Buckley V. Valeo and Wisconsin's Campaign Finance Law

Buckley V. Valeo and Wisconsin's Campaign Finance Law PDF Author: Wisconsin. Legislature. Legislative Reference Bureau
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 6

Get Book Here

Book Description

Buckley V. Valeo and Wisconsin's Campaign Finance Law

Buckley V. Valeo and Wisconsin's Campaign Finance Law PDF Author: Wisconsin. Legislature. Legislative Reference Bureau
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 6

Get Book Here

Book Description


Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment

Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment PDF Author: L. Paige Whitaker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 34

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Campaign Finance Cases

The Campaign Finance Cases PDF Author: Melvin I. Urofsky
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 0700629882
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 255

Get Book Here

Book Description
Rarely does the Supreme Court reverse itself as quickly and profoundly as it did in recent campaign finance cases, with the Citizens United decision of 2010 undoing the constraints of the McCain-Feingold Act upheld in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003). And rarely have the stakes seemed so high, as billionaires vie for elected office and dark money floods political campaigns. In timely fashion, this new edition updates Melvin Urofsky’s classic study of campaign finance law, bringing his cogent analysis of the relevant statutes and court cases up to date. Urofsky explains in clear and convincing language what was—and is—at stake in the twists and turns of campaign finance laws taken up by the nation’s highest court in the past decades. Beginning with Buckley v. Valeo (1976) and moving through McConnell, Citizens United, and finally McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014), Urofsky discusses the two principles at issue in these cases: freedom of political speech, and the protection of the political process from undue influence. Conventional wisdom holds that in such cases liberals want greater restrictions and conservatives want corporations to have greater freedom to influence voters. But working from a rich store of primary sources, probing the motivations and ideas of all participants in the campaign finance legal story, Urofsky reveals a far more complex picture, one whose significance transcends simple political ideologies. In a time of controversies over political speech in the blogosphere, social media, and cable news, and claims of electoral fraud, The Campaign Finance Cases offers a much-needed, balanced account of how issues critical to American democracy figure in the adjudication of campaign finance law, and how a changing political and media landscape might alter the process.

Campaign finance reform & the constitution

Campaign finance reform & the constitution PDF Author: Burt Neuborne
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 21

Get Book Here

Book Description


Constitutionality Of Campaign Finance Regulation: Buckley V. Valeo And Its Supreme Court Progeny (Rl30669).

Constitutionality Of Campaign Finance Regulation: Buckley V. Valeo And Its Supreme Court Progeny (Rl30669). PDF Author: L. Paige Whitaker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin

Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin PDF Author: Wisconsin. Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 92

Get Book Here

Book Description


Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment:.

Campaign Finance Regulation Under the First Amendment:. PDF Author: L. Paige Whitaker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
This Report first discusses the critical holdings enunciated by the Supreme Court in Buckley, including those: upholding reasonable contribution limits, striking down expenditure limits, upholding disclosure reporting requirements, and upholding the system of voluntary presidential election expenditure limitations linked with public financing. It then examines the Court’s extension of Buckley in fourteen subsequent cases, evaluating them in three regulatory contexts: contribution limits (California Medical Association v. FEC; Citizens Against Rent Control v. Berkeley; Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC), expenditure limits (First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti; FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life; Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce; FEC v. National Right to Work; Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC; FEC v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; FEC v. National Conservative Political Action Committee), and disclosure requirements (Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation; Brown v. Socialist Workers ‘74 Campaign Committee; FEC v. Akins; McIntrye v. Ohio Elections Commission).

The Wisconsin Campaign Financing Law and Constitutional Constraints on Campaign Financing Laws

The Wisconsin Campaign Financing Law and Constitutional Constraints on Campaign Financing Laws PDF Author: Shaun P. Haas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description


Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin: Supporting information

Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform, State of Wisconsin: Supporting information PDF Author: Wisconsin. Governor's Blue-Ribbon Commission on Campaign Finance Reform
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Campaign funds
Languages : en
Pages : 288

Get Book Here

Book Description


Inside the Campaign Finance Battle

Inside the Campaign Finance Battle PDF Author: Anthony Corrado
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 0815715846
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 346

Get Book Here

Book Description
In 2002 Congress enacted the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), the first major revision of federal campaign finance law in a generation. In March 2001, after a fiercely contested and highly divisive seven-year partisan legislative battle, the Senate passed S. 27, known as the McCain-Feingold legislation. The House responded by passing H.R. 2356, companion legislation known as Shays-Meehan, in February 2002. The Senate then approved the House-passed version, and President George W. Bush signed BCRA into law on March 27, 2002, stating that the bill had "flaws" but overall "improves the current system of financing for federal campaigns." The Reform Act was taken to court within hours of the President's signature. Dozens of interest groups and lawmakers who had opposed passage of the Act in Congress lodged complaints that challenged the constitutionality of virtually every aspect of the new law. Following review by a special three-judge panel, the case is expected to reach the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003. This litigation constitutes the most important campaign finance case since the Supreme Court issued its decision in Buckley v. Valeo more than twenty-five years ago. The testimony, submitted by some of the country's most knowledgeable political scientists and most experienced politicians, constitutes an invaluable body of knowledge about the complexities of campaign finance and the role of money in our political system. Unfortunately, only the lawyers, political scientists, and practitioners actually involved in the litigation have seen most of this writing—until now. Ins ide the Campaign Finance Battle makes key testimony in this historic case available to a general readership, in the process shedding new light on campaign finance practices central to the congressional debate on the reform act and to the landmark litigation challenging its constitutionality.