Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide ACT (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): Nos. 1276-1295 (Classic Reprint) PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide ACT (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): Nos. 1276-1295 (Classic Reprint) PDF full book. Access full book title Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide ACT (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): Nos. 1276-1295 (Classic Reprint) by United States Department Of Agriculture. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States Department Of Agriculture
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780365561811
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): Nos. 1276-1295 This case was based on an interstate shipment of Acme 2 Way spray which) was recommended, among other uses, as a spray for sour-cherry trees, and; which would be injurious to sour-cherry trees when used as directed. On September 17, 1932, the United States attorney for the District of Oregon, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against the Acme White Lead Color Works, a corpora tion trading at Portland, Oreg, alleging shipment by said company, in viola tion of the Insecticide Act of 1910, on or about January 5, 1932, from the State of Oregon into the State of Washington, of a quantity of Acme 2 Way spray that was adulterated and misbranded. It was alleged in the information that the article was adulterated in that it was intended for use on vegetation, namely, sour cherry trees, and the article when used as a spray upon sour cherry trees as directed, would be injurious to such vegetation. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements on the label, For sour cherries, use 7 pounds of Acme 2 Way Spray to, 50 gallons of water or 10 tablespoonfuls to 1 gallon of water borne on. The package label, were false and misleading and by reason of the statements the article was labeled so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since the article, when used as directed, could not be used as a spray for all sour cherry trees, but such use would cause serious injury thereto. On January 11, 1933, a plea of guilty to the information was entered om behalf of the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $10. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: United States Department Of Agriculture
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780365561811
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): Nos. 1276-1295 This case was based on an interstate shipment of Acme 2 Way spray which) was recommended, among other uses, as a spray for sour-cherry trees, and; which would be injurious to sour-cherry trees when used as directed. On September 17, 1932, the United States attorney for the District of Oregon, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against the Acme White Lead Color Works, a corpora tion trading at Portland, Oreg, alleging shipment by said company, in viola tion of the Insecticide Act of 1910, on or about January 5, 1932, from the State of Oregon into the State of Washington, of a quantity of Acme 2 Way spray that was adulterated and misbranded. It was alleged in the information that the article was adulterated in that it was intended for use on vegetation, namely, sour cherry trees, and the article when used as a spray upon sour cherry trees as directed, would be injurious to such vegetation. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements on the label, For sour cherries, use 7 pounds of Acme 2 Way Spray to, 50 gallons of water or 10 tablespoonfuls to 1 gallon of water borne on. The package label, were false and misleading and by reason of the statements the article was labeled so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since the article, when used as directed, could not be used as a spray for all sour cherry trees, but such use would cause serious injury thereto. On January 11, 1933, a plea of guilty to the information was entered om behalf of the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $10. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: United States Department Of Agriculture
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780656862382
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act: Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act, 1666-1690 On May 3, Ti. £6, the United States attorney for the District of Massachusetts, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against Clarence E. Worthen, trustee in a declaration of trust for the American Proprietary Syndicate and trading as the American Drug Sales Co. At Malden, Mass, alleging shipment by said defendant on or about July 29, 1937, from the State of Massachusetts into the State of Maine of a quantity of cre-o-tol, which was a misbranded fungicide within the meaning of the Insecticide Act of 1910. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that the statements, As a Disinfectant Waste Pipes, Garbage Can, kitchen-sink and Tubs Teaspoonful to quart of water Scrubbing and Cleansing, Sprinkling Cellar. Tablespoonful to pail of water. In the Sick Room. Teaspoonful to a quart of water. Wash clothing, vessels, linen, floors, and woodwork, borne on the bottle label, were false and misleading and by reason of the said statements the article was labeled so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser in that they represented that the article would disinfect waste pipes, could be relied upon to disinfect the cellar when used as directed, and would be an effective disinfectant for garbage cans, kitchen sinks and tubs, for the sickroom, on clothing, vessels, linens, floors. And woodwork, when used at the dilutions recommended; whereas it would not be effective for the said purposes when used as directed at the dilutions recommended. The article was alleged to be misbranded further in that it consisted partially of an inert substance, namely, water, which substance does not prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate insects or fungi (bacteria) and the name and percentage amount of the said inert substance were not stated plainly and correctly on the label affixed to the bottle containing the article; nor in lieu thereof were the name and percentage amount of each substance or ingredient of the article having fungicidal (bactericidal) properties, and the total percentage of the inert substance present therein stated plainly and correctly on the bottle label. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: U. S. Food and Drug Administration
