5-year RCT Comparing 5 Mm-short Implants with Longer Implants in Augmented Posterior Atrophic Jaws

5-year RCT Comparing 5 Mm-short Implants with Longer Implants in Augmented Posterior Atrophic Jaws PDF Author: Carlo Barausse
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Purpose: To evaluate whether 5-mm short dental implants could be an alternative to augmen- tation with anorganic bovine bone and placement of at least 10-mm long implants in posterior atrophic jaws.Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles (5 to 7 mm bone height above the mandibular canal) and 15 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae (4 to 6 mm bone height below the maxillary sinus), and bone thickness of at least 8 mm, were randomised according to a split-mouth design to receive one to three 5-mm short implants or at least 10-mm long implants in augmented bone. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional bone blocks and maxillary sinuses with particulated bone via a lateral window. Implants were placed after 4 months, submerged and loaded, after another 4 months, with provisional pros- theses. Four months later, definitive provisionally cemented prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and peri-implant marginal bone level changes.Results: In five augmented mandibles the planned 10-mm long implants could not be placed and shorter implants (7.0 and 8.5 mm) had to be used instead. Five years after loading, six patients, five treated in the mandible and one in the maxilla, dropped out. Three prostheses (one mandibu- lar and two maxillary) failed in the short-implant group versus none in the long-implant group. In mandibles one long implant failed versus two short implants in one patient. In maxillae one long implant failed versus three short implants in two patients. There were no statistically signifi- cant differences in implant (n = 26; P = 1.00, difference = 3.85%, 95% CI: u221212.95% to 20.64%) and prosthetic (n = 26; P = 0.250, difference = 11.54%, 95% CI: u22120.74% to 23.82%) failures. Eleven patients had 16 complications at short implants (one patient accounted for six complica- tions) and 12 patients had 14 complications at long implants. There were no statistically signifi- cant differences in complications (n = 28; P = 1.00, difference = u22123.57%, 95% CI: u221230.65% to 23.51%). Five years after loading, patients with mandibular implants lost on average 1.72 mm at short implants and 2.10 mm at long implants of peri-implant marginal bone. This difference was statistically significant (difference = 0.37 u00b1 0.43 mm; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.68 mm; P = 0.022). In maxillae, patients lost on average 1.31 mm at short implants and 1.79 mm at long implants. This difference was statistically significant (difference = 0.48 u00b1 0.43 mm; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.74 mm; P = 0.002).