Private Forestry in Western Oregon PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Private Forestry in Western Oregon PDF full book. Access full book title Private Forestry in Western Oregon by Gary Lettman. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Gary Lettman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest management
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Gary Lettman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest management
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Sally J. Campbell
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forests and forestry
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Gary Lettman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest landowners
Languages : en
Pages : 48
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest landowners
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
Oregon State University researchers conducted a survey in 1994 of non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners in western Oregon and western Washington. Private forests provide valuable ecological services, such as fish and wildlife habitat, and are also partially filling the gap created by recent reductions in federal timber harvest in the region. The purpose of the study was to assess demographic characteristics, timber management practices, harvest decisions, attitudes toward government regulation, and the use of government assistance by NIPF landowners in western Oregon and western Washington. NIPF owners are a very heterogenous class with diverse objectives, ranging from timber production to the enjoyment of owning "green space". Most of the owners surveyed had harvested timber from their land and had used a variety of methods, including clearcuts (28%) and thinnings and other partial cuts (60%). A majority (68%) said they would alter the amount and timing of their harvest if it were necessary to maintain a healthy ecosystem. However, most owners would not be willing to give up their right to harvest timber altogether, even if offered a tax incentive. Many of the results differed between owners of large acreages and owners of small acreages.
Author: Daolan Zheng
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Clearing of land
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Family-owned business enterprises
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture. Subcommittee on Forests
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest management
Languages : en
Pages : 264
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Oregon State Board of Forestry
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest management
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Donald R. Gedney
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forests and forestry
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Randall R. Schillinger
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Forest management
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Get Book Here
Book Description
Management restrictions are simulated on streamside acres owned by private interests in western Oregon to assess forest inventory and log market implications. A dynamic, nonlinear optimization model of western Oregon's softwood log market simulates the resource and economic impacts of set-aside and minimum harvest age restrictions on forest acreage within 40 meters of water on private lands from 1995 to 2045. Without restrictions, about 49 percent of log market surplus is attained by producers, while the consumers' (mills) portion is 17 percent and the trade sector earns the remaining 34 percent. Streamside management constraints take up to 19 percent of the forestland out of production. When this acreage is set-aside from harvest, periodic softwood harvest levels drop by 15 to 26 percent and log prices rise by 7 to 10 percent. The average value of a bare forest acre further than 40 meters from water rises by 13 percent. The increase in log prices and land values does not offset the loss in management choices. The present value of producers' surplus drops by 11 percent, while consumers' surplus drops by 30 percent.
