Current and Prospective Safety Issues at the HFBR. PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Current and Prospective Safety Issues at the HFBR. PDF full book. Access full book title Current and Prospective Safety Issues at the HFBR. by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 6
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Brookhaven High Flux Beam Reactor (HFBR) was designed primarily to produce external neutron beams for experimental research. It is cooled, moderated and reflected by heavy water and uses MTR-ETR type fuel elements containing enriched uranium. The reactor power when operation began in 19965 was 40 MW, was raised to 60 MW in 1982 after a number of plant modifications, and operated at that level until 1989. Since that time safety questions have been raised which resulted in extended shutdowns and a reduction in operating power to 30 MW. This paper will discuss the principle safety issues, plans for their resolution and return to 60 MW operation. In addition, radiation embrittlement of the reactor vessel and thermal shield and its affect on the life of the facility will be briefly discussed.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 6
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Brookhaven High Flux Beam Reactor (HFBR) was designed primarily to produce external neutron beams for experimental research. It is cooled, moderated and reflected by heavy water and uses MTR-ETR type fuel elements containing enriched uranium. The reactor power when operation began in 19965 was 40 MW, was raised to 60 MW in 1982 after a number of plant modifications, and operated at that level until 1989. Since that time safety questions have been raised which resulted in extended shutdowns and a reduction in operating power to 30 MW. This paper will discuss the principle safety issues, plans for their resolution and return to 60 MW operation. In addition, radiation embrittlement of the reactor vessel and thermal shield and its affect on the life of the facility will be briefly discussed.
Author: American Nuclear Society
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nuclear engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 596
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nuclear engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 612
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nuclear energy
Languages : en
Pages : 730
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 634
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science. Subcommittee on Energy and Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 1452
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative law
Languages : en
Pages : 868
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. International Development Agency
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 520
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Power resources
Languages : en
Pages : 484
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309068312
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 90
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Committee on Developing a Federal Materials Facilities Strategy was appointed by the National Research Council (NRC) in response to a request by the federal agencies involved in funding and operating multidisciplinary user facilities for research with synchrotron radiation, neutrons, and high magnetic fields. Starting in August 1996, a series of conversations and meetings was held among NRC staff and officials from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Department of Commerce), and the National Institutes of Health. The agencies were concerned that facilities originally developed to support research in materials science were increasingly used by scientists from other fields-particularly the biological sciences-whose research was supported by agencies other than those responsible for the facilities. This trend, together with the introduction of several new, large user facilities in the last decade, led the agencies to seek advice on the possible need for interagency cooperation in the management of these federal research facilities.
