Massachusetts V. U.S. EPA, Part II PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Massachusetts V. U.S. EPA, Part II PDF full book. Access full book title Massachusetts V. U.S. EPA, Part II by United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 166
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 166
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781978172425
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 162
Get Book Here
Book Description
Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA, part II: implications of the Supreme Court decision : hearing before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, second session, March 13, 2008.
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781983584923
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Get Book Here
Book Description
Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA : implications of the Supreme Court decision : hearing before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, June 8, 2007.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Richard J. Lazarus
Publisher: Belknap Press
ISBN: 0674238125
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 369
Get Book Here
Book Description
A renowned Supreme Court advocate tells the inside story of Massachusetts v. EPA, the landmark case that made it possible for the EPA to regulate greenhouse gasses--from the Bush administration's fierce opposition, to the internecine conflicts among the petitioners, to the razor-thin 5-4 victory.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States House of Representatives
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781694691460
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA: implications of the Supreme Court decision: hearing before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, June 8, 2007.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 738
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kathryn A. Watts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 17
Get Book Here
Book Description
In this essay, we consider the long-term legal significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, concluding that the case is likely to have a significant impact on two doctrinal areas of the law: (1) the standing of states; and (2) the standard of review applied to denials of petitions for rulemaking. First, although we have some questions about the Court's reasoning, we are encouraged to see the beginning of a framework for evaluating state standing based on the interest of the state in the litigation. Second, with respect to judicial review of agency inaction in the rulemaking context, the Court's decision breaks new ground by not only confirming the reviewability of an agency's denial of a rulemaking petition but also by closely scrutinizing the reasons that the EPA offered for its decision to decline to regulate. We argue that when added together, these two doctrinal developments result in an interesting mix. States are left in a relatively powerful position vis-agrave;-vis federal agencies in terms of their ability both to file suits against agencies and to seek fairly exacting judicial review of the agency's reasons for declining to regulate. Although a twist on common perceptions about this case, fans of states' rights ought to be quite pleased.
