Author: Malcolm Gordon Britts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 213
Book Description
Comparable Verdicts in Personal Injury Claims
Author: Malcolm Gordon Britts
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 213
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 213
Book Description
Comparable Verdicts in Personal Injury Claims
Author: M. M. G. Britts
Publisher: Lawbook Company
ISBN: 9780455192611
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher: Lawbook Company
ISBN: 9780455192611
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Personal Injury Valuation Handbooks
Author: Jury Verdict Research, Inc
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 470
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 470
Book Description
Comparable Verdicts
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 37
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 37
Book Description
What's it Worth?
Author: James P. Munger
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780327013907
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 1200
Book Description
Assess your client's personal injury case in light of similar cases in your jurisdiction with What's It Worth? & find quick answers to the most frequently asked questions What dollar value can be assigned to a particular injury? What is the likely verdict if you go to trial? Can the verdict be sustained on appeal? Should you settle out of court? What are the maximum & minimum amounts awarded in similar cases? What is the extent of a defendant's potential exposure? What's It Worth? is a quick reference for assessing damages in a personal injury case. Subtitled "A Guide to Personal Injury Awards & Settlements," this handbook contains a carefully selected sampling of cases from various jurisdictions involving numerous types of injuries. It presents up-to-date information for determining how much specific injuries are worth in today's dollars.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780327013907
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 1200
Book Description
Assess your client's personal injury case in light of similar cases in your jurisdiction with What's It Worth? & find quick answers to the most frequently asked questions What dollar value can be assigned to a particular injury? What is the likely verdict if you go to trial? Can the verdict be sustained on appeal? Should you settle out of court? What are the maximum & minimum amounts awarded in similar cases? What is the extent of a defendant's potential exposure? What's It Worth? is a quick reference for assessing damages in a personal injury case. Subtitled "A Guide to Personal Injury Awards & Settlements," this handbook contains a carefully selected sampling of cases from various jurisdictions involving numerous types of injuries. It presents up-to-date information for determining how much specific injuries are worth in today's dollars.
Compensation of Injuries
Author: Mark A. Peterson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 124
Book Description
This report describes types of injuries and losses claimed by plaintiffs, changes in claims during the 1960s and 1970s, and relationships between juries' decisions and (1) plaintiff's physical injury, (2) the economic loss suffered by plaintiff, (3) the type of lawsuit brought, and (4) the year in which the case was tried. The findings show that neither the types of injuries claimed by plaintiffs nor the level of compensation for most injuries changed appreciably between 1960 and 1980. However, compensation for the small number of cases that involved unusually severe injuries grew in recent years. The findings also show that compensation for similar injuries differed by as much as four-fold among different types of law suits, and that such differences increased in the 1970s. The report offers explanations for why compensation might differ among types of suits and describes further research that will examine some of these possible explanations.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 124
Book Description
This report describes types of injuries and losses claimed by plaintiffs, changes in claims during the 1960s and 1970s, and relationships between juries' decisions and (1) plaintiff's physical injury, (2) the economic loss suffered by plaintiff, (3) the type of lawsuit brought, and (4) the year in which the case was tried. The findings show that neither the types of injuries claimed by plaintiffs nor the level of compensation for most injuries changed appreciably between 1960 and 1980. However, compensation for the small number of cases that involved unusually severe injuries grew in recent years. The findings also show that compensation for similar injuries differed by as much as four-fold among different types of law suits, and that such differences increased in the 1970s. The report offers explanations for why compensation might differ among types of suits and describes further research that will examine some of these possible explanations.
Recovery of Interest as Damages in Personal Injury Cases
Author: Institute of Judicial Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Compensation (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 136
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Compensation (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 136
Book Description
Product Liability
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages : 120
Book Description
Examination and Analysis of Personal Injury Jury Verdicts and Economic Theory
Author: Ernest Acevedo
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Compensation (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
There is surprisingly little research on the determination of verdicts in personal injury cases. This thesis examines current national jury award data and finds them to be consistent with data compiled locally. Two economic theories, Coase's theorem and hedonic damage theory, are used to help explain variations in awards. Coase's theorem, using assumptions that do not exist in reality, provides a model that shows how efficient compensation for damages will be allocated. This is done in a way that promotes economic efficiency without considering emotional issues. The hedonic damage theory is more normative. It presents a method for valuing damages that includes putting a dollar value on potential lost pleasures. While some argue that this discourages economic efficiency by allowing emotions to affect jury decisions, hedonic theory does consider emotional factors that do in fact influence jurors. We conclude that both theories play a part in the determination of personal injury verdicts. High awards in cases involving emotional distress would indicate the presence of hedonic damages, suggesting that juries do look beyond earning potential when making awards. The Coase Theorem provides a method of damage determination for large cases. Taking a case to court involves high transaction costs, defying a key assumption of the Coase Theorem. With small cases this cost is too high to allow the theory to work effectively. In larger cases, however, transaction costs become less significant relative to the total value of the case, enabling the case to be settled in a manner consistent with Coase's theorem.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Compensation (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
There is surprisingly little research on the determination of verdicts in personal injury cases. This thesis examines current national jury award data and finds them to be consistent with data compiled locally. Two economic theories, Coase's theorem and hedonic damage theory, are used to help explain variations in awards. Coase's theorem, using assumptions that do not exist in reality, provides a model that shows how efficient compensation for damages will be allocated. This is done in a way that promotes economic efficiency without considering emotional issues. The hedonic damage theory is more normative. It presents a method for valuing damages that includes putting a dollar value on potential lost pleasures. While some argue that this discourages economic efficiency by allowing emotions to affect jury decisions, hedonic theory does consider emotional factors that do in fact influence jurors. We conclude that both theories play a part in the determination of personal injury verdicts. High awards in cases involving emotional distress would indicate the presence of hedonic damages, suggesting that juries do look beyond earning potential when making awards. The Coase Theorem provides a method of damage determination for large cases. Taking a case to court involves high transaction costs, defying a key assumption of the Coase Theorem. With small cases this cost is too high to allow the theory to work effectively. In larger cases, however, transaction costs become less significant relative to the total value of the case, enabling the case to be settled in a manner consistent with Coase's theorem.
What's it Worth?
Author: Eileen Swarbrick
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781522114765
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781522114765
Category : Damages
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description