Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station

Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Feasibility studies
Languages : en
Pages : 324

Get Book Here

Book Description

Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station

Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Feasibility studies
Languages : en
Pages : 324

Get Book Here

Book Description


GAS COOLED PEBBLE BED REACTOR FOR A LARGE CENTRAL STATION. Reactor Design and Feasibility Study

GAS COOLED PEBBLE BED REACTOR FOR A LARGE CENTRAL STATION. Reactor Design and Feasibility Study PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
An optimum economic design for a high temperature, helium cooled, central station reactor power plant of about 400 Mw of electric power was determined. The core consists of a randomly packed bed of unclad graphite spheres, approximately one in. in diameter, impregnated with U233 and thorium such that a conversion ratio of near unity is achieved. The high temperature helium permits steam conditions, at the turbine throttle, of 1000 deg F and 1450 psia. (auth).

Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station

Gas Cooled Pebble Bed Reactor for a Large Central Station PDF Author: A. Schock
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 323

Get Book Here

Book Description


Gas-cooled Reactors

Gas-cooled Reactors PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Gas cooled reactors
Languages : en
Pages : 218

Get Book Here

Book Description


Design and Feasibility Study of a Pebble Bed Reactor-steam Power Plant

Design and Feasibility Study of a Pebble Bed Reactor-steam Power Plant PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Feasibility studies
Languages : en
Pages : 342

Get Book Here

Book Description
Originally issued as S and P 1963A, Parts I and II. This report covers a design and feasibility study of a pebble bed reactor-steam power plant of 125 megawatt electrical output. The reactor design which evolved from this study is a two-region thermal breeder, operating on the uranium-thorium cycle, in which all core structural materials are graphite. Fuel is in the form of unclad spherical elements of graphite, containing fissile and fertile material. The primary loop consists of the reactor plus three steam generators and blowers in parallel. Plant design and system analysis including cost analysis and capital cost summary are given.

The ORNL Gas-cooled Reactor

The ORNL Gas-cooled Reactor PDF Author: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Gas cooled reactors
Languages : en
Pages : 102

Get Book Here

Book Description


Comparative Evaluation of Pebble-bed and Prismatic Fueled High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactors

Comparative Evaluation of Pebble-bed and Prismatic Fueled High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactors PDF Author: Paul R. Kasten
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Gas cooled reactors
Languages : en
Pages : 139

Get Book Here

Book Description
A comparative evaluation has been performed of the HTGR and the Federal Republic of Germany's Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) for potential commercial applications in the US. The evaluation considered two reactor sizes (1000 and 3000 MW(t)) and three process applications (steam cycle, direct cycle, and process heat, with outlet coolant temperatures of 750, 850, and 950°C, respectively). The primary criterion for the comparison was the levelized (15-year) cost of producing electricity or process heat. Emphasis was placed on the cost impact of differences between the prismatic-type HTGR core, which requires periodic refuelings during reactor shutdowns, and the pebble bed PBR core, which is refueled continuously during reactor operations. Detailed studies of key technical issues using reference HTGR and PBR designs revealed that two cost components contributing to the levelized power costs are higher for the PBR: capital costs and operation and maintenance costs. A third cost component, associated with nonavailability penalties, tended to be higher for the PBR except for the process heat application, for which there is a large uncertainty in the HTGR nonavailability penalty at the 950°C outlet coolant temperature. A fourth cost component, fuel cycle costs, is lower for the PBR, but not sufficiently lower to offset the capital cost component. Thus the HTGR appears to be slightly superior to the PBR in economic performance. Because of the advanced development of the HTGR concept, large HTGRs could also be commercialized in the US with lower R and D costs and shorter lead times than could large PBRs. It is recommended that the US gas-cooled thermal reactor program continue giving primary support to the HTGR, while also maintaining its cooperative PBR program with FRG.

Civilian Power Reactor Program

Civilian Power Reactor Program PDF Author: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nuclear reactors
Languages : en
Pages : 96

Get Book Here

Book Description


Advances in High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Fuel Technology

Advances in High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor Fuel Technology PDF Author: International Atomic Energy Agency
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789201253101
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 639

Get Book Here

Book Description
This publication reports on the results of a coordinated research project on advances in high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) fuel technology and describes the findings of research activities on coated particle developments. These comprise two specific benchmark exercises with the application of HTGR fuel performance and fission product release codes, which helped compare the quality and validity of the computer models against experimental data. The project participants also examined techniques for fuel characterization and advanced quality assessment/quality control. The key exercise included a round-robin experimental study on the measurements of fuel kernel and particle coating properties of recent Korean, South African and US coated particle productions applying the respective qualification measures of each participating Member State. The summary report documents the results and conclusions achieved by the project and underlines the added value to contemporary knowledge on HTGR fuel.

Comparative Evaluation of Pebble-bed and Prismatic Fueled High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactors

Comparative Evaluation of Pebble-bed and Prismatic Fueled High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactors PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
A comparative evaluation has been performed of the HTGR and the Federal Republic of Germany's Pebble Bed Reactor (PBR) for potential commercial applications in the US. The evaluation considered two reactor sizes (1000 and 3000 MW(t)) and three process applications (steam cycle, direct cycle, and process heat, with outlet coolant temperatures of 750, 850, and 950°C, respectively). The primary criterion for the comparison was the levelized (15-year) cost of producing electricity or process heat. Emphasis was placed on the cost impact of differences between the prismatic-type HTGR core, which requires periodic refuelings during reactor shutdowns, and the pebble bed PBR core, which is refueled continuously during reactor operations. Detailed studies of key technical issues using reference HTGR and PBR designs revealed that two cost components contributing to the levelized power costs are higher for the PBR: capital costs and operation and maintenance costs. A third cost component, associated with nonavailability penalties, tended to be higher for the PBR except for the process heat application, for which there is a large uncertainty in the HTGR nonavailability penalty at the 950°C outlet coolant temperature. A fourth cost component, fuel cycle costs, is lower for the PBR, but not sufficiently lower to offset the capital cost component. Thus the HTGR appears to be slightly superior to the PBR in economic performance. Because of the advanced development of the HTGR concept, large HTGRs could also be commercialized in the US with lower R and D costs and shorter lead times than could large PBRs. It is recommended that the US gas-cooled thermal reactor program continue giving primary support to the HTGR, while also maintaining its cooperative PBR program with FRG.