Evolution of the Judicial Opinion

Evolution of the Judicial Opinion PDF Author: William D. Popkin
Publisher: NYU Press
ISBN: 0814767265
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 310

Get Book Here

Book Description
Publisher Description

Evolution of the Judicial Opinion

Evolution of the Judicial Opinion PDF Author: William D. Popkin
Publisher: NYU Press
ISBN: 0814767265
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 310

Get Book Here

Book Description
Publisher Description

The Evolution of the Judicial Opinion

The Evolution of the Judicial Opinion PDF Author: Emlin McClain
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Stare decisis
Languages : en
Pages : 34

Get Book Here

Book Description


Evolution of the Judicial Opinion

Evolution of the Judicial Opinion PDF Author: William D. Popkin
Publisher: NYU Press
ISBN: 0814767494
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 311

Get Book Here

Book Description
In this sweeping study of the judicial opinion, William D. Popkin examines how judges' opinions have been presented from the early American Republic to the present. Throughout history, he maintains, judges have presented their opinions within political contexts that involve projecting judicial authority to the external public, yet within a professional legal culture that requires opinions to develop judicial law through particular institutional and individual judicial styles. Tracing the history of judicial opinion from its roots in English common law, Popkin documents a general shift from unofficially reported oral opinions, to semi-official reports, to the U.S. Supreme Court's adoption in the early nineteenth century of generally unanimous opinions. While this institutional base was firmly established by the twentieth century, Popkin suggests that the modern U.S. judicial opinion has reverted—in some respects—to one in which each judge expresses an individual point of view. Ultimately, he concludes that a shift from an authoritative to a more personal and exploratory individual style of writing opinions is consistent with a more democratic judicial institution.

The Evolution of Judicial Opinion with Respect to the Admissibility If Scientific Evidence

The Evolution of Judicial Opinion with Respect to the Admissibility If Scientific Evidence PDF Author: Jolly Bugarin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Criminal procedure
Languages : en
Pages : 160

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Evolution of a Judicial Philosophy

The Evolution of a Judicial Philosophy PDF Author: John Marshall Harlan
Publisher: Cambridge : Harvard University Press
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 352

Get Book Here

Book Description


Making the Case

Making the Case PDF Author: Paul W. Kahn
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 0300220847
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 256

Get Book Here

Book Description
Writing in the tradition of Karl Llewellyn’s classic The Bramble Bush, Paul Kahn speaks in this book simultaneously to students and scholars. Drawing on thirty years of teaching experience, Kahn introduces students to the deep, narrative structure of the judicial opinion. Learning to read the opinion, the student learns the nature of legal argument. Thus Kahn’s exposition of the opinion simultaneously offers a theory of legal meaning that will be of great interest to scholars of law, humanities, and the social sciences. At the center of Kahn’s approach are ideas of narrative, persuasion, and self-government. His sweeping account of interpretation in law offers innovative views of the nature of authorship, the development and decline of doctrine, and the construction of facts.

The Evolution of a Judicial Philosophy

The Evolution of a Judicial Philosophy PDF Author: John M. Harlan
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780608101088
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 341

Get Book Here

Book Description


In the Opinion of the Court

In the Opinion of the Court PDF Author: William Domnarski
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
ISBN: 9780252065569
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 204

Get Book Here

Book Description
In the Opinion of the Court, the first close examination of judicial opinions as a literary genre, looks at opinions handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals, and district courts, tracing their history, function, and place in legal literature. William Domnarski explores the connection between judges and their audience on the one hand, and judicial opinions and their functions, on the other. He also reveals the key roles played by the reporting and publication of judicial opinions in advancing distinctly American values, the dominance exercised by the best opinion writers, and the rise of the law clerk as an individual increasingly called on to write opinions. Domnarski pays special attention to Learned Hand and Oliver Wendell Holmes traditionally seen as the best practitioners of the genre, and devotes a chapter to Richard Posner, Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago, seen as carrying on the Hand-Holmes tradition.

The Rise of Modern Judicial Review

The Rise of Modern Judicial Review PDF Author: Christopher Wolfe
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
ISBN: 1461645468
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 463

Get Book Here

Book Description
This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books.

The Doctrine of Judicial Review

The Doctrine of Judicial Review PDF Author: Edward S. Corwin
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1351483498
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 173

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book, first published in 1914, contains five historical essays. Three of them are on the concept of judicial review, which is defined as the power of a court to review and invalidate unlawful acts by the legislative and executive branches of government. One chapter addresses the historical controversy over states' rights. Another concerns the Pelatiah Webster Myth the notion that the US Constitution was the work of a single person.In "Marbury v. Madison and the Doctrine of Judicial Review," Edward S. Corwin analyzes the legal source of the power of the Supreme Court to review acts of Congress. "We, the People" examines the rights of states in relation to secession and nullification. "The Pelatiah Webster Myth" demolishes Hannis Taylor's thesis that Webster was the "secret" author of the constitution. "The Dred Scott Decision" considers Chief Justice Taney's argument concerning Scott's title to citizenship under the Constitution. "Some Possibilities in the Way of Treaty-Making" discusses how the US Constitution relates to international treaties.Matthew J. Franck's new introduction to this centennial edition situates Corwin's career in the history of judicial review both as a concept and as a political reality.