Defense Procurement: Full Funding Policy - Background, Issues, and Options for Congress. CRS Report for Congress PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Defense Procurement: Full Funding Policy - Background, Issues, and Options for Congress. CRS Report for Congress PDF full book. Access full book title Defense Procurement: Full Funding Policy - Background, Issues, and Options for Congress. CRS Report for Congress by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DoD) by Congress in the 1950s that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. Although technical in nature, the policy relates to Congress' power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DoD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years by Congress, the Government Accountability Office, and DoD. In recent years, some DoD weapons -- specifically, certain Navy ships -- have been procured with funding profiles that do not conform to the policy as it traditionally has been applied to DoD weapon procurement programs. DoD, as part of its FY2005 and FY2006 defense budget submission, proposed procuring ships and aircraft using funding approaches that did not conform to the policy as traditionally applied. DoD's proposals would establish new precedents for procuring other DoD weapons and equipment with nonconforming funding approaches. Such precedents could further circumscribe the full funding policy. This, in turn, could limit and complicate Congress' oversight of DoD procurement programs, or require different approaches to exercise control and oversight. A principal effect of the full funding policy is to prevent the use of incremental funding, under which the cost of a weapon is divided into two or more annual portions. Incremental funding fell out of favor for a variety of reasons. Congress has several options for responding to recent proposals for procuring DoD ships and aircraft with funding mechanisms that do not conform to the full funding policy. These options could have the effect of terminating, modifying, maintaining, or strengthening the full funding policy. The process of weighing options may involve balancing a need to meet DoD procurement goals against the goal of preserving Congress' control over DoD spending.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DoD) by Congress in the 1950s that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. Although technical in nature, the policy relates to Congress' power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DoD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years by Congress, the Government Accountability Office, and DoD. In recent years, some DoD weapons -- specifically, certain Navy ships -- have been procured with funding profiles that do not conform to the policy as it traditionally has been applied to DoD weapon procurement programs. DoD, as part of its FY2005 and FY2006 defense budget submission, proposed procuring ships and aircraft using funding approaches that did not conform to the policy as traditionally applied. DoD's proposals would establish new precedents for procuring other DoD weapons and equipment with nonconforming funding approaches. Such precedents could further circumscribe the full funding policy. This, in turn, could limit and complicate Congress' oversight of DoD procurement programs, or require different approaches to exercise control and oversight. A principal effect of the full funding policy is to prevent the use of incremental funding, under which the cost of a weapon is divided into two or more annual portions. Incremental funding fell out of favor for a variety of reasons. Congress has several options for responding to recent proposals for procuring DoD ships and aircraft with funding mechanisms that do not conform to the full funding policy. These options could have the effect of terminating, modifying, maintaining, or strengthening the full funding policy. The process of weighing options may involve balancing a need to meet DoD procurement goals against the goal of preserving Congress' control over DoD spending.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military weapons
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 71
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DOD) that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. The policy relates to Congress's power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DOD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years. In recent years some DOD weapons have been procured with funding profiles that do not conform to the policy. DOD has proposed procuring ships and aircraft using funding approaches that do not conform to the policy. DOD's proposals would establish new precedents for procuring other DOD weapons and equipment with non-conforming funding approaches. Such precedents could further circumscribe the full funding policy. This, in turn, could limit and complicate Congress's oversight of DOD procurement programs, or require different approaches to exercise control and oversight. A principal effect of the full funding policy is to prevent the use of incremental funding, under which the cost of a weapon is divided into two or more annual portions. Incremental funding could make the total procurement costs of weapons and equipment more difficult for Congress to understand and track, create a potential for DOD to start procurement of an item without necessarily stating its total cost to Congress, permit one Congress to tie the hands of future Congresses, and increase weapon procurement costs by exposing weapons under construction to uneconomic start-up and stop costs. Congress has several options for responding to recent procurement proposals. These options could have the effect of terminating, modifying, maintaining, or strengthening the full funding policy. In weighing these options, Congress may consider several factors, including Congress's power of the purse, ability to conduct oversight of DOD procurement programs, and the potential impact on weapon costs.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military weapons
Languages : en
Pages : 53
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DOD) by Congress in the 1950s that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. Although technical in nature, the policy relates to Congress's power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DOD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years by Congress, the Government Accountability Office, and DOD.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DOD) by Congress in the 1950s that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. Although technical in nature, the policy relates to Congress's power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DOD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years by Congress, the Government Accountability Office, and DOD. In recent years some DOD weapons specifically, certain Navy ships have been procured with funding profiles that do not conform to the policy as it traditionally has been applied to DOD weapon procurement programs. DOD, in recent budget submissions, has proposed procuring ships and aircraft using funding approaches that do not conform to the policy as traditionally applied. DOD s proposals would establish new precedents for procuring other DOD weapons and equipment with non-conforming funding approaches. Such precedents could further circumscribe the full funding policy. This, in turn, could limit and complicate Congress s oversight of DOD procurement programs, or require different approaches to exercise control and oversight. A principal effect of the full funding policy is to prevent the use of incremental funding, under which the cost of a weapon is divided into two or more annual portions. Incremental funding fell out of favor because opponents believed it could make the total procurement costs of weapons and equipment more difficult for Congress to understand and track, create a potential for DOD to start procurement of an item without necessarily stating its total cost to Congress, permit one Congress to tie the hands of future Congresses, and increase weapon procurement costs by exposing weapons under construction to uneconomic start-up and stop costs.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military weapons
Languages : en
Pages : 53
Get Book Here
Book Description
The full funding policy is a federal budgeting rule imposed on the Department of Defense (DOD) by Congress in the 1950s that requires the entire procurement cost of a weapon or piece of military equipment to be funded in the year in which the item is procured. Although technical in nature, the policy relates to Congress's power of the purse and its responsibility for conducting oversight of DOD programs. Support for the policy has been periodically reaffirmed over the years by Congress, the Government Accountability Office, and DOD.
