Author: United States. Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (Replacement), Mississippi River, Alton, Illinois
Author: United States. Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 116
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Revised Draft, Supplement Environmental Statement: pt.2. Text: Section nine (Coordination with others)
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 1078
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 1078
Book Description
The Replacement of Alton Locks and Dam 26
Author: United States. Dept. of Transportation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alton Locks and Dam 26
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alton Locks and Dam 26
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Design Memorandum No. 11, Formulation Evaluation Report
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alton (Ill.)
Languages : en
Pages : 716
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alton (Ill.)
Languages : en
Pages : 716
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Revised Draft, Supplement Environmental Statement: pt.2. Text: Section nine (Coordination with others)
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Draft Environmental Statement Supplement
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 1020
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 1020
Book Description
Locks and Dam No.26 (replacement), Mississippi River, Alton, IL (MO,IL)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 926
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 926
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Revised Draft, Supplement Environmental Statement
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Locks and Dam No. 26 (replacement), Upper Mississippi River Basin, Mississippi River - Alton, Illinois, Missouri and Illinois: Final Environmental Statement
Author: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 626
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dams
Languages : en
Pages : 626
Book Description
Inland Navigation System Planning
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 9780309074056
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
In 1988, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began an investigation of the benefits and costs of extending several locks on the lower portion of the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway (UMR-IWW) in order to relieve increasing waterway congestion, particularly for grain moving to New Orleans for export. With passage of the Flood Control Act of 1936, Congress required that the Corps conduct a benefit-cost analysis as part of its water resources project planning; Congress will fund water resources projects only if a project's benefits exceed its costs. As economic analysis generally, and benefit-cost analysis in particular, has become more sophisticated, and as environmental and social considerations and analysis have become more important, Corps planning studies have grown in size and complexity. The difficulty in commensurating market and nonmarket costs and benefits also presents the Corps with a significant challenge. The Corps' analysis of the UMR-IWW has extended over a decade, has cost roughly $50 million, and has involved consultations with other federal agencies, state conservation agencies, and local citizens. The analysis has included many consultants and has produced dozens of reports. In February 2000, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) requested that the National Academies review the Corps' final feasibility report. After discussions and negotiations with DOD, in April 2000 the National Academies launched this review and appointed an expert committee to carry it out.
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 9780309074056
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
In 1988, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began an investigation of the benefits and costs of extending several locks on the lower portion of the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway (UMR-IWW) in order to relieve increasing waterway congestion, particularly for grain moving to New Orleans for export. With passage of the Flood Control Act of 1936, Congress required that the Corps conduct a benefit-cost analysis as part of its water resources project planning; Congress will fund water resources projects only if a project's benefits exceed its costs. As economic analysis generally, and benefit-cost analysis in particular, has become more sophisticated, and as environmental and social considerations and analysis have become more important, Corps planning studies have grown in size and complexity. The difficulty in commensurating market and nonmarket costs and benefits also presents the Corps with a significant challenge. The Corps' analysis of the UMR-IWW has extended over a decade, has cost roughly $50 million, and has involved consultations with other federal agencies, state conservation agencies, and local citizens. The analysis has included many consultants and has produced dozens of reports. In February 2000, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) requested that the National Academies review the Corps' final feasibility report. After discussions and negotiations with DOD, in April 2000 the National Academies launched this review and appointed an expert committee to carry it out.