Revised Recovery Plan for the Lost River Sucker (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris) PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Revised Recovery Plan for the Lost River Sucker (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris) PDF full book. Access full book title Revised Recovery Plan for the Lost River Sucker (Deltistes Luxatus) and Shortnose Sucker (Chasmistes Brevirostris) by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 122
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kevin Stubbs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bald eagle
Languages : en
Pages : 302
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Miguel F. Barajas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Lost River sucker
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Get Book Here
Book Description
Listed as endangered in 1988, the Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and Shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris) were once abundant and widely distributed in the Klamath Basin in Southern Oregon and Northern California. Populations of both species have been declining since the late 1960’s. Factors thought responsible for declines include naturally occurring disturbances (e.g., periodic drought), water resource and land development activities, degradation of habitat and water quality, and interactions with introduced exotic species. Detection of any substantial adult recruitment for the last few decades has been minimal. We used a quantitative decision modeling approach to explore potential outcomes of alternative conservation strategies that include captive propagation and catch, grow, and release. Uncertainty about the factors responsible for the apparent lack of recruitment was represented using alternative models of system dynamics. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the model predictions were highly sensitive to population dynamics during early life stages and the alternative ideas of system dynamics. To address these uncertainties, I propose an adaptive approach to sucker recovery that integrates monitoring, research, and management.
Author: Kevin Stubbs
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 130
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Daniel Joseph Logan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
Upper Klamath Lake in southern Oregon has two species of lacustrine suckers, Lost River sucker Deltistes luxatus and shortnose sucker Chasmistes brevirostris that were historically abundant. Results of surveys performed in the mid-1980's indicated that populations of both species were declining and ageing with apparent recruitment failure in most years since 1970. In 1988 both species were listed as endangered species and high priority has been placed on investigating recruitment of Upper Klamath Lake suckers. Lapilli are the preferred otolith for ageing suckers. Lapilli form predictably on the day of hatch, have the most conservative morphology of the three otoliths, and deposit easily discernable increments that begin on the day of hatch and proceed daily, and grow in a predictable relationship with somatic growth. Ages estimated by otolith analysis and resulting hatch dates of young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker were consistent annually and consistent with reported spawning period for suckers from Upper Klamath Lake. Otolith increment analysis is necessarily lethal, whereas scale circuli analysis is not lethal. My findings suggest that scale circuli count is an inefficient estimator of daily Daily age estimates for age in young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker. any given circuli count varied by approximately 51 days in Lost River sucker and 30 days Additionally, my results do not accurately predict the size or age at in shortnose sucker. which scales are formed, thereby invalidating an assumption of age and growth models. Consequently, scale circuli analysis cannot be used to produce accurate estimates of age or growth for young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker. Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker achieve a relatively large size by the autumn of their first year, consistent with other members of Catostomidae. Interspecific difference in growth rates was evident in each year with Lost River sucker exhibiting faster growth than shortnose sucker in each year. Abundance of young-of-the-year suckers does not appear to be strongly correlated to somatic growth rate, though hatch date and environmental parameters are highly correlated with abundance. In both Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker, in years with the highest abundance (1991 and 1993), the mean hatch dates of surviving fish were later than in years with the lowest abundance. Also, young-of-the-year Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker experienced wide environmental fluctuations in Upper Klamath Lake as seasonal limnological and climatic variation create a dynamic habitat for young suckers. Water temperature, precipitation, air temperature, and minimum lake elevation are all strongly correlated to abundance of young-of-the-year suckers.
Author: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781497346710
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 86
Get Book Here
Book Description
Federally endangered Lost River sucker Deltistes luxatus and shortnose sucker Chasmistes brevirostris were once abundant throughout their range but populations have declined; they have been extirpated from several lakes, and may no longer reproduce in others. Poor recruitment into the adult spawning populations is one of several reasons cited for the decline and lack of recovery of these species, and may be the consequence of high mortality during juvenile life stages. High larval and juvenile sucker mortality may be exacerbated by an insufficient quantity of suitable rearing habitat. Within Upper Klamath Lake, a lack of marshes also may allow larval suckers to be swept from suitable rearing areas downstream into the seasonally anoxic waters of the Keno Reservoir.
Author: U S Department of the Interior
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781496184146
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 62
Get Book Here
Book Description
Lost River sucker Deltistes luxatus and shortnose sucker Chasmistes brevirostris were listed as endangered in 1988 for a variety of reasons including apparent recruitment failure. Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and its tributaries are considered the most critical remaining habitat for these two species. Age-0 suckers are often abundant in Upper Klamath Lake throughout the summer months, but catches decline dramatically between late August and early September each year, and age-1 and older subadult suckers are rare. These rapid declines in catch rates and a lack of substantial recruitment into adult sucker populations in recent years suggests sucker populations experience high mortality between their first summer and first spawn. A lack of optimal rearing habitat may exacerbate juvenile sucker mortality or restrict juvenile growth or development.
Author: Susan A. Reithel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Catostomidae
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Get Book Here
Book Description
Larval transport and retention of two endangered suckers were studied in a highly altered lacustrine/riverine complex. The endangered populations of Lost River sucker, Deltistes luxatus, and shortnose sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris, in Upper Klamath Lake (UKL), Oregon are the largest remnant populations of these suckers. Downstream of UKL, the Keno Impoundment is a seasonally lethal, anoxic habitat. We investigated species densities and hatch date differences between larvae retained in Upper Klamath Lake and those transported below the Link River Dam into the Keno Impoundment. In 2004, larval and juvenile Lost River suckers were captured in greater densities below the dam. Larval shortnose suckers were captured in greater densities in UKL while juveniles were captured in equal densities above and below the dam. Lost River suckers had earlier hatch dates than shortnose suckers and individuals below the dam had earlier average hatch dates for both species. These patterns suggest that, in 2004, early spawned fish, especially Lost River suckers, were more likely to be transported from Upper Klamath Lake while shortnose suckers were more likely to be retained.
