Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act PDF full book. Access full book title Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act by Paul Figley. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Paul Figley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul Figley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul Figley
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781641052917
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
This practical guide provides a simplified, easy to read concise overview of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and its jurisprudence. It is useful to attorneys or law-trained readers who are new to the FTCA and its procedures or have had limited recent dealings with the statute. It also provides a ready reference for readers of all levels who are about to begin detailed research on particular FTCA issues.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Agency Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Agency Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 272
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Landmark Publications
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781793807441
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 524
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act. * * * "As a sovereign, the United States is immune from suit unless it consents to be sued." White-Squire v. U.S. Postal Serv., 592 F.3d 453, 456 (3d Cir. 2010). The FTCA is "a limited waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States," Miller v. Phila. Geriatric Ctr., 463 F.3d 266, 270 (3d Cir. 2006), that provides that: The United States shall be liable, respecting the provisions of this title relating to tort claims, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances, but shall not be liable for interest prior to judgment or for punitive damages. * * *28 U.S.C. § 2674; see also Gotha v. United States, 115 F.3d 176, 179 (3d Cir. 1997) ("The Federal Torts [sic] Claims Act is a partial abrogation of the federal government's sovereign immunity that permits suits for torts against the United States.")."To make a claim under the FTCA, a claimant first must file her claim with the administrative agency allegedly responsible for her injuries." Santos ex rel. Beato v. United States, 559 F.3d 189, 193 (3d Cir. 2009). The statute provides: An action shall not be instituted upon a claim against the United States for money damages for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, unless the claimant shall have first presented the claim to the appropriate Federal agency and his claim shall have been finally denied by the agency in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. Sconiers v. US, 896 F. 3d 595 (3rd Cir. 2018)
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Agency Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 222
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government liability
Languages : en
Pages : 318
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jeffrey Axelrad
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Administrative discretion
Languages : en
Pages : 206
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Landmark Publications
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 546
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act. Volume 1 covers the District of Columbia Circuit and the First through the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. * * * Under the FTCA, Congress "waived the sovereign immunity of the United States for certain torts committed by federal employees." F.D.I.C. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994); see 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). "[T]o be actionable under [the FTCA], a claim must allege, inter alia, that the United States 'would be liable to the claimant' as 'a private person' 'in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.'" Id. at 477, 114 S.Ct. 996 (quoting § 1346(b)). "[T]he source of substantive liability under the FTCA" is the "law of the State." Id. at 478, 114 S.Ct. 996. Hernandez v. US, 939 F. 3d 191 (2nd Cir. 2019) * * * [There] is an exception to this provision, removing from the district courts' jurisdiction "[a]ny claim ... based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a federal agency or an employee of the Government, whether or not the discretion involved be abused." Id. § 2680(a). In evaluating a claim under the FTCA, a court must therefore determine whether the claim is based on a discretionary function as contemplated by section 2680; if so, the case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.In conducting the discretionary function inquiry, we use a "familiar analytic framework." Shansky v. United States, 164 F.3d 688, 690 (1st Cir. 1999). First, we "must identify the conduct that allegedly caused the harm." Id. at 690-91. Second, we must ask "whether this conduct is of the nature and quality that Congress, in crafting the discretionary function exception, sought to shelter from tort liability." Id. at 691. The latter analysis "encompasses two questions: Is the conduct itself discretionary? If so, is the discretion susceptible to policy-related judgments?" Id. The word "susceptible" is critical here; we do not ask whether the alleged federal tortfeasor was in fact motivated by a policy concern, but only whether the decision in question was of the type that policy analysis could inform. See United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. 315, 325, 111 S.Ct. 1267, 113 L.Ed.2d 335 (1991) ("The focus of the inquiry is not on the agent's subjective intent in exercising the discretion conferred by statute or regulation, but on the nature of the actions taken and on whether they are susceptible to policy analysis."). In addition, the fact that a government official exercises discretion pursuant to regulatory authority creates a presumption that this discretion was susceptible to policy analysis and thus protected. Id. at 324, 111 S.Ct. 1267. Hajdusek v. US, 895 F. 3d 146 (1st Cir. 2018)
