Immigration Consequences of a Criminal Conviction in North Carolina PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Immigration Consequences of a Criminal Conviction in North Carolina PDF full book. Access full book title Immigration Consequences of a Criminal Conviction in North Carolina by John Rubin. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: John Rubin
Publisher: Unc School of Government
ISBN: 9781560119128
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Rubin
Publisher: Unc School of Government
ISBN: 9781560119128
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 180
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mary E. Kramer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michael Crowell
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781560110156
Category : Ex-convicts
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Get Book Here
Book Description
This publication lists the sanctions other than fine and imprisonment that may be imposed on a person convicted of a crime in North Carolina.
Author: Alina Das
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
For over a century, immigrants have faced adverse immigration consequences if convicted of certain types of offenses in criminal court. Many types of criminal convictions carry severe immigration penalties, including deportation, detention, and the denial of status like asylum or U.S. citizenship. The Supreme Court recently recognized that these penalties are so intimately tied to criminal court adjudications that criminal defense attorneys have a duty to advise noncitizen defendants of the immigration consequences of their guilty pleas in criminal court. Yet there is little clarity as to how one determines whether a particular conviction triggers an immigration penalty. Historically, courts have applied a categorical analysis for assessing the immigration consequences of a criminal conviction. Under a categorical analysis, an immigration official determines the penalties based on an assessment of the statutory definition of the offense, not the factual circumstances of the crime. However, recent Supreme Court, federal court, and agency decisions have ignored this longstanding analysis and have instead examined these issues through the lens of Taylor v. United States, a criminal sentencing case that adopts a categorical analysis in a different context. Distinguishing Taylor and its criminal sentencing rationales, recent decisions have invented a new approach for how past criminal convictions are assessed in the immigration context that now permits a circumstance-specific inquiry into facts beyond the criminal court's findings in some immigration cases. Under these recent decisions, the immigration consequences of a criminal conviction no longer turn on the criminal court adjudication alone, but may also account for facts that were not proven or pleaded in the criminal court proceeding. This article argues that this shift in analysis is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the origins of categorical analysis in immigration law and its independent rationales, including its promotion of notice and an opportunity to be heard, uniformity, predictability, efficiency, and judicial review in the administrative agency context. The article further argues that, because of the flaw in the current debate, courts have failed to consider the negative impact that the erosion of categorical analysis has on the functioning of the current immigration and criminal justice systems. The rationales meriting categorical analysis apply with even greater force today than they did when categorical analysis was first articulated nearly a century ago.
Author: Maricopa County (Ariz.). Office of the Public Defender
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actions and defenses
Languages : en
Pages : 75
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Norton Tooby
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alien criminals
Languages : en
Pages : 215
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Erin O'Neil-Baker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alien criminals
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ann Benson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Attorney and client
Languages : en
Pages : 33
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jenelle Renee Williams
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aliens
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Get Book Here
Book Description
Under U.S. immigration law, non-citizens with criminal convictions may be subject to removal from the country. One basis for removal is a conviction for an aggravated felony. The term "aggravated felony" conjures up images of particularly heinous crimes, and historically this term was applied only to serious felonies, but under current interpretations of the law, the term has been read expansively to include crimes that are neither felonies nor aggravated. In fact, even misdemeanor convictions for which the person has served no jail time may serve as a basis for one's removal from the United States. On the particular issue of a conviction in Virginia of misdemeanor assault and battery, federal courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") have not come to a final conclusion on whether it is an aggravated felony. Although it has not published decisions to serve as precedent on the issue, the BIA has issued a handful of unpublished decisions ruling in both directions. Some of the opinions indicate that Virginia Code Section 18.2-57.2 is a crime of violence, and therefore an aggravated felony. Others say it is not a crime of violence; leaving non-citizens in the dark on a legal issue of fundamental importance in their lives. Part II of this thesis examines the legislative history of the aggravated felony provision, through its various amendments, illustrating the drastic expansion of the provision despite limited debate or discussion of its implications. Part III discusses the state of the aggravated felony provision today. Part IV presents the practical results of the overly broad provision being enforced through the courts, with a particular focus on the example of Virginia misdemeanor convictions for assault and battery. Part V considers the approach courts have taken regarding misdemeanor assault and battery convictions as crimes of violence and contends that they should not be construed as such. This paper concludes that the BIA should publish a decision to serve as precedent on the issue and proposes how Congress can take appropriate action.
Author: Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Immigration and Nationality Law Committee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal law
Languages : en
Pages : 86
Get Book Here
Book Description
