Effects of Various Frequencies of Supplementation and Urea Inclusion in Protein Supplements on Low-quality Forage Use, Ruminal Metabolism, and Performance of Beef Cattle PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Effects of Various Frequencies of Supplementation and Urea Inclusion in Protein Supplements on Low-quality Forage Use, Ruminal Metabolism, and Performance of Beef Cattle PDF full book. Access full book title Effects of Various Frequencies of Supplementation and Urea Inclusion in Protein Supplements on Low-quality Forage Use, Ruminal Metabolism, and Performance of Beef Cattle by Chance Garrett Farmer. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Chance Garrett Farmer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 410
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Chance Garrett Farmer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 410
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 812
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Brent Charles Woods
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 246
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jamie Kunkel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
In many pasture and rangeland scenarios, low-quality forages (6-8% CP) are the primary energy source for some portion of the year. At these times, energy is typically the first limiting nutrient to the ruminant. Low-quality forages are generally not limited in availability; however, the high cell wall content and reduced levels of CP prevent ruminants from being able to extract the harvested energy. Without provision of supplemental nutrients, the available energy may be inadequate to meet performance expectations. Protein supplementation during periods of inadequate forage quality has been observed to alleviate ruminal nitrogen deficiencies and increase forage utilization. Increased forage utilization translates into greater energy extraction allowing for increased animal performance. The first trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of utilizing non-protein nitrogen (a slow-release urea compared to urea) on intake and digestion of beef steers consuming low-quality bermudagrass hay. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a low-quality bermudagrass hay (7.3 % CP and were ruminally dosed once daily with either urea or slow-release urea (SRU) at levels to provide 0, 64, 128, or 192 mg of N/kg of initial BW per day. Additionally, steers were supplemented with glycerol at levels of 0 or 0.1% of initial BW per day. Total OMI and forage OMI (FOMI) increased quadratically (P
Author: Eric Arthur Bailey
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Two experiments quantified effects of supplemental protein and energy on forage digestion and urea kinetics in beef cattle. In experiment 1, energy treatments included: control, 600 g glucose dosed ruminally once daily, and 480 g VFA infused ruminally over 8 h daily. Casein was dosed ruminally once daily (120 or 240 g). Cattle (208 kg) had ad libitum access to low-quality hay (5.8% protein). Infusion of VFA decreased forage intake by 27%. Glucose decreased NDF digestibility. Microbial N flow was greater for 240 than for 120 g/d casein, but was not affected by energy. Retained N increased with casein supply. Urea-N entry rate (UER) and gut entry of urea-N (GER) were not affected by energy, casein, or interactions, but GER/UER was less when 240 rather than 120 g/d casein was provided. Compared to VFA, glucose tended to increase GER/UER. Glucose led to more microbial uptake of recycled urea than VFA. In these young calves, changes in N and energy supply did not greatly impact urea kinetics, likely because increased N was largely retained. In experiment 2, treatments included: 0 or 1.2 kg glucose, and 240 or 480 g casein. Cattle (391 kg) were fed low-quality hay (4.7% protein). Glucose reduced forage intake by 18%, whereas casein did not affect it, and depressed fiber digestion. Microbial N flow to the duodenum and retained N increased as casein increased, but neither was affected by glucose. Increasing casein increased UER 50%. Urinary urea-N increased as casein increased; moreover, GER numerically increased 25% as casein increased. GER/UER decreased as casein increased. Glucose decreased urinary urea, but did not change UER or GER. Microbial uptake of recycled urea was least for steers receiving 480 g/d casein with no glucose, reflecting that this treatment exceeded ruminal requirement for N. In these more mature steers, increases in N intake increased UER, reflecting that only small proportions of the increased N intake were retained. Thus, as steer maturity increased, UER and GER increased, likely because less N was retained. These studies demonstrate the influence of urea recycling in meeting N needs of cattle fed low-quality forage.
Author: J. C. Waterlow
Publisher: CABI
ISBN: 1845930843
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 315
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book is concerned with protein metabolism at the physiological, not the molecular level and particularly with studies on human beings. Protein turnover is a vital function, no less important than oxygen turnover, because of this over the last 20 years there has been an increase in the research on protein turnover in man, with parallel work on farm animals. Methods that have been used for measuring whole body protein turnover in man, the underlying problems and assumptions and the problems that have been encountered are discussed in this comprehensive book.
