House Bill No. 3050 are supported by the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109, 34 L. Ed. 2d 342, 93 S. Ct. 390 (1972).

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-023

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-023 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 8-1567 (c), (d) and (e) provide that a person convicted of a violation of the statute is not eligible for probation or suspension or reduction of sentence until the minimum time of imprisonment has been served. While the term "parole" is not specifically used, the statute must be construed to include parole within those actions which are not allowed before the minimum sentence is served. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 8-1567, K.S.A. 12-4511.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-119

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-119 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Pursuant to K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 22-4501 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲., the State Board of Indigent Defense Services has the authority to deny authorization of claims for compensation in cases where the attorneys seeking compensation were appointed without regard to the applicable system for providing legal services to indigent defendants as established by the board. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 22-4501; 22-4503; 22-4507; 22-4522; 22-4523.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-060

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-060 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
No state statute prescribes a procedure whereby a city of the third class may change from the commission form of government to the mayor-council form of government. However, the governing body of such a city may, by ordinance adopted pursuant to home rule powers, prescribe that the city shall revert to the mayor-council form of government on the date of the next city election, and provide for the election of a mayor and five council members at that election. Cited herein: K.S.A. 12-184, 12-1019, 12-1027, 12-1035, 12-1036h, 12-10a09, 13-1812, 14-1807, 15-124, 15-1201, 15-1704, Kan. Const., Art. 12, section 5.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1981-083

Attorney General Opinion No. 1981-083 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
If enacted, the proposal under consideration by the Senate Committee on Ways and Means that would statutorily require a legislative committee to approve certain leases of real property by state agencies would constitute a significant interference with the operations of the executive department in an area that is essentially executive in character, thereby violating the separation of powers doctrine. However, the legislature may exert control over the lease of office space by state agencies through appropriations, and the conditions, limitations and qualifications imposed on them, and through the enactment of substantive laws prescribing such restrictions on state agencies' powers in this regard as the legislature deems necessary and appropriate. Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-3025, K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 75-3739, 75-3765, 75-3766, 75-5411.