Asbestos Litigation Crisis in Federal and State Courts PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Asbestos Litigation Crisis in Federal and State Courts PDF full book. Access full book title Asbestos Litigation Crisis in Federal and State Courts by United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 548
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 548
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actions and defenses
Languages : en
Pages : 474
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Gerald N. Rosenberg
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226726681
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 541
Get Book Here
Book Description
In follow-up studies, dozens of reviews, and even a book of essays evaluating his conclusions, Gerald Rosenberg’s critics—not to mention his supporters—have spent nearly two decades debating the arguments he first put forward in The Hollow Hope. With this substantially expanded second edition of his landmark work, Rosenberg himself steps back into the fray, responding to criticism and adding chapters on the same-sex marriage battle that ask anew whether courts can spur political and social reform. Finding that the answer is still a resounding no, Rosenberg reaffirms his powerful contention that it’s nearly impossible to generate significant reforms through litigation. The reason? American courts are ineffective and relatively weak—far from the uniquely powerful sources for change they’re often portrayed as. Rosenberg supports this claim by documenting the direct and secondary effects of key court decisions—particularly Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. He reveals, for example, that Congress, the White House, and a determined civil rights movement did far more than Brown to advance desegregation, while pro-choice activists invested too much in Roe at the expense of political mobilization. Further illuminating these cases, as well as the ongoing fight for same-sex marriage rights, Rosenberg also marshals impressive evidence to overturn the common assumption that even unsuccessful litigation can advance a cause by raising its profile. Directly addressing its critics in a new conclusion, The Hollow Hope, Second Edition promises to reignite for a new generation the national debate it sparked seventeen years ago.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Overnight and the Courts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 204
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jay Tidmarsh
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Class actions (Civil procedure)
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actions and defenses
Languages : en
Pages : 272
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jeb Barnes
Publisher: Georgetown University Press
ISBN: 1589017862
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 150
Get Book Here
Book Description
In an era of polarization, narrow party majorities, and increasing use of supermajority requirements in the Senate, policy entrepreneurs must find ways to reach across the aisle and build bipartisan coalitions in Congress. One such coalition-building strategy is the “politics of efficiency,” or reform that is aimed at eliminating waste from existing policies and programs. After all, reducing inefficiency promises to reduce costs without cutting benefits, which should appeal to members of both political parties, especially given tight budgetary constraints in Washington. Dust-Up explores the most recent congressional efforts to reform asbestos litigation—a case in which the politics of efficiency played a central role and seemed likely to prevail. Yet, these efforts failed to produce a winning coalition, even though reform could have saved billions of dollars and provided quicker compensation to victims of asbestos-related diseases. Why? The answers, as Jeb Barnes deftly illustrates, defy conventional wisdom and force us to rethink the political effects of litigation and the dynamics of institutional change in our fragmented policymaking system. Set squarely at the intersection of law, politics, and public policy, Dust-Up provides the first in-depth analysis of the political obstacles to Congress in replacing a form of litigation that nearly everyone—Supreme Court justices, members of Congress, presidents, and experts—agrees is woefully inefficient and unfair to both victims and businesses. This concise and accessible case study includes a glossary of terms and study questions, making it a perfect fit for courses in law and public policy, congressional politics, and public health.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Asbestos
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts and Administrative Practice
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche.
Author: Cass R. Sunstein
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226780163
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 299
Get Book Here
Book Description
Over the past two decades, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the number and magnitude of punitive damages verdicts rendered by juries in civil trials. Probably the most extraordinary example is the July 2000 award of $144.8 billion in the Florida class action lawsuit brought against cigarette manufacturers. Or consider two recent verdicts against the auto manufacturer BMW in Alabama. In identical cases, argued in the same court before the same judge, one jury awarded $4 million in punitive damages, while the other awarded no punitive damages at all. In cases involving accidents, civil rights, and the environment, multimillion-dollar punitive awards have been a subject of intense controversy. But how do juries actually make decisions about punitive damages? To find out, the authors-experts in psychology, economics, and the law-present the results of controlled experiments with more than 600 mock juries involving the responses of more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens. Although juries tended to agree in their moral judgments about the defendant's conduct, they rendered erratic and unpredictable dollar awards. The experiments also showed that instead of moderating juror verdicts, the process of jury deliberation produced a striking "severity shift" toward ever-higher awards. Jurors also tended to ignore instructions from the judges; were influenced by whatever amount the plaintiff happened to request; showed "hindsight bias," believing that what happened should have been foreseen; and penalized corporations that had based their decisions on careful cost-benefit analyses. While judges made many of the same errors, they performed better in some areas, suggesting that judges (or other specialists) may be better equipped than juries to decide punitive damages. Using a wealth of new experimental data, and offering a host of provocative findings, this book documents a wide range of systematic biases in jury behavior. It will be indispensable for anyone interested not only in punitive damages, but also jury behavior, psychology, and how people think about punishment.