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780364965788
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act: Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act; 1691-1710 On June 21, 1939, no claimant having appeared, judgment of condemnation was entered and the product was ordered destroyed. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: U. S. Food and Drug Administration
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780428108441
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act), 1636-1655 On April 30, 1935, the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 117 cans of Nourse Gall Remedy at Seattle, Wash.; alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about November 23, 1934, from Kansas City, Mo., by Nourse Oil Co.; and charging misbranding in violation of the Insecticide Act of 1910. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that the statement appearing on a leaflet shipped with it, Mange t Mange on Live Stock, Dogs and Household Pets are greatly benefited by its use, was false and misleading and tended to deceive and mislead the purchaser since the product was not an effective treatment for all varieties of mange which infest livestock, dogs, and household pets. The article also was alleged to be misbranded in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as reported in notice of judgment No. 29019 published under that act. On April 4, 1938, no answer to the libel having been filed, judgment of condemnation was entered and the product was ordered destroyed. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: U. S. Food and Drug Administration
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780260686305
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act): 1491-1525 On March 2 1936, a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant, and the court imposed a fine of $100. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: United States Department Of Agriculture
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780331398410
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act), 1451-1490 On January a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant 'company, and the court imposed a fine of $75. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: Insecticide and Fungicide Board
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780266710912
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act: Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act, 1101-1125 On May 29, 1926, the defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the information and the court imposed a fine of $10. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: U. S. Agricultural Marketing Service
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780365044772
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act: Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act, 1746-1762 The quart cans were found to contain less than 1 quart each of this product. The labeling also bore false efficacy claims. On August 14, 1939, the United States attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a 'libel praying seizure and condemnation at Scranton, Pa., of 36dozen pint cans and 12 dozen quart cans of an article known as d-stroy, alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about March 27, 1939, by the Ultra Chemical Works Inc, from Paterson, N. J and charging misbranding in violation of the Insecticide Act of 1910. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: U. S. Insecticide and Fungicide Board
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780428876845
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act (Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act) 1551-1575 This product was represented to be derris, which contained a minimum of 5 percent of rotenone, but which in fact consisted of cube root containing less than 5 percent of rotenone. On March 24, 1937, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against R. J. Prentiss Co., Inc., New York, N. Y., alleging shipment by said company on or about July 23, 1935, from the State of New York into the State of Delaware of a quantity of derris, which was an adulterated and misbranded insecticide other than paris green and lead arsenate within the meaning of the Insecticide Act of 1910. The article was alleged to be adulterated in that the statement Derris borne on the barrels containing it represented that the said barrels contained derris; whereas they did not contain derris but another substance, cube root, had been substituted for derris. Adulteration was alleged for the further reason that the strength and purity of the article fell below the professed standard and quality under which it was sold, since it was represented to contain a minimum of 5 percent of rotenone; whereas it contained rotenone in a proportion much less than 5 percent. It was alleged to be misbranded in that the statements Derris Min. Rotenone, borne on the barrels containing it, were false and misleading and by reason of the said statements the article was labeled and branded so asto deceive and mislead purchasers since the barrels did not contain derris but did contain another substance, namely, cube root; and the article did not contain 5 percent of rotenone but did contain much less than 5 percent of rotenone. On May 10, 1937, a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant and the court imposed a fine of $100. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Author: Usda Food and Drug Administration
Publisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9781391990156
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
Excerpt from Notices of Judgment Under the Insecticide Act: Given Pursuant to Section 4 of the Insecticide Act; Nos. 1176-1190; October 1930 Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the above-quoted statements borne on the label were false and misleading, and by reason of the said state ments the article was labeled and branded so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, in that they represented that the article contained nicotine in the proportion of not less than per cent. And contained inert ingredients in the proportion of not more than 97 25 per cent; whereas the article contained less than per cent of nicotine and more than per cent of inert ingredients. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
