The Limits of Judicial Independence

The Limits of Judicial Independence PDF Author: Tom S. Clark
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139492314
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 357

Get Book

Book Description
This book investigates the causes and consequences of congressional attacks on the US Supreme Court, arguing that the extent of public support for judicial independence constitutes the practical limit of judicial independence. First, the book presents a historical overview of Court-curbing proposals in Congress. Then, building on interviews with Supreme Court justices, members of Congress, and judicial and legislative staffers, the book theorizes that congressional attacks are driven by public discontent with the Court. From this theoretical model, predictions are derived about the decision to engage in Court-curbing and judicial responsiveness to Court-curbing activity in Congress. The Limits of Judicial Independence draws on illustrative archival evidence, systematic analysis of an original dataset of Court-curbing proposals introduced in Congress from 1877 onward and judicial decisions.

The Limits of Judicial Independence

The Limits of Judicial Independence PDF Author: Tom S. Clark
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139492314
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 357

Get Book

Book Description
This book investigates the causes and consequences of congressional attacks on the US Supreme Court, arguing that the extent of public support for judicial independence constitutes the practical limit of judicial independence. First, the book presents a historical overview of Court-curbing proposals in Congress. Then, building on interviews with Supreme Court justices, members of Congress, and judicial and legislative staffers, the book theorizes that congressional attacks are driven by public discontent with the Court. From this theoretical model, predictions are derived about the decision to engage in Court-curbing and judicial responsiveness to Court-curbing activity in Congress. The Limits of Judicial Independence draws on illustrative archival evidence, systematic analysis of an original dataset of Court-curbing proposals introduced in Congress from 1877 onward and judicial decisions.

The Limits of Judicial Power

The Limits of Judicial Power PDF Author: William Lasser
Publisher: UNC Press Books
ISBN: 1469632462
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 368

Get Book

Book Description
Lasser examines in detail four periods during which the Court was widely charged with overstepping its constitutional power: the late 1850s, with the Dred Scott case and its aftermath; the Reconstruction era; the New Deal era; and the years of the Warren and Burger Courts after 1954. His thorough analysis of the most controversial decisions convincingly demonstrates that the Court has much more power to withstand political reprisal than is commonly assumed. Originally published in 1988. A UNC Press Enduring Edition -- UNC Press Enduring Editions use the latest in digital technology to make available again books from our distinguished backlist that were previously out of print. These editions are published unaltered from the original, and are presented in affordable paperback formats, bringing readers both historical and cultural value.

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court PDF Author: Kermit L. Hall
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1135691533
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 506

Get Book

Book Description
Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society

Judicial Review

Judicial Review PDF Author: C. T. Emery
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780421345300
Category : Contrôle juridictionnel de l'administration - Grande-Bretagne
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book

Book Description


Repugnant Laws

Repugnant Laws PDF Author: Keith E. Whittington
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 0700630368
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 432

Get Book

Book Description
When the Supreme Court strikes down favored legislation, politicians cry judicial activism. When the law is one politicians oppose, the court is heroically righting a wrong. In our polarized moment of partisan fervor, the Supreme Court’s routine work of judicial review is increasingly viewed through a political lens, decried by one side or the other as judicial overreach, or “legislating from the bench.” But is this really the case? Keith E. Whittington asks in Repugnant Laws, a first-of-its-kind history of judicial review. A thorough examination of the record of judicial review requires first a comprehensive inventory of relevant cases. To this end, Whittington revises the extant catalog of cases in which the court has struck down a federal statute and adds to this, for the first time, a complete catalog of cases upholding laws of Congress against constitutional challenges. With reference to this inventory, Whittington is then able to offer a reassessment of the prevalence of judicial review, an account of how the power of judicial review has evolved over time, and a persuasive challenge to the idea of an antidemocratic, heroic court. In this analysis, it becomes apparent that that the court is political and often partisan, operating as a political ally to dominant political coalitions; vulnerable and largely unable to sustain consistent opposition to the policy priorities of empowered political majorities; and quasi-independent, actively exercising the power of judicial review to pursue the justices’ own priorities within bounds of what is politically tolerable. The court, Repugnant Laws suggests, is a political institution operating in a political environment to advance controversial principles, often with the aid of political leaders who sometimes encourage and generally tolerate the judicial nullification of federal laws because it serves their own interests to do so. In the midst of heated battles over partisan and activist Supreme Court justices, Keith Whittington’s work reminds us that, for better or for worse, the court reflects the politics of its time.

The Limits of Judicial Power

The Limits of Judicial Power PDF Author: William Lasser
Publisher: UNC Press Books
ISBN: 1469632462
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 368

Get Book

Book Description
Lasser examines in detail four periods during which the Court was widely charged with overstepping its constitutional power: the late 1850s, with the Dred Scott case and its aftermath; the Reconstruction era; the New Deal era; and the years of the Warren and Burger Courts after 1954. His thorough analysis of the most controversial decisions convincingly demonstrates that the Court has much more power to withstand political reprisal than is commonly assumed. Originally published in 1988. A UNC Press Enduring Edition -- UNC Press Enduring Editions use the latest in digital technology to make available again books from our distinguished backlist that were previously out of print. These editions are published unaltered from the original, and are presented in affordable paperback formats, bringing readers both historical and cultural value.

Judicial Self-limitation

Judicial Self-limitation PDF Author: William Ogden Farber
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judicial review
Languages : en
Pages : 622

Get Book

Book Description


Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power

Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power PDF Author: Rainer Arnold
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 3319551868
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 446

Get Book

Book Description
Judicial control of public power ensures a guarantee of the rule of law. This book addresses the scope and limits of judicial control at the national level, i.e. the control of public authorities, and at the supranational level, i.e. the control of States. It explores the risk of judicial review leading to judicial activism that can threaten the principle of the separation of powers or the legitimate exercise of state powers. It analyzes how national and supranational legal systems have embodied certain mechanisms, such as the principles of reasonableness, proportionality, deference and margin of appreciation, as well as the horizontal effects of human rights that help to determine how far a judge can go. Taking a theoretical and comparative view, the book first examines the conceptual bases of the various control systems and then studies the models, structural elements, and functions of the control instruments in selected countries and regions. It uses country and regional reports as the basis for the comparison of the convergences and divergences of the implementation of control in certain countries of Europe, Latin America, and Africa. The book’s theoretical reflections and comparative investigations provide answers to important questions, such as whether or not there are nascent universal principles concerning the control of public power, how strong the impact of particular legal traditions is, and to what extent international law concepts have had harmonizing and strengthening effects on internal public-power control.

The Limits of Judicial Review

The Limits of Judicial Review PDF Author: Carolyn Stewart Dyer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aircraft accidents
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book

Book Description


The Supreme Court on Trial

The Supreme Court on Trial PDF Author: Kent Roach
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 372

Get Book

Book Description
This book addresses timely questions: What is judicial activism? Can judges simply read their own political preferences into the Charter? Does the Court have the last word over democratically elected legislatures? Are our judges captives of special interests? What can Canadians and their governments do if they think the Court has got it wrong?