Author: Thomas A. Currier
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Ruminants
Languages : en
Pages : 310
Get Book Here
Book Description
Data is limited evaluating infrequent supplementation of urea or biuret to ruminants consuming low-quality forage (6% crude protein). Therefore, a series of experiments were designed to compare the effects of daily (D) and alternate day (2D) supplementation of two non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources (urea or biuret) to ruminants consuming low-quality forage. Experiment 1 was a N balance study using five wethers in an incomplete 5 x 4 Latin square design (five treatments; four 24-d periods) with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (two sources of NPN and two supplementation frequencies) and an unsupplemented control. Supplements, consisting of urea or biuret mixed with ground soy hulls and dried molasses, were isonitrogenous (approximately 26% crude protein; dry matter basis) and offered D or 2D. The 2D supplemented lambs received double the quantity of supplemental N on their supplementation day compared with D lambs; therefore, all D and 2D treatments received the same amount of supplemental N over a 2-d period. Experiment 2 was a 70-d cow performance study using 80 spring-calving cows during the last third of gestation. Cows were stratified by age, body condition score, and expected calving date, and assigned randomly within stratification to one of the five treatments described in Experiment 1 above. They were then sorted by treatment and randomly assigned to 1 of 20 pens (4 cows/pen, 4 pens/treatment). Experiment 3 was a site of digestion study using five ruminally and duodenally fistulated steers to compare D and 2D supplementation of urea or biuret on forage intake, ruminal fermentation, site and extent of nutrient digestion, and rumen microbial efficiency. Five ruminally and duodenally fistulated steers were used in an incomplete 5 x 4 Latin square design with the same treatments described in Experiment 1. The results for Experiment 1 reported that DM, OM, and N intake, DM, OM, and N digestibility, N balance, and digested N retained were greater (P0.03) for supplemented wethers compared with CON with no difference (P0.05) because of NPN source or SF. Supplemented lambs had increased plasma urea N (PUN) compared with CON (P
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Supplements are often fed to stocker cattle on forage-based diets to improve animal performance. Delivery costs can make up a substantial portion of the cost of supplementation. Reducing supplementation frequency can reduce labor and equipment costs and therefore has the potential to increase profit. However, less frequent feeding requires feeding larger quantities of supplement at once and can increase the likelihood of negative associative effects of supplementation. Additionally, little is understood about the metabolic response of ruminants to large fluxuation in nutrient intake. A 50:50 blend of soyhulls and corn gluten feed is widely used by producers to supplement growing cattle. This blend is high in energy but low in starch. It also contains a moderate amount of protein, much of which is ruminally degradable. The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of reducing supplementation frequency of a soybean hull and corn gluten feed blend on performance, digestion, and concentrations of metabolites and hormonal growth regulators in blood of steers. In Experiment 1, growing steers consuming medium quality fescue hay were supplemented either daily, 3 times a week, or 2 times a week. Hay intake was decreased by reducing supplementation frequency but gains were not affected. As a result, the feed to gain ratio increased slightly with less frequent supplementation. In Experiment 2, six ruminally cannulated steers consuming medium quality fescue hay were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square to determine the effect of supplement frequency (daily at 1% BW or on alternate days at 2% BW) on digestion and ruminal parameters. Reducing supplementation frequency decreased hay intake but did not affect digestibility of the diet. On the day of supplementation molar proportions both of propionate and butyrate in the rumen of steers supplemented on alternate days was increased compared to those supplemented daily. In Experiment 3, growing steers were individually.
Author: Jimmy L. Howard
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 810
Get Book Here
Book Description
The 4th edition of this established text brings a fresh approach to food animal practice. Updated to include information from the most current research and technology, this revised and improved edition is a comprehensive resource that covers all aspects of prevention, therapy, and management of food animal disease. International experts discuss everything from special animal therapy and procedures to dietary management. Over 100 new consulting editors and authors provide a fresh approach and look.
Author: Dustin L. McGuire
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Beef cattle
Languages : en
Pages : 70
Get Book Here
Book Description
Two studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of supplement composition on intake and digestibility of a low-quality (6% CP), cool-season forage, as well as cow performance. Treatments included a non-supplemented control (CON), corn (approximately 8% CP), corn and urea (LU = corn + 0.09 mg/kg BW urea, approximately 27% CP; HU = corn + 0.17 mg/kg BW urea, approximately 43% CP) and a positive control of SBM (approximately 51% CP). In Experiment 1, 5 ruminally cannulated Angus x Hereford steers (560 ± 79 kg of BW) were used in an incomplete 5 x 4 Latin square with four 28-d periods to compare the effects of urea addition to a corn-based supplement on forage intake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation characteristics. Forage intake and digestibility were not influence by supplementation (P 0.10); however, intake was greater for SBM than HU (P = 0.01). Ruminal NH3-N increased with supplementation (P 0.01), increased linearly with urea inclusion (P 0.01) and was greater for HU than SBM (P 0.01), However, ruminal NH3-N for non-supplemented steers was 1.61 mM, within the range believed to support optimal growth of rumen microbes in vivo, suggesting that ruminally available-N was not limiting forage utilization. Total volatile fatty acid concentration was not influenced by supplement composition (P 0.10). In Experiment 2, 80 late gestation (approximately 190 d pregnant) Angus x Hereford cows (507 ± 10 kg) were stratified by age, BCS, and BW and randomly allotted to the treatments described in Experiment 1 (20 pens; 4 cows/pen; 4 pens/treatment). Cow BW and BCS change were improved with supplementation (P
