Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals PDF full book. Access full book title Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals by Daniel Peat. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Daniel Peat
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1108415474
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 293
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book examines an unexplored method of interpretation: the use of domestic law in the interpretation of international law.
Author: Daniel Peat
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1108415474
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 293
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book examines an unexplored method of interpretation: the use of domestic law in the interpretation of international law.
Author: Lewis Appleton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Arbitration (International law)
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Lewis Appleton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative courts
Languages : en
Pages : 55
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Charles William Eliot
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Arbitration (International law)
Languages : en
Pages : 8
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Lewis Appleton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Arbitration (International law)
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Mark W. Janis
Publisher: BRILL
ISBN: 9004640177
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 277
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: W. Paul Gormley
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9401195307
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 220
Get Book Here
Book Description
The most important sipgle factor in guaranteeing the effective pro tection of human rights - including economic and property interest- is that private individuals and groups be capable of maintaining a judicial action against any sovereign State causing them injury. Thus, individuals must possess the necessary locus standi at both the regional and international levels. A private individual must be able to prosecute an action before an international tribunal - in his own name - against an offending Government, particularly his own. Unfortunately, this necessary right of action was not recognized under traditional internatio nallaw. It is only very recently, since the adoption of the European Convention of Human Rights and the Establishing Treaty of the Common Market, that nongovernmental entities have achieved locus standi before international courts. As this book is being written, it is no longer valid to hold that only States are procedural subjects of international law. Nevertheless, it must - tragically - be conceded that individuals do not enjoy the same standing as Member States. This same generalization applies to the United Nations. Starting with the proposition that the individual is a subject of the Law, this book not only analyses examples supporting this viewpoint, but it concentrates on the more important shortcomings, primarily those existing within the Council of Europe, the European Economic Community, and the United Nations. Therefore, recommendations are offered as to the specific improvements that must be made.
Author: Chittharanjan F. Amerasinghe
Publisher: BRILL
ISBN: 9047403142
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 943
Get Book Here
Book Description
This work analyzes the jurisdictional powers of international tribunals in certain areas of fundamental significance and importance. It clarifies how tribunals and consensual arrangements have approached problems and which general principles may have emerged. Special aspects of jurisdiction of some particular tribunals have been studied in greater detail. These are: the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice, the ICSID arbitration tribunals, the administrative tribunals covering disputes between international organizations and their employees, the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. The choice of these tribunals has been based on the distinctive character of each one of them in the context of modern international legal relations. This work will be of interest to practitioners involved in the current practice of these courts and tribunals as well as academics studying the more general principles.
Author: Thomas Holton
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9401188262
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Get Book Here
Book Description
The classical concept ofInternationalLa w, as developed by Gentilis, Gro tius and their successors, accepted as its starting point the sovereignty of states, from which it followed that (r) the rules of International Law were based upon the general consent of those states; and (2) that, since state sovereignty was not capable of limitation, otherwise than by the consent of the state itself, in the last resort, International Law must accept the fact of war. Two world wars within the space of thirty years, and the development of nuclear weapons of unlimited potential, have compelled statesmen and lawyers to take a fresh look at the foundations of international relations. The First World War was followed by the creation of the League of Nations, and by the establish ment of the Permanent Court of International Justice. The failure of both, insofar as the preservation of peace was concerned, was apparent in the continuance of international insecurity, culminating in World War II. This again was followed by the establishment of a new inter national organisation, the United Nations, with its auxiliary, the International Court of Justice. Nevertheless, international security seems further away than ever, and it may be suggested that it is the devastating potential of nuclear weapons, rather than the strength of international machinery, which has so far prevented a third general conflict far more disastrous than either of the two World Wars which have already taken place.
Author: Marina Aksenova
Publisher: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher
ISBN: 828348138X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 480
Get Book Here
Book Description
The ‘International Military Tribunal for the Far East’ (IMTFE), held in Tokyo from May 1946 to November 1948, was a landmark event in the development of modern international criminal law. The trial in Tokyo was a complex undertaking and international effort to hold individuals accountable for core international crimes and delivering justice. The Tribunal consisted of 11 judges and respective national prosecution teams from 11 countries, and a mixed Japanese–American team of defence lawyers. The IMTFE indicted 28 Japanese defendants, amongst them former prime ministers, cabinet ministers, military leaders, and diplomats, based on a 55-count indictment pertaining to crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The judgment was not unanimous, with one majority judgment, two concurring opinions, and three dissenting opinions. The trial and the outcome were the subject of significant controversy and the Tribunal’s files were subsequently shelved in the archives. While its counterpart in Europe, the ‘International Military Tribunal’ (IMT) at Nuremberg, has been at the centre of public and scholarly interest, the Tokyo Tribunal has more recently gained international scholarly attention. This volume combines perspectives from law, history, and the social sciences to discuss the legal, historical, political and cultural significance of the Tokyo Tribunal. The collection is based on an international conference marking the 70th anniversary of the judgment of the IMTFE, which was held in Nuremberg in 2018. The volume features reflections by eminent scholars and experts on the establishment and functioning of the Tribunal, procedural and substantive issues as well as receptions and repercussions of the trial.
