Author: Texas Nurses' Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 250
Book Description
ABCs of Nursing Peer Review, 2010
Author: Texas Nurses' Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 250
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 250
Book Description
ABCs of nursing peer review : a reference guide for implementing nursing peer review
Author: Texas Nurses Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Peer Review in Nursing
Author: Barbara Haag-Heitman
Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Learning
ISBN: 0763790400
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 261
Book Description
Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for a Successful Practice is the first nursing publication that approaches the definition and implementation strategies for peer review within an organizational setting. Using a professional model, with shared governance as a framework, the authors discuss the difference between manger initiated staff performance evaluation of the past and the true peer review aspects of professional practice for the future. This text follows in line with the Magnet program requiremet “that nurses at all levels use self appraisal performance review and peer review, including annual goal settings, for the assurance of competence and professional development” page 30 of the 2008 Magnet manual. This unique text teaches nurses the skills they need to demonstrate organizational processes, structures, and outcomes that help insure accountability, competence and autonomy.
Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Learning
ISBN: 0763790400
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 261
Book Description
Peer Review in Nursing: Principles for a Successful Practice is the first nursing publication that approaches the definition and implementation strategies for peer review within an organizational setting. Using a professional model, with shared governance as a framework, the authors discuss the difference between manger initiated staff performance evaluation of the past and the true peer review aspects of professional practice for the future. This text follows in line with the Magnet program requiremet “that nurses at all levels use self appraisal performance review and peer review, including annual goal settings, for the assurance of competence and professional development” page 30 of the 2008 Magnet manual. This unique text teaches nurses the skills they need to demonstrate organizational processes, structures, and outcomes that help insure accountability, competence and autonomy.
Guidelines for Peer Review
Author: American Nurses Association. Ad Hoc Committee on Implementation of Standards of Nursing Practice
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 9
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 9
Book Description
Peer Review Guidelines
Author: Task Force on Peer Review
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
RN-to-RN Peer Review
Author: Chitra Sharifian
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Peer Review Guidelines
Author: American Nurses' Association. Task Force on Peer Review
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Book Description
The Influence of Peer Review on Nursing Practice
Author: Andrea Klipp
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 55
Book Description
Purpose: The purpose of this integrative literature review was to identify whether peer review improves nursing practice. Literature was reviewed, analyzed and synthesized to explore the implications peer review has on nursing practice. Design: Integrative review that included a review a quantitative and qualitative research studies and a review of literature that explored the practice of peer review. Methods: Articles published since 2009 that included information on peer review were critically evaluated and reviewed based on the Professional Nursing Standards of the American Nurses Association (ANA) and its definition of nursing peer review. Findings: From the available literature on peer review in nursing, ten studies were analyzed. The majority of the studies reviewed were within both the nursing field and the United States. Peer review was implemented in a variety of ways. Perceptions of peer review, implementation and implications of peer review were outlined in the analyzed studies. Constraints of peer review were lack of time and an inadequate number of staff to support the peer review process. Most participants desired to continue peer review after implementation and some used the process to sculpt future professional endeavors. Conclusions: The interpersonal nature of peer review can foster reflective practice. Communication and collaboration are essential when using peer review. Peer review is a reciprocal process and can facilitate learning from others. The use of standards when completing peer review can assist in measuring the quality of care. Relevance to Nursing Leadership: Understanding the process of peer review and the implications on nursing practice supports the Association Of Nurse Executive (AONE) competencies and the use of the Healthy Work Environment Standards of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 55
Book Description
Purpose: The purpose of this integrative literature review was to identify whether peer review improves nursing practice. Literature was reviewed, analyzed and synthesized to explore the implications peer review has on nursing practice. Design: Integrative review that included a review a quantitative and qualitative research studies and a review of literature that explored the practice of peer review. Methods: Articles published since 2009 that included information on peer review were critically evaluated and reviewed based on the Professional Nursing Standards of the American Nurses Association (ANA) and its definition of nursing peer review. Findings: From the available literature on peer review in nursing, ten studies were analyzed. The majority of the studies reviewed were within both the nursing field and the United States. Peer review was implemented in a variety of ways. Perceptions of peer review, implementation and implications of peer review were outlined in the analyzed studies. Constraints of peer review were lack of time and an inadequate number of staff to support the peer review process. Most participants desired to continue peer review after implementation and some used the process to sculpt future professional endeavors. Conclusions: The interpersonal nature of peer review can foster reflective practice. Communication and collaboration are essential when using peer review. Peer review is a reciprocal process and can facilitate learning from others. The use of standards when completing peer review can assist in measuring the quality of care. Relevance to Nursing Leadership: Understanding the process of peer review and the implications on nursing practice supports the Association Of Nurse Executive (AONE) competencies and the use of the Healthy Work Environment Standards of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN).
An Evaluation Guide for School Nursing Practice, Designed for Self and Peer Review
Author: Task Force on an Evaluation Guide for School Nursing Practice
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : School nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : School nursing
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Current Catalog
Author: National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 1628
Book Description
First multi-year cumulation covers six years: 1965-70.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 1628
Book Description
First multi-year cumulation covers six years: 1965-70.