Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Even before the passage of the Communications Act of 19341 it was clear that the states and the federal government share responsibility for regulating the provision of communications services that are offered over the same physical facilities.2 The 1934 Act codified this jurisdictional separation. [...] Sections 1 and 2(a) of the Act grant the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") authority over interstate communications services,3 while Section 2(b) generally denies the FCC jurisdiction to regulate the rates, terms, and conditions of intrastate offerings.4 In some important respects the Telecommunications Act of 1996 enhanced the regulatory authority of the FCC vis-a-vis the states. [...] Page 2 Progress on Point 9.1 the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to offer even intrastate service.5 And, of course, the 1996 Act gave the FCC primary authority to implement the local competition provisions of Sections 251 and 252 of the Act, including the issuance of rules governing the availability and pricing of unbundled pieces of the incumbent telephone companies' networks.6 In. [...] 3 Does the state require unbundling and sharing of the incumbent's facilities in excess of that required under the FCC's rules? In implementing the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the FCC has issued rules which define the extent to which the incumbent's local exchange network must be unbundled and shared with the incumbent's competitors. [...] Rules that force firms to share every resource or element of a business would create not competition, but pervasive regulation, for the regulators, not the marketplace, would set the relevant terms."13 To the extent that a state requires any level of unbundling and sharing of network facilities in addition to the excessive amount already mandated by the FCC, its actions hinder the development of l.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The 1934 Act codified the sharing of juris- dictional authority, granting the Federal Communications Commission authority over interstate services while giving the states much of the authority to regulate the rates, terms, and conditions of intrastate offerings. [...] The act also gave the fcc primary authori- ty to implement several local telephone competition provisions contained in the legislation, including the issuance of rules gov- erning the availability and pricing of unbundled pieces of the incumbent telephone companies' local networks. [...] Does the state require additional unbundling and sharing of the incumbent's facilities? In implementing the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the fcc has issued rules that define the extent to which the incum- bent's local exchange network must be unbundled and shared with competitors. [...] To the extent that a state requires any level of unbundling and sharing in addition to the amount already mandated by the fcc, its actions hinder the develop- ment of local competition and are not deregulatory. [...] In order for the state's consumers to benefit from the additional competi- tion in the (increasingly less distinct) long distance and local marketplaces, the state must have a process in place that facil- itates timely and rational consideration of the application.
Author: Jeffrey A. Eisenach
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1461515211
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 238
Get Book Here
Book Description
Communications markets have made much progress towards competition and deregulation in recent years. However, it is increasingly clear, in the age of the Internet and the digital revolution, that much more needs to be done, and that new approaches, both at the Federal Communications Commission and in Congress, will be required to complete the task. In this volume, the Progress and Freedom Foundation presents nine papers by communications policy experts and government policymakers that show how to finish the job of deregulating communications markets and reforming the FCC. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was a landmark piece of legislation for an industry moving from a monopoly orientation towards competition, but additional steps are needed to complete the process of implementing the pro-competitive, deregulatory vision of the act. Bringing together a group of the caliber represented in this book makes possible the best recommendations about the exact nature of those necessary changes. In this volume, the most difficult and politically-charged hot-button issues involving local and long distance competition, universal service, spectrum allocation, program content regulation, and the public interest doctrine are confronted head-on. As importantly, the authors recommend specific reform proposals to be considered by the Federal Communications Commission and Congress. The ideas contained in the experts' essays were presented and debated at a conference hosted by The Progress & Freedom Foundation, which was held in Washington, DC, on December 8, 2000. The Progress & Freedom Foundation studies the impact of the digital revolution and its implications for public policy. It conducts research in fields such as electronic commerce, telecommunications and the impact of the Internet on government, society and economic growth. It also studies issues such as the need to reform government regulation, especially in technology-intensive fields such as medical innovation, energy and environmental regulation.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, and Finance
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Competition
Languages : en
Pages : 626
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Tom W. Bell
Publisher: Cato Institute
ISBN: 9781882577682
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has failed to fulfill its deregulatory promise. The act in many cases has replaced regulated monopoly with eerily similar regulated competition. Only markets that are truly free will innovate and remain healthy in the long run. These essays suggest how to move toward free markets in telecommunications.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications, Consumer Protection, and Finance
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Competition
Languages : en
Pages : 548
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Thomas James Duesterberg
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Get Book Here
Book Description
According to this book, the anticipated benefits of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 are proving elusive, as competiton has been slow to rise, and government agencies have been slow to implement the deregulation and market-opening processes specified in the new law. The authors argue that the pace of innovation and the telecom industry's demonstrated capacity to restructure itself efficiently show that the benefits of competition far outweigh the costs of trying to micromanage the industry through regulation.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Business Rights, and Competition
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Thomas W. Hazlett
Publisher: Pacific Research Institute
ISBN:
Category : Computers
Languages : en
Pages : 130
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Karl E. Case
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780934842488
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 142
Get Book Here
Book Description
