Federal Agency Compliance with Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Federal Agency Compliance with Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act PDF full book. Access full book title Federal Agency Compliance with Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 196
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 196
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative law
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 148
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289130732
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO updated its previous reports on agencies' use of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions to publish final rule notices, focusing on: (1) how many agencies had no Agenda entries that were characterized as Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980, section 610 reviews, whether agencies are interpreting the review requirements consistently, and why certain agencies that appeared subject to the requirements had no entries; (2) how many of the section 610 review entries in these Agendas appeared to meet the notification requirements in subsection 610(c); (3) if the section 610 review entries did not appear to meet the statutory requirements, why certain agencies' entries were characterized as section 610 reviews; and (4) whether any federal agencies had revised their section 610 review plans.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Small Business
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Lane Jarvis
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers
ISBN: 9781629481951
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Independent federal agencies are subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). Because they fall outside of presidential authority, however, independent agencies are not subject either to executive orders concerning regulatory impact analysis or to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review of analysis. The absence of such guidance and oversight, characteristics of populations of entities regulated by independent agencies, and potentially differing adaptations or interpretations of regulatory flexibility raise questions about the degree and nature of their compliance with the RFA. This book characterises and assesses RFA compliance of independent federal agencies. As a group, independent federal agencies do less rigorous regulatory flexibility analysis than executive-branch agencies. The independent agencies rarely ever perform quantitative analysis of costs and impacts. Differences among the practices of most independent agencies that regulate small businesses, by comparison, were only differences of degree.
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative regulation drafting
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428934049
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
As part of a broader regulatory reform agenda, some interest groups have suggested that Congress require agencies to reexamine their existing regulations to determine whether they are still needed or can be made less burdensome. One model that has been suggested for such regulatory "lookbacks" is an expansion of a requirement in Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980. That provision requires each agency to develop a plan for the review of its existing rules that have or will have a "significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities." Agencies are required to review any new rules within 10 years of their publication as a final rule, and to provide an annual Federal Register notice of rules they have designated for review within the next 12 months. The Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions is intended to be a compendium of agency rulemaking actions within the next 12 months. Therefore, the number of Section 610 notices in the Unified Agenda should provide some indication of the extent to which agencies are conducting the required "lookbacks" under the RFA. Although this statutory "lookback" requirement has been in place since 1981, it difficult to determine with any degree of certainty whether agencies are consistently implementing it. However, it appears that agencies are carrying out relatively few Section 610 reviews. Several agencies have consistently indicated that they plan to issue dozens of rules each year with a significant impact on small entities, but have published few if any notices of Section 610 reviews in the Unified Agenda. The RFA gives agencies a significant amount of discretion to decide which rules are covered by the review requirement. There also appears to be substantial confusion or disagreement among the agencies regarding what Section 610 requires, thereby limiting its effectiveness. For example, some agencies said the statutes underlying their rules had a significant impact on small entities, not the rules themselves, so they did not have to review them under Section 610. The poor implementation history of Section 610 of the RFA offers a number of valuable lessons for current advocates of even broader "lookback" reviews. For any such process to work, Congress faces the challenge of clearly specifying what rules should be reviewed and how the reviews should be conducted. Also, some means of tracking the reviews, congressional or executive branch oversight, and a meaningful enforcement mechanism appear important to improving the implementation of the lookback requirement. Otherwise, agencies are unlikely to conduct many more reviews than have occurred pursuant to Section 610. Legislation has been introduced in the 109th Congress (H.R. 682) that addresses some of the issues regarding the implementation of the RFA and Section 610 reviews. This report will be updated when additional information about Section 610 or broader lookback reviews become available.
