Author: West Publishing CompanyPublisher: Rarebooksclub.com
ISBN: 9781230072289
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1192
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... in whole. (55 OW. 622) BOARD OF COM'RS OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY v. DE ARMOND, County Stenographer. (No. 6402.) (Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Feb. 15, 1916.) (Byllabu by the CourtJ Goubts =57--Demurrer To Evidence--Fees Unlawfully Retained. Record examined, and held not error to sustain a demurrer to the evidence. Ed. Note.--For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. 198-200; Dec, Dig. S=57J Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 4. Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge. Action by the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County against Verna De Armond, County Stenographer of Oklahoma County. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. See, also, 155 Pac 592. D. K. Pope, Co. Atty., of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff In error. Grant Stanley, of Oklahoma City, for defendant In error. BLEAKMORB, C. This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county. The parties appear here as In the trial court. By the petition It Is alleged, in substance, that the defendant, while employed as county stenographer by appointment of the judge of the county court of Oklahoma county, collected and retained divers sums of money for services in making transcripts of her stenographic notes of testimony and copies of the pleadings and records in certain proceedings had in said county court, which under the law should have been paid, or caused to be paid, into the county treasury, and prayed that she be required to account for the sums so received and retained by her, and for judgment therefor. Defendant answered by way of general denial. Upon trial to the court a demurrer was sustained to the evidence and judgment rendered for defendant. The county has appealed. The defendant was called and..."
