Audit Committee Accounting Expertise and Financial Reporting Quality PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Audit Committee Accounting Expertise and Financial Reporting Quality PDF full book. Access full book title Audit Committee Accounting Expertise and Financial Reporting Quality by Vic Naiker. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Vic Naiker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Audit committees
Languages : en
Pages : 390
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Vic Naiker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Audit committees
Languages : en
Pages : 390
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Chaudhry Ghafran
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
This thesis examines the impact of audit committee characteristics on financial reporting quality in the context of a large sample of UK companies over the period 2007-2010. The notion of financial reporting quality is assessed by looking at the audit quality and earnings quality of the firms. This study utilises the audit fee and non-audit fee ratio as its proxies for audit quality and accruals based earnings management models as its proxies for earnings quality. The findings from the multivariate analysis show that audit committee meetings and financial expertise exert a significant positive impact on audit fees. Investigating expertise further, this study finds no support for the notion that accounting expertise influences audit fees, however a significant positive influence on audit fees is recorded for the non-accounting financial expertise. However, the holding of additional directorships has a significant negative impact on audit fees. This study also finds that audit committee members' financial expertise has a negative and significant impact on non-audit fee ratio suggesting a strong support of members with financial expertise on issues relating to auditor independence. The study also documents that audit committee members serving longer on the boards do not prefer to purchase high amount of non-audit services from the incumbent auditor. This study also records a significant positive impact of the holding of additional directorships on the provision of non-audit fee ratio, thus signifying a profound support for the busyness hypothesis which argues that overstretched directors are not very good monitors of financial reporting quality. Furthermore, this study finds broadly consistent evidence that audit committees meeting three or more times per year and fully independent audit committees exert a significant positive impact on the quality of reported earnings. This study also finds some evidence (depending on the earnings model used) that the level of ownership of audit committee members also exerts a positive impact on the quality of reported earnings, highlighting the fact that audit committee members with an equity stake in their companies are considered more effective in their oversight of the financial reporting process. On the other hand, this study finds evidence that the busyness of audit committee members (busyness defined in terms of the holding of board seats in other companies) has a significant negative impact on the quality of reported earnings. The composite variables (i.e. ACE1, ACE2, ACE3 and ACE4) representing those companies that satisfy all aspects of current best practice in terms of audit committee composition and operation, has a positive impact on the quality of reported earnings. This study covers the period 2007 to 2010 and therefore offers a contemporary analysis of the influence of audit committee characteristics on financial reporting quality. The study is very comprehensive in its scope not only in the selection of audit committee characteristics and methods employed to quantify these characteristics, but also in the use of various proxies developed to capture the true essence of financial reporting quality. The choice of multiple measurement methods both for the dependent and independent variables facilitates a much richer investigation into the relationship between governance and financial reporting quality variables. Therefore this study makes a major contribution to our understanding of the association between the various audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality in the wake of recently introduced regulatory recommendations. These findings will also have policy implications as regulators around the world continue to define and refine the desired characteristics and behaviour of audit committees. Therefore, the findings of this study will ensure future policy changes regarding audit committees are adequately informed.
Author: Kevin T. Rich
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781109382860
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 95
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Frank M. Burke
Publisher: CCH
ISBN: 9780808091646
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 468
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John Lewis Abernathy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 141
Get Book Here
Book Description
This dissertation investigates the relationship between audit committee characteristics and financial reporting quality. The dissertation is organized into three essays that examine this topic. The first two essays examine audit committee characteristics and their association with various measures of financial reporting quality. Essay Three summarizes relevant literature regarding conservatism, a measure of financial reporting quality. In Essay One, I examine whether adding board members with accounting financial expertise to the audit committee is associated with an increase in a firm's accounting conservatism. The results of this study provide evidence that the addition of accounting expertise is positively associated with higher conservatism as measured by the Penman and Zhang (2000) C-Score measure of conservatism, but only for firms with a strong governance structure. For firms with weak governance, the addition of accounting expertise to the audit committee is associated with higher levels of conservatism as measured by the Givoly and Hayn (2000) negative accruals measure of conservatism. However, the addition of accounting financial expertise is not associated with higher levels of conservatism as measured by the Beaver and Ryan (2000) book-to market measure. Sensitivity analysis suggests that the addition of accounting financial expertise is associated with higher conditional conservatism as measured by the Basu (1997) asymmetric loss recognition measure. In Essay Two, I investigate the association between analyst earnings forecast properties and the presence of accounting financial expertise on audit committees. The results indicate that the presence of accounting financial expertise is associated with significantly higher forecast accuracy and significantly lower forecast dispersion. Additionally, I find that the non-accounting financial expertise is significantly associated with higher analyst forecast accuracy and lower forecast dispersion, but nonfinacial expertise is not. Essay Three summarizes relevant literature regarding conservatism, a measure of financial reporting quality.
