Communications Act Amendments of 1977 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Communications Act Amendments of 1977 PDF full book. Access full book title Communications Act Amendments of 1977 by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on Communications. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on Communications
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Broadcasting
Languages : en
Pages : 320
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on Communications
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Broadcasting
Languages : en
Pages : 320
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on Communications
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 1720
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1324
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 246
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1192
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal mines and mining
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Texas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Natural resources
Languages : en
Pages : 588
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Valerie C. Brannon
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781092635158
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 50
Get Book Here
Book Description
As the Supreme Court has recognized, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have become important venues for users to exercise free speech rights protected under the First Amendment. Commentators and legislators, however, have questioned whether these social media platforms are living up to their reputation as digital public forums. Some have expressed concern that these sites are not doing enough to counter violent or false speech. At the same time, many argue that the platforms are unfairly banning and restricting access to potentially valuable speech. Currently, federal law does not offer much recourse for social media users who seek to challenge a social media provider's decision about whether and how to present a user's content. Lawsuits predicated on these sites' decisions to host or remove content have been largely unsuccessful, facing at least two significant barriers under existing federal law. First, while individuals have sometimes alleged that these companies violated their free speech rights by discriminating against users' content, courts have held that the First Amendment, which provides protection against state action, is not implicated by the actions of these private companies. Second, courts have concluded that many non-constitutional claims are barred by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. ยง 230, which provides immunity to providers of interactive computer services, including social media providers, both for certain decisions to host content created by others and for actions taken "voluntarily" and "in good faith" to restrict access to "objectionable" material. Some have argued that Congress should step in to regulate social media sites. Government action regulating internet content would constitute state action that may implicate the First Amendment. In particular, social media providers may argue that government regulations impermissibly infringe on the providers' own constitutional free speech rights. Legal commentators have argued that when social media platforms decide whether and how to post users' content, these publication decisions are themselves protected under the First Amendment. There are few court decisions evaluating whether a social media site, by virtue of publishing, organizing, or even editing protected speech, is itself exercising free speech rights. Consequently, commentators have largely analyzed the question of whether the First Amendment protects a social media site's publication decisions by analogy to other types of First Amendment cases. There are at least three possible frameworks for analyzing governmental restrictions on social media sites' ability to moderate user content. Which of these three frameworks applies will depend largely on the particular action being regulated. Under existing law, social media platforms may be more likely to receive First Amendment protection when they exercise more editorial discretion in presenting user-generated content, rather than if they neutrally transmit all such content. In addition, certain types of speech receive less protection under the First Amendment. Courts may be more likely to uphold regulations targeting certain disfavored categories of speech such as obscenity or speech inciting violence. Finally, if a law targets a social media site's conduct rather than speech, it may not trigger the protections of the First Amendment at all.
Author: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1228
Get Book Here
Book Description
February issue includes Appendix entitled Directory of United States Government periodicals and subscription publications; September issue includes List of depository libraries; June and December issues include semiannual index
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Finance, Public
Languages : en
Pages : 1032
Get Book Here
Book Description
Catalog of reports, decisions and opinions, testimonies and speeches.
