Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice PDF full book. Access full book title Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice by P. J. Richardson. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: P. J. Richardson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: P. J. Richardson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Frederick Archbold
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 1722
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780414080881
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mark Lucraft
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780414080744
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 3580
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Frederick ARCHBOLD
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 946
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Great Britain: Law Commission
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780102971170
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Get Book Here
Book Description
This project addressed the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Currently, too much expert opinion evidence is admitted without adequate scrutiny because no clear test is being applied to determine whether the evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted. Juries may therefore be reaching conclusions on the basis of unreliable evidence, as confirmed by a number of miscarriages of justice in recent years. Following consultation on a discussion paper (LCCP 190, 2009, ISDBN 9780118404655) the Commission recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. The draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill published with the report (as Appendix A) sets out the admissibility test and also provides the guidance judges would need when applying the test, setting out the key reasons why an expert's opinion evidence might be unreliable. The Bill also codifies (with slight modifications) the uncontroversial aspects of the present law, so that all the admissibility requirements for expert evidence would be set out in a single Act of Parliament and carry equal authority.
Author: John Frederick Archbold
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 884
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Jervis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 952
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Frederick Archbold
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 932
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Torsten Stirner
Publisher: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
ISBN: 9004463135
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 520
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book provides a comparative assessment of the procedural law governing facts and evidence with references to over 900 judgments and decisions of the European and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights as well as the UN Human Rights Committee. It identifies underlying principles which govern the procedural law of these international human rights institutions. Based on the premise of a contextualized procedural law governing facts and evidence, the book analyzes where current approaches lack a foundation in the contextualization premise and offers solutions for recurring procedural problems relating to questions of subsidiarity in fact-finding, burden and standard of proof, as well as the admissibility and evaluation of evidence.
