National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994. Report of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, on H.R. 2401 Together with Additional and Dissenting Views (including Cost Estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). July 30, 1993. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and Ordered to be Printed PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994. Report of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, on H.R. 2401 Together with Additional and Dissenting Views (including Cost Estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). July 30, 1993. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and Ordered to be Printed PDF full book. Access full book title National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994. Report of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, on H.R. 2401 Together with Additional and Dissenting Views (including Cost Estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). July 30, 1993. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and Ordered to be Printed by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 762
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 762
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative hearings
Languages : en
Pages : 1102
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1194
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1192
Get Book Here
Book Description
February issue includes Appendix entitled Directory of United States Government periodicals and subscription publications; September issue includes List of depository libraries; June and December issues include semiannual index
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Research and Technology Subcommittee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 264
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Military Personnel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 184
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: William Holmes Brown
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 1036
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Impeachments
Languages : en
Pages : 452
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: William J. Krouse
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437941257
Category : Firearms
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Get Book Here
Book Description
Congress has continued to debate the efficacy and constitutionality of federal regulation of firearms and ammunition, with strong advocates arguing for and against greater gun control. While several dozen gun control-related proposals have been introduced in recent Congresses, only a handful of those bills received significant legislative action. The 109th Congress, for example, passed two bills with firearmsrelated provisions that were enacted into law. P.L. 109-72 prohibits certain types of lawsuits against firearm manufacturers and dealers to recover damages related to the criminal or unlawful use of their products by other persons, and P.L. 109-295 includes a provision that prohibits federal officials from seizing any firearm from private persons during a major disaster or emergency, if possession of that firearm was not already prohibited under federal or state law. Nevertheless, the 110th Congress could possibly reconsider several gun control proposals that were considered as part of appropriations and crime legislation in the previous Congress. During the 109th Congress, the House amended the Children's Safety Act of 2005 (H.R. 3132) to prohibit the transfer or possession of a firearm to or by any person convicted of a sex offense against a minor. The House also amended Secure Access to Justice and Court Protection Act of 2005 (H.R. 1751) to authorize certain federal court judges and officials to carry firearms for personal protection. The Senate passed a different version of H.R. 1751 that included similar provisions, as well as provisions designed to clarify and expand the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (P.L. 108-277) -- a law that gives concealed carry privileges to qualified on-duty and retired law enforcement officers. None of those provisions were enacted into law, however. In addition, the House Judiciary considered four gun-related bills: the ATFE Modernization and Reform Act of 2006 (H.R. 5092), the Firearms Corrections and Improvement Act (H.R. 5005), the Firearm Commerce Modernization Act (H.R. 1384), and the NICS Improvement Act of 2005 (H.R. 1415). H.R. 5092 was passed by the House. The 109th Congress, moreover, maintained a fee prohibition for Brady background checks and other funding limitations and conditions related to gun enforcement in the FY2006 DOJ appropriations (P.L. 109-108). Those limitations and conditions have been continued into FY2007 under continuing resolutions. They are often referred to as the "Tiahrt amendment," for their sponsor in the FY2004 appropriations cycle, Representative Todd Tiahrt. Issues addressed in those bills, as well as the Tiahrt funding limitations and conditions, could be reconsidered in the 110th Congress. Senator Charles Schumer, for example, has introduced a bill (S. 77) that would repeal portions of the Tiahrt amendment that limit the sharing of firearm trace data. Other gun control-related issues that may reemerge in the 110th Congress include (1) retaining Brady background check records for approved transactions to enhance terrorist screening, (2) more strictly regulating certain long-range fifty caliber rifles, (3) further regulating certain firearms previously defined in statute as "assault weapons," and (4) requiring background checks for firearm transfers at gun shows. This report will updated to reflect legislative action.
Author: Ronald O'Rourke
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781688018983
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Get Book Here
Book Description
World events in recent years have led observers, particularly since late 2013, to conclude that the international security environment in recent years has undergone a shift from the post-Cold War era that began in the late 1980s and early 1990s, also sometimes known as the unipolar moment (with the United States as the unipolar power), to a new and different situation that features, among other things, renewed great power competition with China and Russia and challenges by these two countries and others to elements of the U.S.-led international order that has operated since World War II. The shift to renewed great power competition has become a major factor in the debate over future U.S. defense spending levels, and has led to new or renewed emphasis on the following in discussions of U.S. defense strategy, plans, and programs: * grand strategy and geopolitics as part of the context for discussing U.S. defense budgets, plans, and programs; * nuclear weapons and nuclear deterrence;* new U.S. military service operational concepts;* U.S. and NATO military capabilities in Europe;* capabilities for conducting so-called high-end conventional warfare (i.e., largescale, high-intensity, technologically sophisticated warfare) against countries such as China and Russia; * maintaining U.S. technological superiority in conventional weapons;* speed of weapon system development and deployment as a measure of merit in defense acquisition policy;* mobilization capabilities for an extended-length large-scale conflict against an adversary such as China or Russia;* minimizing reliance in U.S. military systems on components and materials from Russia and China; and* capabilities for countering so-called hybrid warfare and gray-zone tactics employed by countries such as Russia and China.
