Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of the Academic Library's Virtual Reference Services PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of the Academic Library's Virtual Reference Services PDF full book. Access full book title Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of the Academic Library's Virtual Reference Services by Primary Research Group Inc.. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables.Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that:?69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service.?Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males.?Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39. ?Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%).
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables.Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that:?69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service.?Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males.?Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39. ?Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%).
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category : Academic libraries
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables. Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that: 69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service ; Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males ; Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39 ; Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%). (---publisher's website)
Author: Primary Research Group
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category : Electronic reference services (Libraries)
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks at the incidence and volume of faculty use of virtual reference services operated by academic libraries. Survey participants describe their use of virtual reference and their extent of familiarly with it. It also looks at the extent to which virtual reference acts as a gateway to other library services, including consultations with library subject specialists. Data in the report is based on a survey of 725 faculty at nearly 500 higher education institutions in the United States. Data is broken out by 12 personal and institutional variables including size, type or Carnegie class, tuition level and public/private status of the participant's affiliated institutions, as well as personal characteristics such as academic field, tenure status, academic title, gender, income and other variables. Just a few of this 53-page report's many findings are that: 69.24% of faculty surveyed have ever used the academic library virtual reference service ; Use of the virtual reference service was more common by females than by males ; Virtual reference opened new paths to the use of library resources especially for faculty aged 31 to 39 ; Broken out by race or ethnicity, African American faculty were the most likely to feel that there was a library subject specialist for their field (63.04%) while Hispanic faculty were the least likely (38.46%). (---publisher's website)
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Get Book
Book Description
The Survey of Higher Education Faculty: Use of Library Reference, Info Literacy and Subject Specialist Staff, ISBN 1-57440-138-6, presents data on how higher education faculty in the United States & Canada use the virtual reference services, subject specialists and info literacy staff of their academic library. It includes specific data on the percentage of faculty that use virtual reference, how often they use it, and similar data on awareness and use of library subject specialists, as well as data on contact with information literacy staff and tendency to incorporate info literacy concepts into teaching.
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this 65-page report's many findings are that: ?Use of other institutions libraries was greatest among faculty in history and journalism, of which 73.68% and 76.92% of faculty respectively had used the academic library of another institution.?Faculty from BA-level institutions were more aware than those of other types of colleges and universities of the existence of resource-sharing agreements between their own and other institution's libraries.?By academic title, adjuncts were the least satisfied with resource-sharing arrangements.
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study looks closely at the use of proxies by higher education faculty to retrieve items from or represent them at academic libraries. Such programs have become more popular in recent years as more faculty work remotely and visit the library less. Some libraires have found them useful in maintaining faculty links to the library, particularly to print and audio-visual items. The report gives detailed data on the percentage and type of faculty who have used such proxy programs, and the extent of their use. In addition, Just a few of the findings from this 43-page report are that: ?Older faculty tended to be more aware of this policy than younger ones; 68.01% of faculty over age 60 felt such a policy existed vs. only 46.67% of faculty under age 30.?Use was greater by faculty who considered themselves political conservatives than those on the left wing of the political spectrum. Data in the report is based on a survey of 954 higher education faculty from nearly 500 institutions; data is broken out by a broad range of personal and institutional variables including age, gender, work title, academic field, personal income level, type of higher education institution, and other useful variables.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category : Academic libraries
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
"This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others." -- from publisher website
Author: Primary Research Group
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This 77-page report gives extensive and detailed data on who, how often, and for what kinds of materials, do faculty request that their academic libraries make purchases of new materials. The study also gives detailed data on just how often such requests are fulfilled and for whom, enabling readers of the study to compare effective fulfillment rates - for example - for male vs female faculty, or full professors vs. instructors or associate professors - or Caucasian vs. Asian origin faculty - or faculty in visual arts vs. those in economics or history. The study gives unique data sets for requests for each of the following types of materials; databases, journals and other periodicals, print books, eBooks, and audio-visual resources. For each type of resource, the study shows which faculty most often make requests, and 13 tables of data highlight demand for each type of resources. Just a few of this unique report's many findings are that: Faculty in history were the most likely to consider their library extremely responsive to their requests.The likelihood of requesting the library to purchase a print book was strongly positively correlated with the personal age of the respondent.Nearly 27% of tenured faculty had ever requested their library to order an eBook for them.Respondents at private colleges made more than twice the number of new materials requests per capita to their academic libraries than faculty from public colleges.This 77-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others.
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
This study gives extensive data on how US higher education faculty use course reserves, particularly through their academic libraries. The study helps its readers to answer questions such as: which faculty use course reserves? How much? How satisfied are they with the services academic libraries provide for course reserves? Do they put print materials on course reserve? Digital materials? How easy is it to use course reserves? How easy is it to integrate course reserves with course management systems? What can be done to improve course reserve systems? This 70-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this report's many findings are that: 34.43% of adjunct faculty in the sample put materials on course reserve in the academic library. 37.22% of faculty felt it was very easy to put materials on course reserve. Faculty of Asian origin were much more likely than others to worry that they were abrogating copyright or licensing strictures when they put materials on course reserve. Faculty at the smallest colleges were particularly dissatisfied with the ease of integrating content on course reserve into course management systems.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book
Book Description