Author: Ronald O'Rourke
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781075833274
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Navy wants to develop and procure three new types of unmanned vehicles (UVs) in FY2020 and beyond-Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles (LUSVs), Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs), and Extra-Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (XLUUVs). The Navy is requesting $628.8 million in FY2020 research and development funding for these three UV programs and their enabling technologies. The Navy wants to acquire these three types of UVs (which this report refers to collectively as large UVs) as part of an effort to shift the Navy to a new fleet architecture (i.e., a new combination of ships and other platforms) that is more widely distributed than the Navy's current architecture. Compared to the current fleet architecture, this more-distributed architecture is to include proportionately fewer large surface combatants (i.e., cruisers and destroyers), proportionately more small surface combatants (i.e., frigates and Littoral Combat Ships), and the addition of significant numbers of large UVs. The Navy wants to employ accelerated acquisition strategies for procuring these large UVs, so as to get them into service more quickly. The emphasis that the Navy placed on UV programs in its FY2020 budget submission and the Navy's desire to employ accelerated acquisition strategies in acquiring these large UVs together can be viewed as an expression of the urgency that the Navy attaches to fielding large UVs for meeting future military challenges from countries such as China. The LUSV program is a proposed new start project for FY2020. The Navy wants to procure two LUSVs per year in FY2020FY2024. The Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on commercial ship designs, with ample capacity for carrying various modular payloads-particularly anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and strike payloads, meaning principally anti-ship and land-attack missiles. The Navy reportedly envisions LUSVs as being 200 feet to 300 feet in length and having a full load displacement of about 2,000 tons. The MUSV program began in FY2019. The Navy plans to award a contract for the first MUSV in FY2019 and wants to award a contract for the second MUSV in FY2023. The Navy wants MUSVs, like LUSVs, to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships that can accommodate various payloads. Initial payloads for MUSVs are to be intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) payloads and electronic warfare (EW) systems. The Navy defines MUSVs as having a length of between 12 meters (about 39 feet) and 50 meters (about 164 feet). The Navy wants to pursue the MUSV program as a rapid prototyping effort under what is known as Section 804 acquisition authority. The XLUUV program, also known as Orca, was established to address a Joint Emergent Operational Need (JEON). The Navy wants to procure nine XLUUVs in FY2020-FY2024. The Navy announced on February 13, 2019, that it had selected Boeing to fabricate, test, and deliver the first four Orca XLUUVs and associated support elements. On March 27, 2019, the Navy announced that the award to Boeing had been expanded to include the fifth Orca. The Navy's large UV programs pose a number of oversight issues for Congress, including issues relating to the analytical basis for the more-distributed fleet architecture; the Navy's accelerated acquisition strategies and funding method for these programs; technical, schedule, and cost risk in the programs; the proposed annual procurement rates for the programs; the industrial base implications of the programs; the personnel implications of the programs; and whether the Navy has accurately priced the work it is proposing to do in FY2020 on the programs.
Author: Nina M. Serafino
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437928064
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Get Book Here
Book Description
Contents: (1) Introduction: Purposes and Goal; Achievements to Date; Funding to Date; (2) Background; (3) Global Peace Operations Initiative (GPOI) Purposes and Activities: GPOI Goals and Needs; Demand for Peacekeepers; Need for Gendarme-Constabulary Forces; U.S. Peacekeeping Training and Assistance in Sub-Saharan Africa; The Transition to GPOI Training and Assistance in Sub-Saharan Africa; Development of a ¿Beyond Africa¿ Program; Western Hemisphere; Asia/South Asia/Pacific Islands; Greater Europe (Europe and Eurasia); Middle East; Foreign Contributions to Peacekeeping Capacity Building; Italian Center of Excellence for Stability Police Units; (4) Administration Funding Requests and Congressional Action, Illus.
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1414
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)
Author: Ronald O'Rourke
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense contracts
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report provides background information and issues for Congress on multiyear procurement (MYP) and block buy contracting (BBC), which are special contracting mechanisms that Congress permits the Department of Defense (DOD) to use for a limited number of defense acquisition programs.
