Author: Karin A. Haines
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body mass index
Languages : en
Pages : 182
Book Description
A Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance and Skinfold Measurements in Determining Minimal Wrestling Weight in Hawaiʻi's High School Wrestlers
Author: Karin A. Haines
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body mass index
Languages : en
Pages : 182
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body mass index
Languages : en
Pages : 182
Book Description
A Comparison Of Bioelectrical Impedance And Skinfold Measurements In Determining Minimal Wrestling Weight In Hawai'i's High School Wrestlers
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Estimation of Body Fat from Skinfold Measurements for the Determination of Minimal Wrestling Weight for High School Wrestlers
Author: Gary James Rettke
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adipose tissues
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adipose tissues
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Book Description
A Comparative Analysis of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Skinfold Measurements in Determining Body Composition and Minimum Wrestling Weight in Adolescent Wrestlers
Author: Megan Schrader
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The Use of Anthropometric and Skinfold Measurements in Predicting Minimal Weights of High School Wrestlers
Author: Michael D. Bah
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Anthropometry
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Anthropometry
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Evaluation of Body Composition Assessments for a High School Wrestling Weight Certification Program
Author: Kristen M. Oja
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Wrestlers
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Background: The Oregon Wrestling Weight Monitoring Program establishes the athlete's minimum wrestling weight (MW) for the season. This program specifies the wrestler's maximum weight loss rate and was implemented in order to reduce unhealthy weight-cutting behaviors commonly practiced by wrestlers. Aims: (1) To compare differences in percent body fat (%BF) between 3 body composition assessment methods, (2) To examine agreement between 2 hydration assessment methods, (3) To detect the presence of systematic bias in MW-prediction for 2 methods of body composition assessment, compared to a criterion, (4) To gather information pertaining to weight-cutting methods used and the frequency with which these methods were used. Methods: Participants included 55 male and female high school athletes, 18 of whom were wrestlers. Body composition assessment methods included the BODPOD while measuring thoracic gas volume (BPM) (criterion for MW prediction), BODPOD while estimating this volume (BPE), and leg-to-leg- bioelectric impedance analysis (L-BIA). The BODPOD body composition system is a densitometric method similar to hydrostatic weighing, however air displacement is used rather than water displacement. This technique is also referred to as air displacement plethysmography. The systematic bias of BPE and L-BIA were examined. Urine specific gravity (USG) was assessed, as an indicator of hydration level using the dipstick method and an optical refractomer. Wrestlers completed a survey. Results: The 3 methods reported similar %BF values (16.1±8.3, 15.3±8.4, 15.4±7.8) for all athletes (N=51), the subgroup of wrestlers (N=16), and males (N=20), however there was a difference in %BF between L-BIA and BPE and between L-BIA and BPM for females (N=15). Hydration assessment methods did not agree when using the high school USG cutoff (1.025 g mL-1), and agreed weakly when using the NCAA USG cutoff (1.020 g mL-1). Systematic bias existed in BPE, and limits of agreement were twice as large in L-BIA compared to BPE. Most wrestlers engaged in weight-cutting behaviors. Conclusion: L-BIA is not recommended as a method for predicting MW because individual differences between L-BIA and BPM spanned multiple weight classes. Investigators recommend that program officials consider using optical refractometers and/or consider adopting the NCAA hydration cutoff (USG
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Wrestlers
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Background: The Oregon Wrestling Weight Monitoring Program establishes the athlete's minimum wrestling weight (MW) for the season. This program specifies the wrestler's maximum weight loss rate and was implemented in order to reduce unhealthy weight-cutting behaviors commonly practiced by wrestlers. Aims: (1) To compare differences in percent body fat (%BF) between 3 body composition assessment methods, (2) To examine agreement between 2 hydration assessment methods, (3) To detect the presence of systematic bias in MW-prediction for 2 methods of body composition assessment, compared to a criterion, (4) To gather information pertaining to weight-cutting methods used and the frequency with which these methods were used. Methods: Participants included 55 male and female high school athletes, 18 of whom were wrestlers. Body composition assessment methods included the BODPOD while measuring thoracic gas volume (BPM) (criterion for MW prediction), BODPOD while estimating this volume (BPE), and leg-to-leg- bioelectric impedance analysis (L-BIA). The BODPOD body composition system is a densitometric method similar to hydrostatic weighing, however air displacement is used rather than water displacement. This technique is also referred to as air displacement plethysmography. The systematic bias of BPE and L-BIA were examined. Urine specific gravity (USG) was assessed, as an indicator of hydration level using the dipstick method and an optical refractomer. Wrestlers completed a survey. Results: The 3 methods reported similar %BF values (16.1±8.3, 15.3±8.4, 15.4±7.8) for all athletes (N=51), the subgroup of wrestlers (N=16), and males (N=20), however there was a difference in %BF between L-BIA and BPE and between L-BIA and BPM for females (N=15). Hydration assessment methods did not agree when using the high school USG cutoff (1.025 g mL-1), and agreed weakly when using the NCAA USG cutoff (1.020 g mL-1). Systematic bias existed in BPE, and limits of agreement were twice as large in L-BIA compared to BPE. Most wrestlers engaged in weight-cutting behaviors. Conclusion: L-BIA is not recommended as a method for predicting MW because individual differences between L-BIA and BPM spanned multiple weight classes. Investigators recommend that program officials consider using optical refractometers and/or consider adopting the NCAA hydration cutoff (USG
A Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Skinfold Measurements, and Girth Measurements on an Adolescent Athlete Population
Author: Beth A. Bond
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Athletes, Adolescent
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Athletes, Adolescent
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
Validity and Reliability of Body Composition Analysis of Highschool Wrestlers
Author: Carol Grace Thompson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body composition
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body composition
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Comparison of the Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance, Anthropometry, and a New Water Displacement Technique for Assessment of Body Composition in Collegiate Football Linemen and Linebackers
Author: Daniel Gene Carey
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 266
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 266
Book Description
A Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfolds in the Determination of Body Composition
Author: Beth E. Dettman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body composition
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Body composition
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Book Description