Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 5 - March 2017 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 5 - March 2017 PDF full book. Access full book title Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 5 - March 2017 by Harvard Law Review. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 161027783X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 241
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 161027783X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 241
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277759
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 330
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610278941
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 498
Get Book
Book Description
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked notes, and proper ebook formatting. The contents of Issue 5 include: Article, "Multistage Adjudication," by Louis Kaplow Book Review, "Humanizing the Criminal Justice Machine: Re-Animated Justice or Frankenstein's Monster?" by Nicola Lacey Note, "Importing a Trade or Business Limitation into sec. 2036: Toward a Regulatory Solution to FLP-Driven Transfer Tax Avoidance" Note, "The Benefits of Unequal Protection" Note, "Diagnostic Method Patents and Harms to Follow-On Innovation" Note, "Three Formulations of the Nexus Requirement in Reasonable Accommodations Law" In addition, student research explores Recent Cases on the intersection of age discrimination claims and sec. 1983 claims, the First Amendment implications of restricting airline ads and of compelled speech in suicide advisories, whether transactions in unlisted securities are "domestic," whether employee misuse of computers violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and prudential standing in environmental cases. Finally, the issue includes a Recent Book essay and several book notes of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2000 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This issue of the Review is March 2013, the fifth issue of academic year 2012-2013 (Volume 126).
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277880
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 210
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277791
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 289
Get Book
Book Description
Contents of Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 8 - June 2017 include: * Article, "The Judicial Presumption of Police Expertise," by Anna Lvovsky * Essay, "The Debate That Never Was," by Nicos Stavropoulos * Essay, "Hart's Posthumous Reply," by Ronald Dworkin * Book Review, "Cooperative and Uncooperative Foreign Affairs Federalism," by Jean Galbraith * Note, "Rethinking Actual Causation in Tort Law" * Note, "The Justiciability of Servicemember Suits" * Note, "The Substantive Waiver Doctrine in Employment Arbitration Law" Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on: requiring proof of administrative feasibility to satisfy class action Rule 23; whether prison gerrymandering violates the Equal Protection Clause; justiciability of suit against the government for military sexual assaults; whether criminal procedure requires retroactive application of Hurst v. Florida to pre-Ring cases; whether statutory interpretation's rule of lenity requires fixing cocaine possession penalties by total drug weight; and, in international law, the UN's Security Council asserting Israel's settlement activities to be illegal. Finally, the issue includes several summaries of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2300 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the final issue of academic year 2016-2017.
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 161027833X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 274
Get Book
Book Description
The Harvard Law Review, March 2015, is offered in a digital edition. Contents include: • Article, "Creating Around Copyright," Joseph P. Fishman • Book Review, "Growing Up Outside the Law," Stephen Lee • Book Review, "Property Is the New Privacy: The Coming Constitutional Revolution," Suzanna Sherry • Note, "Working Together for an Independent Expenditure: Candidate Assistance with Super PAC Fundraising" In addition, the issue features student commentary on Recent Cases and policy positions, including such subjects as: defining 'government instrumentality' under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, invalidation of New York soda-portion cap, whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission lacks jurisdiction over rates for nonconsumption of energy, standard of review for compelled disclosures under commercial speech doctrine, Alien Tort Statute claims against an Abu Ghraib contractor, preemption of local zoning ordinances banning hydrofracking, and the Department of Justice's new presumption of electronically recording custodial interviews. Finally, the issue features several summaries of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This issue of the Review is March 2015, the fifth issue of academic year 2014-2015 (Volume 128). The digital edition features active Contents, linked notes, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277708
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 228
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277856
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 230
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Harvard Law Review
Publisher: Quid Pro Books
ISBN: 1610277848
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Jennifer E. Rothman
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 0674986350
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 236
Get Book
Book Description
Who controls how one’s identity is used by others? This legal question, centuries old, demands greater scrutiny in the Internet age. Jennifer Rothman uses the right of publicity—a little-known law, often wielded by celebrities—to answer that question, not just for the famous but for everyone. In challenging the conventional story of the right of publicity’s emergence, development, and justifications, Rothman shows how it transformed people into intellectual property, leading to a bizarre world in which you can lose ownership of your own identity. This shift and the right’s subsequent expansion undermine individual liberty and privacy, restrict free speech, and suppress artistic works. The Right of Publicity traces the right’s origins back to the emergence of the right of privacy in the late 1800s. The central impetus for the adoption of privacy laws was to protect people from “wrongful publicity.” This privacy-based protection was not limited to anonymous private citizens but applied to famous actors, athletes, and politicians. Beginning in the 1950s, the right transformed into a fully transferable intellectual property right, generating a host of legal disputes, from control of dead celebrities like Prince, to the use of student athletes’ images by the NCAA, to lawsuits by users of Facebook and victims of revenge porn. The right of publicity has lost its way. Rothman proposes returning the right to its origins and in the process reclaiming privacy for a public world.