Author: Andrew J. Felo
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
In this paper, we empirically examine the relationship between two audit committee characteristics - the composition (expertise and independence) and size of the audit committee - and the quality of financial reporting. We show that after controlling for firm size, board composition, a measure of management's commitment to transparency (the existence of an ethics program) and institutional ownership, the percentage of audit committee members having expertise in accounting or financial management is positively related to financial reporting quality. We also find some evidence of a positive relationship between the size of the audit committee and financial reporting quality. However, audit committee independence is not related to financial reporting quality. We also verify that our results are robust across different measures of financial reporting quality. Our results suggest that mandating greater expertise on audit committees rather than simply requiring one expert on the audit committee may be beneficial to investors. In addition, our results also provide weak support for the recommendation of the Blue Ribbon Committee that firms devote significant directorial resources to the audit committee. Given the prior evidence of a negative relationship between financial reporting quality and cost of capital, firms could improve their reporting quality by appropriately structuring their audit committees, thus reducing their cost of capital.
Author: Johanna Miettinen
Publisher: University of Vaasa
ISBN: 9524762447
Category : Audit committees
Languages : en
Pages : 169
Get Book Here
Book Description
Tiivistelmä: Tilintarkastuksen laadun vaikutus tarkastusvaliokunnan tehokkuuden ja taloudellisen tiedon laadun väliseen suhteeseen.
Author: Jayanthi Krishnan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Recent trends in corporate board composition indicate an increase in the appointment of directors with legal expertise. Using two financial reporting quality measures, accruals quality and discretionary accruals, we find - for a sample of Russell 1000 firms in 2003 and 2005 - that the presence (and proportion) of directors with legal backgrounds on the audit committee is associated with higher financial reporting quality. These results obtain after controlling for accounting expertise on audit committees. Also, supplementary tests indicate a positive association between changes in legal expertise and changes in financial reporting quality, suggesting that legal expertise serves as a monitor rather than as a signal of financial reporting quality. Further, the two forms of expertise interact - i.e., the presence of directors with both forms of expertise enhances financial reporting quality, beyond the contribution of the individual forms of expertise. Additional tests suggest that the positive effects of legal expertise are greater in the post-SOX period compared with a pre-SOX year.
Author: James D. Whitworth
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Accounting
Languages : en
Pages : 73
Get Book Here
Book Description
My dissertation examines the impact of audit committee financial expertise on the circumstances and likelihood of an auditor change. Auditor changes are costly events associated with decreased financial reporting quality. The audit committee is in position to influence the timing and circumstances surrounding these changes through their role overseeing the external financial reporting process. I find that audit committees with greater accounting expertise are associated with fewer auditor changes overall, more auditor dismissals when there is an auditor change, greater industry expertise by the successor auditor, and an increase in financial reporting quality following the auditor change. I find no consistent evidence supporting the impact of supervisory expertise influencing any of the above outcomes.
Author: Brandon Szerwo
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Accountants
Languages : en
Pages : 69
Get Book Here
Book Description
I examine whether accounting experts on the audit committee outperform other financial experts in monitoring financial reporting in the post-SOX era. SOX changed both the audit committee composition and financial reporting quality, indicating that prior findings of the association between accounting expertise and financial reporting quality from the pre-SOX and SOX implementation eras may not generalize to periods after SOX implementation. I find, in the post-SOX era, that accounting experts fail to outperform other financial experts. I then test for the association using former audit partners and they too, even with their high levels of accounting expertise, fail to outperform other financial experts. I further investigate this lack of association by examining how the association varies within expert type, based on when the expert was appointed as an audit committee member. I find that pre-SOX appointment former audit partners are the only group consistently associated with higher financial reporting quality, suggesting that previously identified incremental associations have been diluted by more recently appointed experts. The results suggest that, broadly, regulation aimed at influencing audit committee composition and expertise altered the previously documented relation. Additionally, they suggest that changing the definition of a financial expert to be more accounting focused, as recently requested by some investor advocates, is unlikely to improve financial reporting quality.
