Germany's equality of rights as legal problem : paper read at the first plenary meeting of the Academy of German Law on November 5, 1933 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Germany's equality of rights as legal problem : paper read at the first plenary meeting of the Academy of German Law on November 5, 1933 PDF full book. Access full book title Germany's equality of rights as legal problem : paper read at the first plenary meeting of the Academy of German Law on November 5, 1933 by Viktor Bruns. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Viktor Bruns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Viktor Bruns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Viktor Bruns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Germany
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Viktor Bruns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Germany
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Viktor Bruns
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : de
Pages : 32
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kaan Akkanat
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
ISBN: 3656899959
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 27
Get Book Here
Book Description
Essay from the year 2014 in the subject Law - Public Law / Constitutional Law / Basic Rights, grade: 1.00, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, course: Introduction to Law, language: English, abstract: This section of our analysis will be devoted to the cross comparison of Turkish, German and Chinese constitutions’ coverage and interpretations of the equality and participation rights. Following the similar methodological line with the “Freedom of Speech and Expression” and “Division of Power” sections, this section will first provide an understanding of where and how these selected countries stand on the parameters of equality and participation rights. The focus of our discussion will then shift to our trilateral constitutional comparison and how they differ from each other in terms of wording, sequence and the emphasis. The drawn ‘picture’ of equality and participation rights will then be framed by taking advantage of well-known court cases from these countries. After the court-case application phase, the section will consequently exhibit the findings related to the trilateral comparison. Equality and participation rights are two particular concepts which are applicable to various dimensions of social sciences. Having law as our natural focus, the discussion about the equality will mainly focus on equality before law. In his “Critique of the Gotha Program”, Karl Marx defines this focus with following words; “Equality before the law is a basic right in the constitutions of democratic countries, and its content appears in all conventions on human rights”(Marx, 1875). In terms of equality, the gender and minority equality/inequality will be the main points of concern. Along with this, the importance of political participation rights will also be stretched throughout the section. As Fabienne Peter suggests, there is a tendency to exclude political participation rights from the minimal lists of human rights as it does not necessarily affect the survival or some basic life functions (Peter, 2013). Peter opposes to this general tendency “I shall argue that the right to political participation, understood as distinct from a right to democracy, should have a place even on minimalist lists” (Peter, 2013). Parallel to Peter’s insistence on necessity of being sharp about the rights for political participation, our section will majorly focus on the defined parliament compositions, voting and candidacy rights andelectoral threshold enforcements.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789276017783
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The German legal system is a federal, statutory law system. The centre of legal thought and practice is the parliamentary statute (although the practice - as we will see - is far more differentiated and fuzzy). The system is hierarchical: federal law takes precedence over state law, and every law has to be in compliance with the Constitution. Due to the federal system, legislative powers are distributed between the federal and the state (Land) level in Germany. Most legislative powers relating to the key issues addressed by the gender equality directives still rest at the federal level. However, over the years, state competences have increased in relation to the civil service and work in the public sector. Legal and political disputes about gender equality are now often linked to the states' equality and higher education laws. Despite the importance of statutory law, areas of significance in respect of gender equality, such as the multitude of social security schemes or many aspects of working life, are shaped not only by federal and state law, but also by collective and works agreements or the internal regulations of professional organisations with a right to self-regulate. Although internal regulations and collective agreements must comply with constitutional requirements, in the opinion of the author of this report, the level of judicial review concerning questions of gender equality in these areas of law leaves a great deal to be desired. In addition, case law plays an important role and decisions of the higher and federal courts may have great influence and impact. Courts are established at the regional, state and federal level. Labour courts deal with discrimination in the field of employment, except for discrimination within the civil service (which falls under the ambit of the administrative courts). The civil courts decide on claims concerning the provision of goods and services under civil law, while the administrative courts are competent for claims against public authorities. There are also specialised courts for social and tax law. Every court in Germany is obliged to examine whether the laws and regulations it intends to apply are in accordance with the Constitution including the constitutional guarantee of gender equality. It is true that only the Federal Constitutional Court is competent to decide on the constitutionality (and thus, validity) of laws enacted by the Federal Parliament (Bundestag) and therefore, all other courts questioning the constitutionality of parliamentary statutes have to refer to the Federal Constitutional Court for a decision ('special judicial review of statutes' or 'referral').1 In addition to statutes, court decisions in violation