Air Mobility: The Strategic Use of Nonlethal Airpower PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Air Mobility: The Strategic Use of Nonlethal Airpower PDF full book. Access full book title Air Mobility: The Strategic Use of Nonlethal Airpower by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Strategic air mobility is traditionally viewed as a support or enhancement force. As such, it serves to support combat forces, through their deployment and sustainment, as the combat forces seek to achieve national security objectives through lethal means. US Air Force doctrine recognizes air mobility forces only as an enhancement force, and additionally, US military command relations are established between combatant commands that almost always relegate the mobility commander to the supporting role. Air mobility can, and has, performed missions that do not support traditional combat operations. These operations represent the direct application of nonlethal airpower to achieve national security objectives. In the changing international political environment, there is some evidence to suggest that the traditional use of the US military for conventional combat operations may become less commonplace. In its place, there may be a growing demand for the military to serve the national security strategy through more nonlethal operations. Air mobility may play an increased role in serving these evolving strategies. Air Fore doctrine should openly recognize the role air mobility can play in helping to achieve security objectives. This recognition could contribute to a broader fundamental foundation for forming theories of airpower employment. Finally, recognition of the direct role air mobility forces can play in achieving national security objectives could lead to new criteria for establishing command relations. Consideration of the operation's primary objective, required expertise, and resources should play a role in determining which combatant commander is best suited to direct the operation. Other combatant commanders can then be tasked to support the operation as required. In certain situations the mobility commander may best serve the operation as the "supported" commander.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Get Book Here
Book Description
Strategic air mobility is traditionally viewed as a support or enhancement force. As such, it serves to support combat forces, through their deployment and sustainment, as the combat forces seek to achieve national security objectives through lethal means. US Air Force doctrine recognizes air mobility forces only as an enhancement force, and additionally, US military command relations are established between combatant commands that almost always relegate the mobility commander to the supporting role. Air mobility can, and has, performed missions that do not support traditional combat operations. These operations represent the direct application of nonlethal airpower to achieve national security objectives. In the changing international political environment, there is some evidence to suggest that the traditional use of the US military for conventional combat operations may become less commonplace. In its place, there may be a growing demand for the military to serve the national security strategy through more nonlethal operations. Air mobility may play an increased role in serving these evolving strategies. Air Fore doctrine should openly recognize the role air mobility can play in helping to achieve security objectives. This recognition could contribute to a broader fundamental foundation for forming theories of airpower employment. Finally, recognition of the direct role air mobility forces can play in achieving national security objectives could lead to new criteria for establishing command relations. Consideration of the operation's primary objective, required expertise, and resources should play a role in determining which combatant commander is best suited to direct the operation. Other combatant commanders can then be tasked to support the operation as required. In certain situations the mobility commander may best serve the operation as the "supported" commander.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Get Book Here
Book Description
Air Force Manual (AFM 1-I), Basic Aerospace Doctrine of the United States Air Force, fails to classify Air Mobility as a weapon of deterence. The basis of this failure lies in the doctrine's narrow definition of aerospace power. AFM 1-I limits the use of this power soley for military purposes. However, aerospace power has a much broader application. As an instrument of national power, it can also be applied in non-lethal ways to achieve our national objectives. An analysis of Air Mobility's history proves this to be true.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air power
Languages : en
Pages : 35
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author's abstract: Air Force Manual (AFM 1-1), Basic Aerospace Doctrine of the United States Air Force, fails to classify Air Mobility as a weapon of deterrence. The basis of this failure lies in the doctrine's narrow definition of aerospace power. AFM 1-1 limits the use of this power soley for military purposes. However, aerospace power has a much broader application. As an instrument of national power, it can also be applied in non-lethal ways to achieve our national objectives. An analysis of Air Mobility's history proves this to be true.
Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428990313
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 129
Get Book Here
Book Description
Since airlift was first used as a tool of national security during the Berlin Airlift, it has grown to deliver passengers, cargo, and fuel to operations worldwide in support of national security. However, Air Mobility Command is the single organization that performs for air mobility for the United States. Cm%Currently, the Air Force has structured Air Mobility Command for war, yet this command performs operations during times when the US is at peace. Air Mobility Command performs missions to support US military operations in hostile environments as well as humanitarian operations in non-hostile environments. The number of operations requiring mobility air forces has been on the rise since the Cold War ended 10 years ago. These steady-state operations seem to over task mobility air forces. This study centers on the question: Can Air Mobility Command's force structure, organized for two major-theater wars, fulfill that requirement and perform the steady-state operations in today's strategic environment? This study finds that Air Mobility Command's force structure cannot meet its requirements for two major-theater wars and that the current force structure is inefficient in meeting the requirements for steady-state operations. First, this thesis presents a primer to acclimate the reader to the complex environment and multifaceted requirements of mobility air forces. Next, this thesis examines Air Mobility Command's current force structure as determined by Department of Defense requirements for war. Then this thesis also describes the various types of missions that Air Mobility Command performs on a steady-state basis and evaluates the importance of these operations in fulfilling US National Security Strategy. Finally, this thesis recommends action that the Air Force and the Department of Defense should investigate in order to improve their air mobility capabilities in.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air Force law
Languages : en
Pages : 346
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
United Nations (UN)-sponsored peacekeeping is on the rise since the end of the Cold War. The character of peacekeeping has changed, expanding to include intruding into internal state elections, policing, human rights review, and other traditionally sovereign institutions. Since the end of the Cold War, America is the sole remaining superpower, and the world looks to the US to continue its leadership role. Our new national strategy of engagement and enlargement recognizes the benefit of global stability and clearly identifies peacekeeping as not the centerpiece, but nonetheless, an important tool in implementing our national security strategy. Various constraints limit direct American involvement in UN-sponsored peacekeeping. One area where the US has contributed significantly is in transporting peacekeeping forces to and from the conflict area. These transport missions provide both a national strategic bargaining chip and some of the best peacetime operational training opportunities available. A significant, but largely unrecognized by-product, is the international credibility derived for the 'Global Reach' leg of US Air Force military strategy. The paper concludes the US should continue to provide air mobility assets in moderation to UN-sponsored peacekeeping operations.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 110
Get Book Here
Book Description
Since airlift was first used as a tool of national security during the Berlin Airlift, it has grown to deliver passengers, cargo, and fuel to operations worldwide in support of national security. However, Air Mobility Command is the single organization that performs for air mobility for the United States. Cm%Currently, the Air Force has structured Air Mobility Command for war, yet this command performs operations during times when the US is at peace. Air Mobility Command performs missions to support US military operations in hostile environments as well as humanitarian operations in non-hostile environments. The number of operations requiring mobility air forces has been on the rise since the Cold War ended 10 years ago. These steady-state operations seem to over task mobility air forces. This study centers on the question: Can Air Mobility Command's force structure, organized for two major-theater wars, fulfill that requirement and perform the steady-state operations in today's strategic environment? This study finds that Air Mobility Command's force structure cannot meet its requirements for two major-theater wars and that the current force structure is inefficient in meeting the requirements for steady-state operations. First, this thesis presents a primer to acclimate the reader to the complex environment and multifaceted requirements of mobility air forces. Next, this thesis examines Air Mobility Command's current force structure as determined by Department of Defense requirements for war. Then this thesis also describes the various types of missions that Air Mobility Command performs on a steady-state basis and evaluates the importance of these operations in fulfilling US National Security Strategy. Finally, this thesis recommends action that the Air Force and the Department of Defense should investigate in order to improve their air mobility capabilities in
Author: Douglas C. Lovelace
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428912959
Category : Low-intensity conflicts (Military science)
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: John M. Harrison
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air power
Languages : en
Pages : 17
Get Book Here
Book Description
"Overcoming homegrown insurgencies requires a much more creative and broad use of airpower than just dropping bombs and strafing ground targets. The non-kinetic roles of airpower play a significant and sometimes decisive role in winning over the population and overcoming insurgencies. These effects range from air mobility, to psychological operations (psyops); to intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR). Even further, these effects can include leadership skills and relationship building, as emphasized in the case of Ed Lansdale. This historiographical essay will focus on three books that provide historical evidence that supports the use of non-kinetic roles of airpower. In addition, two of the works chronicle specific Air Force officers, Heini Aderholt and Edward Lansdale, that in the face of a service stuck in the mindset of dropping bombs and firing bullets, had the vision and imagination to see other more important roles for the Air Force."--Abstract.
Author: Mark Clodfelter
Publisher: U of Nebraska Press
ISBN: 9780803264540
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 338
Get Book Here
Book Description
Tracing the use of air power in World War II and the Korean War, Mark Clodfelter explains how U. S. Air Force doctrine evolved through the American experience in these conventional wars only to be thwarted in the context of a limited guerrilla struggle in Vietnam. Although a faith in bombing's sheer destructive power led air commanders to believe that extensive air assaults could win the war at any time, the Vietnam experience instead showed how even intense aerial attacks may not achieve military or political objectives in a limited war. Based on findings from previously classified documents in presidential libraries and air force archives as well as on interviews with civilian and military decision makers, The Limits of Air Power argues that reliance on air campaigns as a primary instrument of warfare could not have produced lasting victory in Vietnam. This Bison Books edition includes a new chapter that provides a framework for evaluating air power effectiveness in future conflicts.