of the principle of constitutional equality can also be subject to an annulment by the Federal Constitutional Court. The competence to review and, in some cases, decide upon questions of compatibility with constitutional and EU law offers considerable opportunities for courts to further gender equality and to fight gender discrimination. Every court is competent to refer the question of constitutionality of a parliamentary statute to the Federal Constitutional Court and to review non-parliamentary regulations without referral. Every court is competent to directly apply EU gender equality law, to interpret national law in compliance with the EU directives and to refer questions of compatibility with EU law to the CJEU. Although claimants cannot oblige a national court to refer the case to the Federal Constitutional Court when doubting the constitutionality of national law, the refusal of a referral to the CJEU may be challenged before the Federal Constitutional Court as a violation of the right to due process before the legally competent judge.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789276321842
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
The German legal system is a federal, statutory law system. The centre of legal thought and practice is the parliamentary statute (although the practice - as we will see - is far more differentiated and fuzzy). The system is hierarchical: federal law takes precedence over state law, and every law has to be in compliance with the Constitution. Due to the federal system, legislative powers are distributed between the federal and the state (Land) level in Germany. Most legislative powers relating to the key issues addressed by the gender equality directives still rest at the federal level. However, over the years, state competences have increased in relation to the civil service and work in the public sector. Legal and political disputes about gender equality are now often linked to the states' equality and higher education laws. Despite the importance of statutory law, areas of significance in respect of gender equality, such as the multitude of social security schemes or many aspects of working life, are shaped not only by federal and state law, but also by collective and works agreements or the internal regulations of professional organisations with a right to self-regulate. Although internal regulations and collective agreements must comply with constitutional requirements, in the opinion of the author of this report, the level of judicial review concerning questions of gender equality in these areas of law leaves a great deal to be desired. In addition, case law plays an important role and decisions of the higher and federal courts may have great influence and impact. Courts are established at the regional, state and federal level. Labour courts deal with discrimination in the field of employment, except for discrimination within the civil service (which falls under the ambit of the administrative courts). The civil courts decide on claims concerning the provision of goods and services under civil law, while the administrative courts are competent for claims against public authorities. There are also specialised courts for social and tax law. Every court in Germany is obliged to examine whether the laws and regulations it intends to apply are in accordance with the Constitution including the constitutional guarantee of gender equality. It is true that only the Federal Constitutional Court is competent to decide on the constitutionality (and thus, validity) of laws enacted by the Federal Parliament (Bundestag) and therefore, all other courts questioning the constitutionality of parliamentary statutes have to refer to the Federal Constitutional Court for a decision ('special judicial review of statutes' or 'referral').1 In addition to statutes, court decisions in violation of the principle of constitutional equality can also be subject to an annulment by the Federal Constitutional Court. The competence to review and, in some cases, decide upon questions of compatibility with constitutional and EU law offers considerable opportunities for courts to further gender equality and to fight gender discrimination. Every court is competent to refer the question of constitutionality of a parliamentary statute to the Federal Constitutional Court and to review non-parliamentary regulations without referral. Every court is competent to directly apply EU gender equality law, to interpret national law in compliance with the EU directives and to refer questions of compatibility with EU law to the CJEU. Although claimants cannot oblige a national court to refer the case to the Federal Constitutional Court when doubting the constitutionality of national law, the refusal of a referral to the CJEU may be challenged before the Federal Constitutional Court as a violation of the right to due process before the legally competent judge.
Author: Klaus Bertelsmann
Publisher: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
ISBN: 900463388X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Germany
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 40
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jens Kirchner
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 3642006787
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 348
Get Book Here
Book Description
This publication gives an overview of all key aspects of German labour and employment law as well as adjoining fields. Legal professionals with expert knowledge and many years of experience explain the legal basis of these aspects of German law, point out typical practical problems and suggest solutions to those problems. In addition, examples are given on how to best manage legal pitfalls to minimize risks. This book translates employment and labour law for foreign in-house counsels and human resources managers at international companies and provides a clear understanding of the complex legal regulations in Germany. All three editors of the book, Dr. Jens Kirchner, Pascal R. Kremp and Michael Magotsch, are key legal professionals working at the Frankfurt office of DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services providers in the world (www.dlapiper.com), with national and multinational clients. Their experience includes the management of cross-border restructurings, outsourcing and transfer of undertaking measures, as well as the management of national and multi-jurisdictional merger and acquisitions projects, including post-merger integration processes.
